Table of Contents

​

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

​

FORM 20-F

​

OR

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022.

OR

OR

For the transition period from     to    

Commission file number: 001-39127

​

Canaan Inc.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

​

Cayman Islands

(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

28 Ayer Rajah Crescent #06-08, S139959, Singapore

(Address of principal executive offices)

James Jin Cheng, Chief Financial Officer

Telephone: +65 6305 6618

Email: IR@canaan-creative.com

28 Ayer Rajah Crescent #06-08, S139959, Singapore

* (Name, Telephone, E-mail and/or Facsimile number and Address of Company Contact Person)

​

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act.

​

*  Not for trading, but only in connection with the registration of American Depositary Shares representing such Class A ordinary shares pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

​

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act. None

Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act. None

​

Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report.

2,492,514,048 Class A ordinary shares were outstanding as of December 31, 2022

311,624,444 Class B ordinary shares were outstanding as of December 31, 2022

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. ☐ Yes ☒ No

If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. ☐ Yes ☒ No

Note - Checking the box above will not relieve any registrant required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 from their obligations under those Sections.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. ☒ Yes ☐ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). ☒ Yes ☐ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

​

If an emerging growth company that prepares its financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards† provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

†The term “new or revised financial accounting standard” refers to any update issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board to its Accounting Standards Codification after April 5, 2012.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☐

If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. ☐ Yes ☒ No

Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to § 240.10D-1(b). ☐ Yes ☒ No

Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:

​

If “Other” has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow. ☐ Item 17 ☐ Item 18

If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). ☐ Yes ☒ No

(APPLICABLE ONLY TO ISSUERS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS DURING THE PAST FIVE YEARS)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Sections 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court. ☐ Yes ☐ No

​

​

​

Table of Contents

CANAAN INC.

FORM 20-F ANNUAL REPORT

FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2022

​

​

​

​

​

​

i

Table of Contents

Conventions that Apply to this Annual Report on Form 20-F

In this annual report, unless otherwise indicated:

The translations from Renminbi to U.S. dollars and from U.S. dollars to Renminbi in this annual report were made at a rate of RMB6.8972 to US$1.00, the exchange rates set forth in the H.10 statistical release of the Federal Reserve Board on December 30, 2022. We make no representation that the Renminbi or U.S. dollars amounts referred to in this annual report could have been or could be converted into U.S. dollars or Renminbi, as the case may be, at any particular rate or at all.

Our ADSs are listed on the NASDAQ Global Market under the symbol “CAN.”

​

ii

Table of Contents

Glossary of Technical Terms

This glossary contains explanations of certain terms used in this annual report in connection with our company and our business. In this annual report, unless otherwise indicated:

iii

Table of Contents

Forward-Looking Information

This annual report contains statements of a forward-looking nature. All statements other than statements of historical facts are forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are made under the “safe harbor” provision under Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, and as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. In some cases, these forward-looking statements can be identified by words or phrases such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “aim,” “estimate,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe,” “potential,” “continue,” “is/are likely to” or other similar expressions.

These forward-looking statements relate to, among others:

We have based these forward-looking statements largely on our current expectations and projections about future events and financial trends that we believe may affect our financial condition, results of operations, business strategy and financial needs.

You should read these statements in conjunction with the risks disclosed in “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors” of this annual report and other risks outlined in our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC. Moreover, we operate in an emerging and evolving environment. New risks may emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for our management to predict all risks, nor can we assess the impact of such risks on our business or the extent to which any risk, or combination of risks, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements made in this annual report relate only to events or information as of the date on which the statements are made in this annual report. Except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which the statements are made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. You should read this annual report and the documents that we have referred to in this annual report, completely and with the understanding that our actual future results may be materially different from what we expect.

​

​

iv

Table of Contents

PART I

ITEM 1.IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISERS

Not required.

​

ITEM 2.OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE

Not required.

​

ITEM 3.KEY INFORMATION

We are a Cayman Islands holding company and conduct all of our operations through our operating subsidiaries. Investors in the ADSs are not purchasing equity securities of our operating subsidiaries but instead are purchasing equity securities of a Cayman Islands holding company. We face various legal and operational risks and uncertainties associated with being based in or having a portion of our operations in China and the complex and evolving PRC laws and regulations. For example, we face risks associated with regulatory approvals on offerings conducted overseas and foreign investment in China-based issuers, anti-monopoly regulatory actions, regulatory actions for virtual currency-related business activities and mining activities and oversight on cybersecurity and data privacy, which may negatively impact our ability to conduct certain businesses, access foreign investments, or list on foreign stock exchange. These risks could result in a material adverse change in our operations and the value of our ADSs, limit or hinder our ability to offer or continue to offer securities to investors, or cause the value of such securities to significantly decline or become worthless. For a detailed description of risks relating to doing business in China, see “—D. Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Doing Business in the PRC.”

Our auditors, KPMG Huazhen LLP and PricewaterhouseCoopers Zhong Tian LLP are independent registered public accounting firms that issue the audit reports included elsewhere in this annual report. Our securities will be prohibited from trading on a national securities exchange or in the over-the-counter trading market in the United States under the Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act, or the HFCAA, if the Securities and Exchange Commission determines that Canaan has have filed audit reports issued by a registered public accounting firm that has not been subject to inspections by the PCAOB for two consecutive years. On December 16, 2021, the PCAOB issued a report to notify the SEC of its determination that the PCAOB was unable to inspect or investigate completely registered public accounting firms headquartered in mainland China and Hong Kong and our auditors were subject to this determination. Consequently, we were conclusively identified as a “Commission-Identified Issuer” on May 4, 2022. On December 15, 2022, the PCAOB announced that it was able to secure complete access to inspect and investigate PCAOB-registered public accounting firms headquartered in mainland China and Hong Kong in 2022. Each year, the PCAOB will determine whether it can inspect and investigate completely audit firms in mainland China and Hong Kong, among other jurisdictions. If the PCAOB determines in the future that it no longer has full access to inspect and investigate completely accounting firms in mainland China and Hong Kong and we use an accounting firm headquartered in one of these jurisdictions to issue an audit report on its financial statements filed with the SEC, we would be identified as a Commission-Identified Issuer following the filing of the annual report on Form20-F for the relevant fiscal year. In accordance with the HFCAA, our securities would be prohibited from being traded on a national securities exchange or in the over-the-counter trading market in the United States if it is identified as a Commission- Identified Issuer for two consecutive years in the future. If our securities are prohibited from trading in the United States, there is no certainty that we will be able to list on a non-U.S. exchange or that a market for our securities will develop outside of the United States. In the event of such prohibition, the Nasdaq may determine to delist our securities. The delisting of our securities, or the threat of their being delisted, may materially and adversely affect the value of your investment. See “-D. Risk Factors-Risks Relating to Doing Business in the PRC-Our ADSs may be delisted under the Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act if the PCAOB is unable to inspect auditors who are located in China. The delisting of our ADSs, or the threat of their being delisted, may materially and adversely affect the value of your investment.”

Permissions Required from the PRC Authorities for Our Operations

We conduct our business primarily through our PRC operating subsidiaries in China. Our operations in China are governed by PRC laws and regulations. As of the date of this annual report, our PRC operating subsidiaries have obtained all requisite permissions for our operations in all material aspects from relevant Chinese authorities, and none of the requisite permissions for our operations in all material aspects have been denied by the Chinese authorities.

1

Table of Contents

Given the uncertainties of interpretation and implementation of relevant laws and regulations and the enforcement practice by relevant government authorities, we may be required to obtain additional licenses, permits, filings or approvals for our business operations in the future. If our PRC operating subsidiaries (i) do not receive or maintain required permissions or approvals, (ii) inadvertently conclude that such permissions or approvals are not required, or (iii) applicable laws, regulations, or interpretations change and our PRC operating subsidiaries are required to obtain such permissions or approvals in the future, our PRC operating subsidiaries could be subject to fines, legal sanctions or an order to suspend the our PRC operating subsidiaries’ business, which may materially and adversely affect the business, financial condition and results of operations of us.

Offering of Securities outside of PRC

The China Securities Regulatory Commission, or the CSRC, promulgated Trial Administrative Measures of the Overseas Securities Offering and Listing by Domestic Companies (the “Overseas Listing Trial Measures”) and five relevant guidelines on February 17, 2023, which became effective on March 31, 2023. The Overseas Listing Trial Measures regulate both direct and indirect overseas offering and listing by PRC domestic companies by adopting a filing-based regulatory regime.

The Overseas Listing Trial Measures provide that if the issuer both meets the following criteria, the overseas securities offering and listing conducted by such issuer will be deemed as indirect overseas offering subject to the filing procedure set forth under the Overseas Listing Trial Measures: (i) 50% or more of the issuer’s operating revenue, total profit, total assets or net assets as documented in its audited consolidated financial statements for the most recent fiscal year is accounted for by the issuer’s domestic companies; and (ii) the issuer’s business activities are substantially conducted in mainland China, or its principal place of business are located in mainland China, or the senior managers in charge of its business operations and management are mostly Chinese citizens or domiciled in mainland China. The determination as to whether or not an overseas offering and listing by domestic companies is indirect, shall be made on a substance over form basis.

On the same day, the CSRC also held a press conference for the release of the Trial Measures and issued the Notice on Administration for the Filing of Overseas Offering and Listing by Domestic Companies, which, among others, clarifies that on or prior to the effective date of the Overseas Listing Trial Measures, domestic companies that have been completed their overseas offering and listing, which are called as “the stock enterprises (存量企业)”. As a stock enterprise (存量企业), we shall file with the CSRC within 3 working days after the subsequent securities offering is completed. The CSRC shall order rectification, issue warnings and impose fines to the company fails to fulfill filing procedure as stipulated in Overseas Listing Trial Measures.

In addition, the CSRC published the Provisions on Strengthening Confidentiality and Archives Administration in Respect of Overseas Issuance and Listing of Securities by Domestic Enterprises (《关于加强境内企业境外发行证券和上市相关保密和档案管理工作的规定》) on February 24, 2023, which became effective on March 31, 2023. The CSRC stipulates domestic enterprises, securities companies and securities service agencies which provide the corresponding services in the course of overseas issuance and listing of domestic enterprises, shall strengthen legal awareness of confidentiality of State secrets and archives administration, establish a sound system for confidentiality and archives work, adopt the requisite measures to perform the responsibilities of confidentiality and archives administration.

As there are still uncertainties regarding the interpretation and implementation of such regulatory guidance, we cannot assure you that we will always be able to comply with new regulatory requirements relating to our future overseas capital-raising activities. We may become subject to more stringent requirements with respect to matters including cross-border investigation and enforcement of legal claims.

2

Table of Contents

Proposed Regulation by the Cyberspace Administration of China

On July 10, 2021, the Cyberspace Administration of China, or the CAC, the National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, Ministry of State Security, Ministry of Finance, Ministry of Commerce, People’s Bank of China, State Administration for Market Regulation, National Radio and Television Administration, China Securities Regulatory Commission, National Administration of State Secrets Protection and State Cipher Code Administration jointly issued the revised Measures for Cybersecurity Review (《网络安全审查办法(2021)》) (the “Revised Review Measures”), which became effective on February 15, 2022. Pursuant to the Revised Review Measures, critical information infrastructure operators that procure internet products and services and network platform operators engaging in data processing activities that affect or may affect national security must be subject to the cybersecurity review. The Revised Review Measures further stipulate that if a network platform operator has personal information of over one million users and intends to be listed in a foreign country, it must be subject to the cybersecurity review. On November 14, 2021, the CAC published the Administrative Regulations on Internet Data Security (Draft for Comment) (《网络数据安全管理条例(征求意见稿)》, “Draft Regulations”), which stipulate the scope for data processors to declare network security review. The draft regulations may apply to the use of networks to carry out data processing activities and the supervision and administration of network data security in China and apply to activities outside China to process data of individuals and organizations in China under any of the following circumstances: (1) for the purpose of providing products or services to China; (2) analyze and evaluate the behavior of domestic individuals and organizations; (3) involving domestic important data processing; (4) other circumstances stipulated by laws and administrative regulations. The Draft Regulations further stipulate that if a data processor that processes the personal information of more than one million users intends to be listed in a foreign country, it shall declare the network security review. On July 7, 2022, CAC promulgated Measures for the Security Assessment of Outbound Data Transfers, (《数据出境安全评估办法》, the “Data Cross Border Measures”), which became effective on September 1, 2022 and provide that a data processor is required to apply for security assessment for cross-border data transfer in any of the following circumstances: (i) where a data processor provides critical data to offshore entities and individuals; (ii) where a CIIO or a data processor which processes personal information of more than one million individuals provides personal information to offshore entities and individuals; (iii) where a data processor has provided personal information in the aggregate of more than 100,000 individuals or sensitive personal information of more than 10,000 individuals in total to offshore entities and individuals since January 1 of the previous year; or (iv) other circumstances prescribed by the CAC for which declaration for security assessment for cross-board transfer of data is required. Furthermore, on August 31, 2022, the CAC promulgated the Guidelines for filing the Outbound Data Transfer Security Assessment (Version 1)(《数据出境安全评估申报指南（第一版）》), which provides that acts of outbound data transfer include (i) overseas transmission and storage by data processors of data generated during mainland China domestic operations; (ii) the access to, use, download or export of the data collected and generated by data processors and stored in mainland China by overseas institutions, organizations or individuals; and (iii) other acts as specified by the CAC. Our principal business activities do not involve large numbers of registered users or deal with vast amount of user data. While we operate a small-scale online discussion forum for developers and therefore transmit and store limited amount of confidential and private information of our customers and others, such as personal information, including user accounts, phone numbers, and E-mail accounts, our online discussion forum is far less than one million of registered users. The Revised Review Measures and the Draft Regulations remain unclear on whether the relevant requirements will be applicable to companies, which have been listed in the United States, such as us. They also remain uncertain whether the future regulatory changes would impose additional restrictions on companies like us. We cannot predict the impact of the Revised Review Measures and the Draft Regulations, if any, at this stage, and we will closely monitor and assess any development in the rule-making process.

Cash Flows through our Company

Canaan Inc. is a Cayman Islands holding company with no operations of its own. We conduct our operations primarily through our PRC operating subsidiaries. As a result, although other means are available for us to obtain financing at the holding company level, the ability of Canaan Inc. to pay dividends to the shareholders and to service any debt it may incur may depend upon dividends primarily paid by our PRC subsidiaries. If any of our PRC subsidiaries incurs debt on its own behalf, the instruments governing such debt may restrict its ability to pay dividends to Canaan Inc. In addition, our PRC subsidiaries are permitted to pay dividends to Canaan Inc. only out of their retained earnings, if any, as determined in accordance with PRC accounting standards and regulations. Further, our PRC subsidiaries are required to make appropriations to certain statutory reserve funds or may make appropriations to certain discretionary funds, which are not distributable as cash dividends except in the event of a solvent liquidation of the companies. For more details, see “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—B. Liquidity and Capital Resources—Holding Company Structure.”

3

Table of Contents

Under PRC laws and regulations, our PRC subsidiaries are subject to certain restrictions with respect to paying dividends or otherwise transferring any of their net assets to us. Remittance of dividends by a wholly foreign-owned enterprise out of China is also subject to examination by the banks designated by State Administration of Foreign Exchange, or SAFE. These restrictions are benchmarked against the paid-up capital and the statutory reserve funds of our PRC subsidiaries. For risks relating to the fund flows of our operations in China, see “—D. Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Doing Business in the PRC—Our corporate structure may restrict our ability to receive dividends from, and transfer funds to, our PRC operating subsidiaries, which could restrict our ability to act in response to changing market conditions in a timely manner.” For the years ended December 31, 2020, 2021 and 2022, no dividends or distributions were made to Canaan Inc. by our PRC subsidiaries.

Under PRC law, Canaan Inc. may provide funding to our PRC subsidiaries only through capital contributions or loans, subject to satisfaction of applicable government registration and approval requirements. For the years ended December 31, 2020, 2021 and 2022, Canaan Inc. provided loans with principal amount of RMB111.6 million, RMB294.4 million and nil, respectively, to our PRC subsidiaries through our Hong Kong subsidiary. For the years ended December 31, 2020, 2021 and 2022, no cash generated from one of our subsidiaries were used to fund another subsidiary’s operations. And we do not have any policy in place that dictate such funding. As of date of this annual report, we have never faced difficulties or limitations on our ability to transfer cash between our subsidiaries.

Taxation on Dividends or Distributions

Canaan Inc. has not declared or paid any dividends on our ordinary shares since our inception, nor has any present plan to pay any dividends on our ordinary shares or ADSs in the foreseeable future. We currently intend to retain most, if not all, of our available funds and any future earnings to operate and expand our business. See “Item 8. Financial Information —A. Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information—Dividend Policy and Distributions.” For PRC and United States federal income tax considerations of an investment in our ADSs, see “Item 10. Additional Information—

E. Taxation.” Under the current laws of the Cayman Islands, Canaan Inc. is not subject to tax on income or capital gains. Upon payments of dividends to our shareholders, no Cayman Islands withholding tax will be imposed. For purposes of illustration, the following discussion reflects the hypothetical taxes that might be required to be paid within mainland China, assuming that: (i) we have taxable earnings, and (ii) we determine to pay a dividend in the future:

​

Notes:

Not required.

4

Table of Contents

Not required.

Risk Factor Summary

The following summary highlights some of the principal risks that could adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations. This summary is not complete and the risks summarized below are not the only risks we face. These risks are discussed more fully further below in this section entitled “Risk Factors.” These risks include, but are not limited to, the following:

Risks Relating to Our Business and Industry

5

Table of Contents

Risks Relating to Doing Business in the PRC

6

Table of Contents

Risks Relating to Doing Business in International Markets Outside the PRC

Risks Relating to the ADSs

An investment in our ADSs involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the following information about these risks, together with the other information appearing elsewhere in this annual report, before deciding to invest in our ordinary shares. The occurrence of any of the following risks could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and future growth prospects. In these circumstances, the market price of our ADSs could decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment.

Risks Relating to Our Business and Industry

Our results of operations have been and are expected to continue to be significantly impacted by the expected economic returns of Bitcoin mining.

Our revenues are primarily derived from the sales of Bitcoin mining machines and related parts, which are, in general, determined by the demand and pricing of our Bitcoin mining machines. Bitcoin miners’ purchasing behavior is primarily driven by the expected economic returns of Bitcoin mining. An increase in the Bitcoin price is one of significant factors that could increase the expected economic returns generated by Bitcoin mining activities and stimulate the demand and average selling price for our Bitcoin mining machines, and vice versa. Bitcoin price fluctuated significantly in the past few years and resulted in corresponding fluctuations of our sale of Bitcoin mining machines. We expect our results of operations to continue to be affected by the fluctuations of Bitcoin price, as a significant portion of our revenue is expected to come from the sales of Bitcoin mining machines and related parts. Any future significant reductions in the price of Bitcoin and Bitcoin network transaction fees, and/or the maintenance of a lower Bitcoin price for a long term will likely have a material and adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition. For example, if the Bitcoin price or Bitcoin network transaction fees drop and fail to recover, the expected economic return of Bitcoin mining activities will diminish, thereby resulting in a decrease in demand for our Bitcoin mining machines. As a result, we may need to reduce the price of our Bitcoin mining machines. At the same time, if transaction fees increase to such an extent as to discourage users from using Bitcoins as a medium of exchange, it may decrease the transaction volume of the Bitcoin network and may affect the demand for our Bitcoin mining machines. We cannot assure you that the Bitcoin price will remain high enough to sustain our operations or that the price of Bitcoin will not decline significantly in the future. Further, fluctuations in the Bitcoin price can have an immediate impact on the trading price of our shares even before our financial performance is affected, if at all.

In addition to the volatility of Bitcoin price, various other factors, mostly beyond our control, could impact the expected economic returns of Bitcoin mining as well, including, among others, the overall imbalanced supply and demand for bitcoin mining machines, the supply and availability of mining farm resources, changes in electricity costs or other operating costs, the total network computing power, the cost-efficiency and the depreciation of mining machines, and a variety of special economic, geopolitical and regulatory factors. Additionally, any shortage of power supply due to government control measures or other reasons, and any increase in energy costs, would raise the costs of Bitcoin mining. This in turn could affect our customers’ expected economic return for mining activities and the demand for and pricing of our Bitcoin mining machines.

7

Table of Contents

Furthermore, price reduction in our bitcoin mining machines due to a complex effect of fluctuations in Bitcoin price may subsequently affect the value of inventories as well as the provision we make to the inventory as we manage our inventories based on, among others, the sales forecast of our Bitcoin mining machines. As we generally increase our procurement volume and stock up finished goods for the launch of new products or we expect a surge of demand for Bitcoin mining machines, a significant drop in the Bitcoin price can lead to a lower expected sales price and excessive inventories, which in turn will lead to impairment losses with respect to such inventories. For example, as the Bitcoin price has fluctuated from the second half of 2022 to the first quarter of 2023, we continued to experience low demand and low prices in the Bitcoin mining machines market. Subsequently, another price drop on A12 series was offered in late March 2023, which in turn led to a further write-down to such inventories and related prepayments based on the most recent subsequent selling price, despite an inventories write-down recorded based on the price earlier. As a result, we recorded inventories write-down, prepayment write-down and provision for reserve for inventory purchase commitments of RMB629.4 million in 2022. If the Bitcoin price drops significantly in the future, we may make similar write-down again. Going forward, if we are able to sell such inventories above their cost, the cost of sales for those machines will be net of such write-down, which in turn will have the effect of increasing our gross profit for the period.

The Bitcoin price drop in the past has also caused our customers who purchased our Bitcoin mining products on credit to be less willing to make payments. We consider the portion of the contract price on credit and not yet collected as implicit price concession and we recognize revenue based on subsequent information regarding our collection of such portion of the contract price. In 2020, we recognized such price concessions of RMB11.5 million. We did not provide price concession in 2021 and 2022. We had ceased to provide credit sales for our clients since the second half of 2020, but we may offer sales on credit again to some of our customers in the future, and if the Bitcoin price drops significantly in the future, we will need to recognize such as implicit price concession.

We derive a significant portion of our revenues from our Bitcoin mining machines. If the market for Bitcoin mining machines ceases to exist or diminishes significantly, our business and results of operations would be materially harmed.

Historically, we generated substantially all of our revenues from the sales of our Bitcoin mining machines that incorporate our proprietary ASICs. In 2020, 2021 and 2022, sales of our Bitcoin mining machines and related parts and accessories accounted for 94.4%, 99.1% and 94.8% of our revenues, respectively. We may continue to generate a significant portion of our revenue from the sales of Bitcoin mining machines in the foreseeable future. If the market for Bitcoin mining machines ceases to exist or diminishes significantly, we would experience a significant loss of sales, cancelation of orders, or loss of customers for our Bitcoin mining machines. Adverse factors that may affect the market for Bitcoin mining machines include:

If we cannot maintain the scale and profitability of our Bitcoin mining machines or successfully expand our business in the AI market, our business, results of operations and ability to continue to grow will suffer. Furthermore, excess inventories, inventory markdowns, brand image deterioration and margin squeeze caused by declining economic returns for miners or pricing competition for our Bitcoin mining machines could all have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

8

Table of Contents

If we fail to succeed in the AI market or other new application markets we seek to penetrate into, our revenues, growth prospects and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected.

While we endeavor to expand our AI business, sales of Bitcoin mining machines continue to account for a substantial majority of our total revenue. Our AI revenue was RMB4.9 million, RMB17.0 million and RMB9.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2021 and 2022, respectively. Our future revenue growth of our AI business will depend largely on our ability to successfully expand our business in the AI market and penetrate into new application markets. We cannot predict how or to what extent the demand for our products in the AI market will develop going forward. Furthermore, as ASICs may not develop into mainstream solutions for AI technologies and applications, we might not be able to capitalize on the growth in the market for AI technologies and applications with our ASICs. If the AI market does not develop as we currently anticipate and we are unable to penetrate into new application markets, our future revenue and profits could be materially and adversely affected.

We plan to work closely with our partners in product development to enhance our visibility in new market trends and meet customer demand by devoting more resources to research and development. We may also need to recruit more employees for research and development and product development, such as software engineers. We intend to continue to capitalize on market opportunities for introducing new product applications and conduct advance planning for our next-generation products in a timely manner. However, if we fail to penetrate into any of these or other new markets to which we devote our resources, we may not be able to generate returns on our investments and our financial condition could suffer.

The industries in which we operate are characterized by constant changes. If we fail to continuously innovate and to provide products that meet the expectations of our customers, we may be unable to attract new customers or retain existing customers, and hence our business and results of operations may be adversely affected.

The industries in which we operate are characterized by constant changes, including rapid technological evolution, continual shifts in customer demands, frequent introductions of new products and solutions and constant emergence of new industry standards and practices. Thus, our success will depend, in part, on our ability to respond to these changes in a cost-effective and timely manner. We need to anticipate the emergence of new technologies and assess their market acceptance. We also need to invest significant resources in research and development in order to keep our products competitive in the market.

However, research and development activities are inherently uncertain, and we might encounter practical difficulties in commercializing our research and development results, which could result in excessive research and development expenses or delays. Given the fast pace with which blockchain and AI technologies have been and will continue to be developed, we may not be able to timely upgrade our technologies in an efficient and cost-effective manner, or at all. In addition, new developments in AI, deep learning, IoT, computer vision, blockchain and cryptocurrency could render our products obsolete or unattractive. If we are unable to keep up with the technological developments and anticipate market trends, or if our technologies or solutions become obsolete because of new technologies, our products may no longer be attractive to customers. As a result, our business, results of operations and financial condition would be materially and adversely affected.

As our current mining machines are designed for Bitcoin mining, any limitation on the usage and adaptation of Bitcoin and any actual or perceived adverse development in the Bitcoin market, which is rapidly and continuously evolving, can impact our results of operations. As there is no wide consensus with respect to the value and application of Bitcoin, any future development may continue to affect the price of Bitcoin and hence affect the demand for our current Bitcoin mining machines. In addition, any event or rumor that generates negative publicity for the Bitcoin industry and market, such as allegations that Bitcoin is used for money laundering or other illicit activities, could result in harm to our reputation, which in turn may negatively affect our results of operations.

Decentralization, or the lack of control by a central authority, is a key reason that cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin have attracted many committed users. However, the decentralized nature of Bitcoin is subject to growing discussion and suspicion. Some claim that most of the actual services and businesses built within the Bitcoin ecosystem are in fact centralized since they are run by specific people, in specific locations, with specific computer systems, and that they are susceptible to specific regulations. Individuals, companies or groups, as well as Bitcoin exchanges that own vast amounts of Bitcoins, can affect the market price of Bitcoin. Furthermore, mining equipment production and mining pool locations are becoming centralized. Some argue that the decentralized nature of cryptocurrencies is a fundamental flaw rather than a strength. The suspicion about the decentralized nature of Bitcoin may cause our customers to lose confidence in the prospect of the Bitcoin industry. This in turn could adversely affect the market demand for our Bitcoin mining machines and our business.

9

Table of Contents

We are subject to risks associated with legal, political or other conditions or developments regarding holding, using or mining of Bitcoins, which could negatively affect our business, results of operations and financial position.

Our customers are based globally. As such, our business could be significantly affected by, among other things, the regulatory and policy developments in countries and regions where we operate, such as China, United States, Singapore and Central Asia. Governmental authorities are likely to continue to issue new policies, laws, rules and regulations governing the blockchain and cryptocurrency industry we operate in and enhance enforcement of existing laws, rules and regulations.

In the recent years, the PRC government has been actively advancing a crackdown on Bitcoin mining and trading in China. For example, on May 21, 2021, the 51st meeting of the Financial Stability and Development Committee of the State Council announced a crackdown on bitcoin mining and trading activities in China. Accordingly, provincial authorities in the PRC have taken action to gradually crack down on cryptocurrency mining. For example, Sichuan Province ordered cryptocurrency mining in the province be “screened, cleaned up and terminated.” Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region and Qinghai Province have taken similar actions to stamp out cryptocurrency mining. On September 15, 2021, the People’s Bank of China, or PBOC, with nine other Chinese government authorities, jointly released the Circular on Further Preventing and Handling the Risks Concerning Speculation in Virtual Currency Trading (《关于进一步防范和处置虚拟货币交易炒作风险的通知》) (the “Circular No. 237”). Circular No. 237, for the first time, deems all cryptocurrency-related business activities, including: (i) exchanging legitimate currencies and cryptocurrencies or different types of crypto currencies for each other, (ii) trading cryptocurrencies as central counterparty, (iii) provision of intermediary services or pricing services for cryptocurrency transactions, (iv) issuance of tokens for financing, and (v) (for the first time) cryptocurrency related derivatives trading, as “illegal financial activities” that could involve illegal offerings of token notes, unauthorized public offerings of securities, illegal operation of futures business or illegal fundraising. It also provides that any cryptocurrency exchange offering services to Chinese residents from outside mainland China through the internet will also be regarded as conducting “illegal financial activities.” Also, on September 3, 2021, China’s National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) and nine other authorities jointly issued a Notice on Regulating Virtual Currency “Mining” Activities (《关于整治虚拟货币“挖矿”活动的通知》) (the “Circular No. 1283”) to restrict cryptocurrency mining activities in the PRC. Circular No. 1283 imposes an outright ban on greenfield cryptocurrency mining projects, by including cryptocurrency mining as an “obsolete industry” in the Catalogue for Guiding Industry Restructuring (《产业结构调整指导目录》) (the “Catalogue”), which effectively prohibits investments in projects falling within this category. The revised Catalogue came into effect on December 30, 2021. Circular No. 1283 also calls for existing cryptocurrency mining projects to be phased out at a quicker pace. Required actions include stopping and penalizing illicit power supply, differential electricity tariffs, withdrawing access to the power market, termination of financial and fiscal support and financial services for these projects, and phase-out within the time limits prescribed by the Catalogue. Any further order of the PRC government to limit, eliminate, clean up and terminate cryptocurrency mining may result in a crackdown on the cryptocurrency market and adversely affect the sales of our mining machine. While we have been actively exploring international market and have had 97.2% of our total revenue generated from sales of Bitcoin mining machines and related parts and coming from the customers who undertake mining activities in countries outside of the PRC in 2022, the long-term impact of such restrictions could be detrimental to our business and profitability, and our business and results of operation may suffer and investors in our ADSs may lose part or all of their investment if further extreme restrictions follow.

10

Table of Contents

Regulatory bodies in other jurisdictions, governmental or semi-governmental, have shown an interest in regulating or investigating companies engaged in the blockchain or cryptocurrency business. Restrictions imposed by the regulatory bodies in other jurisdictions may force us to restructure operations, perhaps significantly, which could result in significant costs and inefficiencies that harm our profitability, or even cause us to cease operations in the applicable jurisdiction. Cryptocurrency is a recent technological innovation and the regulatory schemes to which cryptocurrency and the related exchange may be subject have not been fully explored or developed in many countries. Thus, cryptocurrency faces an uncertain regulatory landscape in many countries. Some jurisdictions restrict various uses of cryptocurrencies, including the use of cryptocurrencies as a medium of exchange, the conversion between cryptocurrencies and fiat currencies or between cryptocurrencies, the provision of trading and other services related to cryptocurrencies by financial institutions and payment institutions, and initial coin offerings and other means of capital raising based on cryptocurrencies. We cannot assure you that these jurisdictions will not enact new laws or regulations that further restrict activities relate to cryptocurrencies. In addition, cryptocurrencies may be used by market participants for black market transactions, to conduct fraud, money laundering and terrorism-funding, tax evasion, economic sanction evasion or other illegal activities. As a result, governments may seek to regulate, restrict, control or ban the mining, use, holding and transferring of cryptocurrencies. We may not be able to eliminate all instances where other parties use Bitcoin mined with our Bitcoin mining machines to engage in money laundering or other illegal or improper activities. We cannot assure you that we will successfully detect and prevent all money laundering or other illegal or improper activities which may adversely affect our reputation, business, financial condition and results of operations. Furthermore, due to the environmental-impact concerns related to the potential high demand for electricity to support cryptocurrency mining activity, political concerns, and for other reasons, our customers may be required to cease mining operations without much or any prior notice by a national or local government’s formal or informal requirement or because of the anticipation of an impending requirement. For example, due to the most recent power shortage and political unrest in Central Asia, some Bitcoin mining farms temporarily suspended mining activities in Central Asia. Our business, financial condition and results of operations may be materially and adversely affected by these adverse changes in the regulatory and policy environment in the markets where we sell our Bitcoin mining machines and related parts.

Each of our operating subsidiaries in Hong Kong, Singapore and United States has a limited operating history, which makes it hard for us to evaluate their ability to generate revenue through operations, and to date, none of them has generated significant revenues.

Our operating subsidiaries in Hong Kong, Singapore and the United States were recently formed in recent years to explore the markets for our products outside the PRC. Their limited operating history makes it difficult for us to evaluate their current business and future prospects. They have encountered, and will continue to encounter, risks and difficulties frequently experienced by growing companies in rapidly developing and changing industries, including challenges in forecasting accuracy, determining appropriate uses of their limited resources, gaining market acceptance, managing a complex and evolving regulatory landscape and developing new products. These subsidiaries’ current or future operating model may require changes in order for them to scale their operations efficiently and be successful. Investors in our ADSs should consider the business and prospects of our subsidiaries in these countries in light of the risks and difficulties they face as early-stage companies.

We lack a significant operating history in the Bitcoin mining space, and our strategic focus on this relatively new business is subject to a number of significant risks and uncertainties that could affect our future viability.

We have recently adopted the development strategy to initiate the Bitcoin mining operations in international markets through collaborating with several cryptocurrency mining farms. However, there is a significant risk that we will be unable to achieve the anticipated benefits from such strategic collaborations, which would damage our business and could lead to the loss of our investment in Bitcoin mining, for a variety of reasons, including, among others:

11

Table of Contents

For all of these reasons, our plan to develop Bitcoin mining business may ultimately not be successful or will not achieve viable business scale or market acceptance.

Changes in the Bitcoin algorithm or the mining mechanism may materially and adversely affect our business and results of operations.

Our ASICs for Bitcoin mining machines are designed for the POW mechanism that the Bitcoin network uses to validate Bitcoin transactions. Another cryptocurrency that uses the POW mechanism is known as “Bitcoin cash,” developed in mid-2017, which our current Bitcoin mining machines can also mine. Many people within the Bitcoin community believe that POW is a foundation within Bitcoin’s code that should not be changed. However, there have been debates on mechanism change to avoid the “de facto control” by a great majority of the network computing power. With the possibility of a change in rule or protocol of the Bitcoin network, if our Bitcoin mining machines cannot be modified to accommodate any such changes, our Bitcoin mining machines will not be able to meet customer demand, and the results of our operations will be significantly affected. For more details, see “—The acceptance of Bitcoin network software patches or upgrades by a significant, but not overwhelming, percentage of the users and miners in the Bitcoin network could result in a “fork” in the blockchain, resulting in the operation of two separate networks that cannot be merged. The existence of forked blockchains could erode user confidence in Bitcoin and adversely impact our business, results of operations and financial condition.”

Substantial increases in the supply of mining machines connected to the Bitcoin network would lead to an increase in network capacity, which in turn would increase mining difficulty. This development would negatively affect the economic returns of Bitcoin mining activities, which would decrease the demand for and/or pricing of our products.

The difficulty of Bitcoin mining, or the amount of computational resources required for a set amount of reward for recording a new block, directly affects the expected economic returns for Bitcoin miners, which in turn affects the demand for our Bitcoin mining machines. Bitcoin mining difficulty is a measure of how much computing power is required to record a new block and it is affected by the total amount of computing power in the Bitcoin network. The Bitcoin algorithm is designed so that one block is generated, on average, every ten minutes, no matter how much computing power is in the network. Thus, as more computing power joins the network, and assuming the rate of block creation does not change (remaining at one block generated every ten minutes), the amount of computing power required to generate each block and hence the mining difficulty increases. In other words, based on the current design of the Bitcoin network, Bitcoin mining difficulty would increase together with the total computing power available in the Bitcoin network, which is in turn affected by the number of Bitcoin mining machines in operation.

Additionally, the amount of Bitcoin awarded for solving each block is designed to decline approximately every four years, with the most recent halving event occurred in May 2020. As a result, a strong growth in sales of our Bitcoin mining machines can contribute to further growth in the total computing power in the network, thereby driving up the difficulty of Bitcoin mining and coupled with the decrease in Bitcoin reward, resulting in downward pressure on the expected economic return of Bitcoin mining and the demand for, and pricing of, our products, under the assumption that the price of Bitcoin does not increase enough.

12

Table of Contents

We may be unable to make the substantial research and development investments that are required to remain competitive in our business.

Advances in AI technology, Bitcoin mining technology and the semiconductor industry have led to increased demand for ICs of higher speed and power efficiency for solving computational problems of increasing complexity. In 2020, 2021 and 2022, we incurred research and development expense of RMB140.0 million, RMB332.8 million and RMB546.6 million (US$79.3 million), respectively. We are committed to investing in new product development in order to stay competitive in our markets. Driven by market demand, we intend to continue to broaden and enhance our product portfolio in order to deliver the most effective solutions to our customers. Nevertheless, if we are unable to generate enough revenue or raise enough capital to make adequate research and development investments going forward, our product development and relevant research and development initiatives may be restricted or delayed, or we may not be able to keep pace with the latest market trends and satisfy our customers’ needs, which could materially and adversely affect our results of operations. Furthermore, our substantial research and development expenditures may not yield the expected results that enable us to roll out new products, which in turn will harm our prospects and results of operations.

We face intense competition and our competitors may employ aggressive pricing strategies, which can lead to a price reduction of our products and material adverse effect on our results of operations.

We operate in highly competitive industries for Bitcoin mining machines and AI products, and we may look to enter into markets with very competitive landscapes. Our competitors include many well-known domestic and international players, and we face competitors that are larger than us and have advantages over us in terms of economies of scale and financial and other resources. We expect that competition in our markets will continue to be intense, as we compete not only with existing players that have been focusing on Bitcoin mining or AI, but also new entrants that include well- established players in the semiconductor industry, or players who have not been predisposed to this industry in the past. Some of these competitors may also have stronger brand names, greater access to capital, longer histories, longer relationships with their suppliers or customers and more resources than we do. Furthermore, these competitors may be able to adapt to changes in the industry more promptly and efficiently. Intense competition from existing and potential competitors could result in material price reductions in the products we sell or a decrease in our market share. Aggressive pricing strategies by our competitors and an abundant supply of Bitcoin mining machines or AI products in the market may cause us to reduce the prices of our products and also negatively affect the demand for our products or harm our profitability. If we fail to compete effectively and efficiently or fail to adapt to changes in the competitive landscape, our business, financial condition and results of operations may be materially and adversely affected.

Our Bitcoin mining machine business depends on supplies from limited numbers of third-party foundry partners, and any failure to obtain sufficient foundry capacity from these third-party foundry partners would significantly delay the shipment of our products.

As a fabless IC design company, we do not own any IC fabrication facilities and outsource the fabrication process of our ICs to third-party foundry partners. In 2020, the value of the wafers we purchased from the three major third-party foundry partners accounted for 66.1% of our total procurement of the year ended December 31, 2020. In 2021, the value of the wafers we purchased from the two major third-party foundry partners accounted for 66.0% of our total procurement of the year ended December 31, 2021. In 2022, the value of the wafers we purchased from the three major third-party foundry partners accounted for 76.2% of our total procurement of the year ended December 31, 2022. It is important for us to have a reliable relationship with our current and future third-party foundry partners to ensure adequate product supply to respond to customer demand.

As we rely on limited numbers of third-party foundry partners, we cannot guarantee that they will be able to meet our manufacturing requirements. The ability of our third-party foundry partners to provide us with foundry services is limited by their technology migration, available capacity, existing obligations and global semiconductor supply. In particular, we have experienced a global shortage in semiconductors beginning 2021, which may have adversely impacted the production activity and capacity of our third-party foundry partners. If these third-party foundry partners fail to succeed in their technology migration or secure enough semiconductors, they will not be able to deliver to us qualified ICs in a sufficient amount, which will significantly affect our technological advancement and shipment of Bitcoin mining machines. This could in turn result in lost sales and have a material adverse effect on our relationships with our customers and on our business and financial condition.

13

Table of Contents

In addition, we depend on our third-party foundry partners to allocate to us a portion of their manufacturing capacity sufficient to meet our needs, to produce products of acceptable quality and at acceptable final test yields and to deliver those products to us on a timely basis and at acceptable prices. If our third-party foundry partners raise their prices or are unable to meet our required capacity for any reason, such as shortages or delays in the shipment of semiconductor equipment or raw materials required to manufacture our ICs, or if our business relationships with them deteriorate, we may not be able to obtain the required capacity and would have to seek alternative foundries, which may not be available on commercially reasonable terms, or at all. Moreover, it is possible that other customers of our third-party foundry partners that are larger and/or better financed than we are, or that have long-term contracts with them, may receive preferential treatment in terms of capacity allocation or pricing. In addition, if we do not accurately forecast our capacity needs, our third-party foundry partners may not have available capacity to meet our immediate needs or we may be required to pay higher costs to fulfill those needs, either of which could materially and adversely affect our business, operating results or financial condition.

In particular, the production of our ASICs may require advanced IC fabrication technologies, and foundries other than our third-party foundry partners might not have sufficient production capacity for such technologies, if at all, to meet our requirements. This may expose us to risks associated with engaging new foundries. For example, using foundries with which we have not established relationships could expose us to potentially unfavorable pricing, unsatisfactory quality or insufficient capacity allocation. We have historically contracted with a single foundry for a specific generation of our ASICs, which means that the failure, for whatever reason, of a single third-party foundry partner could materially and adversely affect a whole generation of our products.

Other risks associated with our dependence on a few third-party foundry partners include limited control over delivery schedules and quality assurance, lack of capacity in periods of excess demand, unauthorized use of our intellectual property and limited ability to manage inventory and parts. In particular, although we have entered into confidentiality agreements with our third-party foundry partners for the protection of our intellectual property, it may not protect our intellectual property with the same degree of care as we use to protect our intellectual property. See “—If we fail to adequately protect our IP rights, our ability to compete effectively or to defend ourselves from litigation could be impaired, which could reduce our total revenue and increase our costs.” If we fail to properly manage any of these risks, our business and results of operations may be materially and adversely affected.

Moreover, if any of our third-party foundry partners suffers any damage to its facilities, suspends manufacturing operations, loses benefits under material agreements, experiences power outages or computer virus attacks, lacks sufficient capacity to manufacture our products, encounters financial difficulties, is unable to secure necessary raw materials from its suppliers or suffers any other disruption or reduction in efficiency, we may encounter supply delays or disruptions.

Failure to maintain inventory levels in line with the approximate level of demand for our products could cause us to lose sales, expose us to increased inventory risks and subject us to increases in holding costs, risk of inventory obsolescence, increases in markdown allowances and write- offs, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

To operate our business successfully and meet our customers’ demands and expectations, we must maintain a certain level of finished goods inventory to ensure immediate delivery when required. Furthermore, we are required to maintain an appropriate level of inventory of parts and components for our production. However, forecasts are inherently uncertain. If our forecasted demand is lower than actual demand, we may not be able to maintain an adequate inventory level of our finished goods or produce our products in a timely manner, and we may lose sales and market share to our competitors. On the other hand, we may also be exposed to increased inventory risks due to accumulated excess inventory of our products or raw materials, parts and components for our products. Excess inventory levels may lead to increases in inventory holding costs, risks of inventory obsolescence and write-down. We recorded inventories write-down, prepayment write-down and provision for reserve for inventory purchase commitments of RMB44.9 million, RMB50,7 million and RMB629.4 million (US$91.3 million) in 2020, 2021 and 2022, respectively. The carrying value of our inventories was RMB225.5 million, RMB812.4 million and RMB1,474.0 million (US$213.7 million) as of December 31, 2020, 2021 and 2022, respectively.

14

Table of Contents

The average selling prices of our products may decrease from time to time due to technological advancement and we may not be able to pass onto our suppliers such decreases, which may in turn adversely affect our profitability.

The IC design industry is characterized by rapid launches of new products, continuous technological advancements and changing market trends and customer preferences, all of which translate to a shorter life cycle and a gradual decrease in the average selling prices of products over time. Because we compete in the environment of rapidly-evolving technology advancement and market trends and developments of the IC design industry, there are no assurances that we will be able to pass on any decrease in average selling prices of our products to our suppliers. In the event that average selling prices of our products unusually or significantly decrease and such decreases cannot be offset by a corresponding decrease in the prices of the principal components of our products, our gross profit margins may be materially and adversely affected, which in turn, may adversely affect our profitability.

Our limited operating history and rapid revenue growth may make it difficult for us to forecast our business and assess the seasonality and volatility in our business.

As the markets for Bitcoin mining machines and AI applications are relatively young and still developing, we cannot forecast longer-term demand or order patterns for our products. Because of our limited operating history and historical data, as well as the limited visibility into future demand trends for our products, we may not be able to accurately forecast our future total revenue and budget our operating expenses accordingly. As most of our expenses are fixed in the short-term or incurred in advance of anticipated total revenue, we may not be able to adjust our expenses in a timely manner in order to offset any shortfall in revenue.

Our business is subject to the varying order patterns of the Bitcoin mining machine and AI products markets. In addition, many of the regions in which our products are purchased have varying holiday seasons that differ from traditional patterns observed by other semiconductor suppliers and these seasonal buying patterns can impact our sales. We have experienced fluctuations in orders during our limited operating history, and we expect such volatility to occur in the future. Though we have experienced significant revenue growth in the past, there is no guarantee that our revenue will continue to grow or at all. If we or any of our third-party manufacturing service providers are unable to increase production of new or existing products to meet any increases in demand due to seasonality or other factors, our total revenue would be adversely affected and our reputation with our customers may be damaged. Conversely, if we overestimate customer demand, we may reduce our orders or delay shipments of our products from units forecasted, and our total revenue in a particular period could be lower than expected.

We may be unable to execute our growth strategies or effectively maintain our rapid growth trends.

Historically, we have grown our scale of operations rapidly while our revenues experienced fluctuations due to, among others, the fluctuations of Bitcoin prices. We may not be able to grow our revenue in the future if we are not able to successfully execute our product development and diversification, geographic expansion and other growth plans. In addition, our rapid growth has placed and will continue to place significant demands on our management and our administrative, operational, research and development and financial resources.

To accomplish our growth strategies and manage the future growth of our operations, we will be required to enhance our research and development capabilities, improve our operational and financial systems, and expand, train and manage our growing employee base. Furthermore, we need to maintain and expand our relationships with our customers, suppliers, research institutions, third-party manufacturers and other third parties. Moreover, as we introduce new products or enter new markets, we may face new market, technological, operational and regulatory risks and challenges with which we are unfamiliar.

Our current and planned operations, personnel, systems, internal procedures and controls may not be adequate to support our future growth and expansion. In addition, the success of our growth strategies depends on a number of external factors, such as the growth of the semiconductor market and the demand for Bitcoin, the level of competition we face and evolving customer behavior and preferences. If we are unable to execute our growth strategies or manage our growth effectively, we may not be able to capture market opportunities or respond to competitive pressures, which may materially and adversely affect our business prospects and results of operations.

15

Table of Contents

We rely on limited numbers of third parties to package and test our products.

In addition to IC fabrication, we rely on limited numbers of production partners for the testing and packaging of our ASICs. Reliance on these third parties for the testing and packaging of our ASICs presents significant risks to us, including the following:

The ability and willingness of our production partners to adequately and timely perform is largely beyond our control. If one or more of these production partners fails to perform its obligations in a timely manner or at satisfactory quality levels, our ability to bring products to market and our reputation could suffer. If these production partners fail to deliver quality products and components to us on time and at reasonable prices, we could face difficulties in fulfilling our customers’ orders, our total revenue could decline and our business, financial condition and results of operations would be adversely affected.

Bitcoin exchanges and wallets, and to a lesser extent, the Bitcoin network itself, may suffer from hacking and fraud risks, which may adversely erode user confidence in Bitcoin which would decrease the demand for our Bitcoin mining machines.

Bitcoin transactions are entirely digital and, as with any virtual system, are at risk from hackers, malware and operational glitches. Hackers can target Bitcoin exchanges and Bitcoin transactions, to gain access to thousands of accounts and digital wallets where Bitcoins are stored. Bitcoin transactions and accounts are not insured by any type of government program and all Bitcoin transactions are permanent because there is no third party or payment processor. Bitcoin has suffered from hacking and cyber-theft as such incidents have been reported by several cryptocurrency exchanges and miners, highlighting concerns about the security of Bitcoin and therefore affecting its demand and price. Also, the price and exchange of Bitcoin may be affected due to fraud risk. While Bitcoin uses private key encryption to verify owners and register transactions, fraudsters and scammers may attempt to sell false Bitcoins. All of the above may adversely affect the operation of the Bitcoin network which would erode user confidence in Bitcoin, which would negatively affect demand for our products.

We have incurred negative cash flows from operating activities and net losses in the past and can provide no assurance of our future operating results.

In 2020, we experienced positive cash flow from operating activities of RMB42.3 million despite a net loss of RMB215.1 million. In 2021, we experienced positive cash flow from operating activities of RMB1,438.9 million and generated a net income of RMB2,000.3 million. In 2022, we generated net income of RMB486.4 million, while experienced negative cash flow from operating activities of RMB1,696.7 million. We cannot assure you that we will be able to generate positive cash flow from operating activities in the future or that we will be able to continue to obtain financing on acceptable terms or at all. Our ability to achieve profitability and positive cash flow from operating activities will depend on a mix of factors, some of which are beyond our control, including the price of Bitcoin, up-front investment for our mining business, our ability to grow our AI business and manage our product mix and our ability to secure favorable commercial terms from suppliers.

16

Table of Contents

Shortages in, or increases in the prices of, the components of our products may adversely affect our business.

In addition to our proprietary ASICs, the components we use for our Bitcoin mining machines include printed circuit board, other electronic components, fans and aluminum casings. The use of our Bitcoin mining machines also requires certain ancillary equipment and components such as controllers, power adaptors and connectors. The production of our current Bitcoin mining machines depends on obtaining adequate supplies of these components on a timely basis and at competitive prices. We do not typically maintain large inventories of components, but rather we purchase them on a just-in-time basis from various third-party component manufacturers that satisfy our quality standards and meet our volume requirements. Given the long lead times that may be required to manufacture, assemble and deliver certain components and products, problems could arise in planning production and managing inventory levels that could seriously interrupt our operations, including the possibility of defective parts, an increase in component costs, delays in delivery schedules, and shortages of components. Furthermore, we may have to turn to less reputable suppliers if we cannot source adequate components from our regular suppliers. Under such circumstances, the quality of the components may suffer and could cause performance issues in our Bitcoin mining machines.

Shortages of components could result in reduced production or delays in production, as well as an increase in production costs, which may negatively affect our abilities to fulfill orders or make timely shipments to customers, as well as our customer relationships and profitability. Component shortages may also increase our costs of revenue because we may be required to pay higher prices for components in short supply, not being able to pass such costs to customers, and redesign or reconfigure products to accommodate substitute components.

Our prepayments to suppliers may subject us to counterparty risk associated with such suppliers and negatively affect our liquidity and cash position.

We may incur net cash outflows at an early stage of our production because we are required to prepay our third-party foundry partners before the service is provided in order to secure the third-party foundry partners’ production capacity. As of December 31, 2020, 2021 and 2022, the outstanding balance of prepayments we made to our third-party foundry partners amounted to RMB182.6 million, RMB1,299.8 million and RMB1,049.2 million (US$152.1 million), respectively. The amount of our prepayments can significantly increase at the beginning of our launch of advanced products in the future. We are subject to counterparty risk exposure to our suppliers. Any failure by our suppliers to perform their contractual obligations in a timely manner and/or in accordance with our requested quality may result in us not being able to fulfill customers’ orders accordingly. In such event, we may not be able to receive back the prepayments in a timely manner or in full, notwithstanding that our suppliers are obligated to return such prepayments upon meeting certain conditions. Furthermore, such prepayments also put cash pressure on us and if the cash outflows for the prepayments significantly exceed the cash inflows during any period, our future liquidity and cash position will be adversely affected.

If we experience difficulty in collecting our trade receivables, our liquidity, financial condition and results of operations would be negatively impacted.

We derive our revenues from the sale of products and are subject to counterparty risks such as our customer’s inability to pay. As of December 31, 2020, 2021 and 2022, our trade receivables amounted to RMB7.1 million, RMB0.4 million and nil, respectively. We may have trade receiavbles in the future and there can be no assurance that we will be able to collect our trade receivables on a timely basis, and our trade receivable turnover days may increase, which in turn could materially and adversely affect our liquidity, financial condition and results of operations.

Failure at tape-out or failure to achieve the expected final test yields for our ASICs could negatively impact our operating results.

The tape-out process is a critical milestone in our business. A successful tape-out means all the stages in the design and verification process of our ASICs have been completed, and the product is ready to be sent for manufacturing. A tape-out is either a success or a failure, and in the latter case design modifications are needed. The tape-out process is very costly, and repeated failures can significantly increase our costs, lengthen our product development period and delay our product launch. While we have achieved multiple tape-out in the initial batch historically, we cannot assure you that we will be able to continue to have a high tape-out success rate in the future.

17

Table of Contents

Once tape-out is successful, the ASIC design is sent for manufacturing, and the final test yield is a measurement of the production success rate. The final test yield is a function of both product design, which is developed by us, and process technology, which typically belongs to a third-party foundry. While we have historically achieved high final test yields, we cannot assure you that we will be able to maintain such yields in the future. Low final test yields can result from either a product design deficiency or a process technology failure or a combination of both. As such, we may not be able to identify problems causing low final test yields until our product designs go to the manufacturing stage, which may substantially increase our per unit costs and delay the launch of new products.

For example, if any of our third-party foundry partners experiences manufacturing inefficiencies or encounters disruptions, errors or difficulties during production, we may fail to achieve acceptable final test yields or experience product delivery delays. We cannot be certain that such third-party foundry partner will be able to develop, obtain or successfully implement process technologies needed to manufacture future generations of our products on a timely basis. Moreover, during the periods in which foundries are implementing new process technologies, their manufacturing facilities may not be fully productive. A substantial delay in the technology transitions to smaller geometry process technologies could have a material and adverse effect on us, particularly if our competitors transition to such technologies before us.

In addition, resolution of yield problems requires cooperation among us, our third-party foundry partners and package and test partners. We cannot assure you that the cooperation will be successful and that any yield problems can be fixed.

The acceptance of Bitcoin network software patches or upgrades by a significant, but not overwhelming, percentage of the users and miners in the Bitcoin network could result in a “fork” in the blockchain, resulting in the operation of two separate networks that cannot be merged. The existence of forked blockchains could erode user confidence in Bitcoin and could adversely impact our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Bitcoin is based on open source software and has no official developer or group of developers that formally controls the Bitcoin network. Any individual can download the Bitcoin network software and make any desired modifications, which are proposed to users and miners on the Bitcoin network through software downloads and upgrades. However, miners and users must consent to those software modifications by downloading the altered software or upgrade implementing the changes; otherwise, the changes do not become part of the Bitcoin network. Since the Bitcoin network’s inception, changes to the Bitcoin network have been accepted by the vast majority of users and miners, ensuring that the Bitcoin network remains a coherent economic system. However, a developer or group of developers could potentially propose a modification to the Bitcoin network that is not accepted by a vast majority of miners and users, but that is nonetheless accepted by a substantial population of participants in the Bitcoin network. In such a case, a fork in the blockchain could develop and two separate Bitcoin networks could result, one running the pre-modification software program and the other running the modified version. An example is the introduction of a cryptocurrency known as “Bitcoin cash” in mid-2017. This kind of split in the Bitcoin network could erode user confidence in the stability of the Bitcoin network, which could negatively affect the demand for our products.

AI technologies are constantly evolving, and any flaws in or misuse of AI, even if committed by other third parties, could have a negative impact on our business, reputation, brands and the general acceptance of AI solutions by society.

AI technologies are still in a preliminary stage of development and are constantly evolving. As with many disruptive innovations, AI presents risks and challenges that could affect user perception and its adoption. Any flaws in or insufficiencies of AI, and any inappropriate or premature usage thereof, whether actual or perceived, and whether by us or by other third parties, may dissuade prospective customers from adopting AI solutions, and may impair the general acceptance of AI by society. Moreover, AI is covered extensively, and in many instances critically, by various news media across the world. There is no assurance that our AI products will not be misused or applied in a way that is inconsistent with public expectations. Any misuse of our AI technologies, whether actual or perceived, and whether by us or by other third parties, could negatively impact our brands and reputation, and in turn our business, financial condition and results of operation.

18

Table of Contents

Any failure of our products to meet the necessary quality standards could adversely affect our reputation, business and results of operation.

The quality of our products is critical to the success of our business and depends significantly on the effectiveness of our and our manufacturing service providers’ quality control systems. In our efforts to quickly meet new market trends and demand and adopt new technologies, our products may not have adequate time to go through our normal rigorous testing procedures and final inspection, which could result in instances where our products cannot reach the required performance standard, or our products are found to be defective. These instances could result in our customers suffering losses. Defects detected before product delivery to our customers may result in additional costs for remediation and rework. Defects detected after the delivery and installation of our products may result in our incurring further costs relating to inspection, installation, remediation or product return, which may result in damages to our reputation, loss of customers, government fines and disputes and litigation.

In addition, we outsourced to certain production partners a portion of our product manufacturing process, which require them to purchase parts and components from other third-party suppliers. Although we carry out quality inspections for the manufacturing process and the parts and components purchased, we cannot assure you that we will always be able to detect defects in the manufacturing process or the parts and components purchased. Any defect in such manufacturing process or parts and components purchased may lead to defects in our finished products, which may in turn increase our costs as well as damage our reputation and market share. We may not be able to procure contractual or other indemnities from the suppliers of the defective parts and components adequately, or at all. We may be subject to product liability claims and litigation for compensation, which could result in substantial and unexpected expenditures and could materially and adversely affect our cash flow and operating results.

Our Bitcoin mining machines use open source software and hardware as their basic controller system, which may subject us to certain risks.

We use open source software and hardware in our Bitcoin mining machines. For example, the AvalonMiner controller open source software needs to be installed on open source Raspberry Pi hardware, which serves as the basic controller system for the AvalonMiner, and we expect to continue to use Raspberry Pi and other open source software and hardware in the future. We may face claims from others claiming ownership of, or seeking to enforce the terms of, an open source license, including by demanding the release of the open source software, derivative works or our proprietary source code that was developed using such software. These claims could also result in litigation, requiring us to purchase a costly license or to devote additional research and development resources to change our technologies, either of which would have a negative effect on our business and operating results. In addition, if the license terms for the open source software we utilize change, we may be forced to re-engineer or discontinue our solutions or incur additional costs.

If we are unable to maintain or enhance our brand recognition, our business, financial condition and results of operations may be materially and adversely affected.

Maintaining and enhancing the recognition, image and acceptance of our brand are important to our ability to differentiate our products from and to compete effectively with our peers. Our brand image, however, could be jeopardized if we fail to maintain high product quality, pioneer and keep pace with evolving technology trends, or timely fulfill the orders for our products. If we fail to promote our brand or to maintain or enhance our brand recognition and awareness among our customers, or if we are subject to events or negative allegations affecting our brand image or the publicly perceived position of our brand, our business, operating results and financial condition could be adversely affected.

Power shortages, labor disputes and other factors may result in constraints on our production activities.

In March 2022, the COVID-19 resurgence, together with the resulting travel restrictions and quarantine measures, caused disruptions in the operations of our assembly plant in the PRC, which resulted in delays in the shipment of products to certain of our customers. There can be no assurance that our operations will not be further materially affected by power shortages, labor disputes, pandemics (e.g. COVID-19) or other factors in the future, thereby causing material production disruptions and delays in our delivery schedule. In such event, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected.

19

Table of Contents

As we enter into Bitcoin mining business, we will be subject to risks associated with our need for significant electrical power.

Bitcoin mining operations require significant amounts of electrical power, and, as we enter into Bitcoin mining business, we anticipate our demand and/or our partners’ demand for electrical power will grow significantly. If we or our partners are unable to obtain sufficient electrical power on a cost-effective basis, we may not realize the anticipated benefits of our significant capital investments in the Bitcoin mining business.

Our Bitcoin mining business may also be materially adversely affected by the restrictions of government regulators in the jurisdictions where we operate on the energy usage of Bitcoin mining. Government regulators may restrict the ability of electricity suppliers to provide electricity to Bitcoin mining operations in times of electricity shortage, or may otherwise potentially restrict or prohibit the provision of electricity to Bitcoin mining operations. Moreover, if Bitcoin mining becomes more widespread, government scrutiny related to restrictions on Bitcoin mining facilities and their energy consumption may significantly increase. The considerable consumption of electricity by Bitcoin mining operation may also have a negative environmental impact, including contribution to climate change, which could set the public opinion against allowing the use of electricity for Bitcoin mining activities or create a negative consumer sentiment and perception of Bitcoin, specifically, or cryptocurrencies, generally. This, in turn, could lead to governmental measures restricting or prohibiting Bitcoin mining or the use of electricity for Bitcoin mining activities. Additionally, our mining operations could be materially adversely affected by power outages and similar disruptions. Given the power requirements for our Bitcoin mining machines, it would not be feasible to run our machines on back-up power generators in the event of a government restriction on electricity or a power outage. If we are unable to receive adequate power supply and are forced to reduce our operations due to the unavailability or cost of electrical power, it would have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition and operating results.

If we fail to adequately protect our IP rights, our ability to compete effectively or to defend ourselves from litigation could be impaired, which could reduce our total revenue and increase our costs.

We rely primarily on a combination of protections provided by patent, IC layout and design rights, copyright, trademark and trade secret laws, as well as confidentiality, non-compete and non-disclosure agreements and other means for protecting our proprietary technologies and know-how.

However, we cannot assure you that the strategies and steps we are taking are sufficient to protect our intellectual property rights or that, notwithstanding legal protection, others do not or will not infringe or misappropriate our intellectual property rights. If we fail to adequately protect our intellectual property rights, or if changes in laws diminish or remove the current legal protections available to them, the competitiveness of our products may be eroded and our business could suffer. The rights granted to us under our patents, IC layout-design rights and copyrights, including prospective rights sought in our pending patent applications, may not be meaningful or provide us with any commercial advantage. In addition, they could be opposed, contested, circumvented or designed around by our competitors or be declared invalid or unenforceable in judicial or administrative proceedings. Any failure of our patents, IC layout-design rights and copyrights to adequately protect our technologies may allow our competitors to offer similar products or technologies. We may not be able to protect our IP rights in some countries where our products are sold or may be sold in the future. Even if IP rights are granted outside of the PRC, effective enforcement in those countries may not be available to us, primarily due to the relatively weak legal regime protecting IP rights in those countries and the difficulties to defend and enforce such rights. Accordingly, we may not be able to effectively protect our IP rights in those countries. Many companies have encountered substantial intellectual property infringement in countries where we sell or intend to sell our products.

Monitoring unauthorized use of our IP is difficult and costly. Unauthorized use of our IP may have occurred or may occur without our knowledge. Any failure by us to effectively protect our IP could reduce the value of our technologies and impair our ability to compete. We may in the future need to initiate infringement claims or litigation. Litigation can be expensive and time-consuming and may divert the efforts of our technical staff and managerial personnel, which could result in lower total revenue and higher expenses, whether or not such litigation results in a determination favorable to us.

20

Table of Contents

We may face IP infringement claims or other related disputes, which could be time-consuming, costly to defend or settle and result in the loss of significant rights and lower sales.

As is typical in the semiconductor industry, we may be subject to infringement claims from time to time or otherwise become aware of potentially relevant patents or other IP rights held by other parties that may cover some of our technology, products and services. The semiconductor industry is characterized by companies that hold large numbers of patents and other IP rights and that vigorously pursue, protect and enforce these rights. Patent litigation has increased in recent years owing to increased assertions made by IP licensing entities and increasing competition and overlap of product functionality in our markets. Additionally, we have in the past entered and may continue in the future to enter into licensing agreements with third parties for the use of their proprietary technologies, primarily software development tools, in the development of our products. As with any business relationship, we may face disputes and lawsuits related to those IP licensing agreements. As our operations continue to grow in size and scale, the likelihood of us becoming involved in IP related lawsuits and disputes to protect or defend our IP rights and the use of third-party IP rights will increase.

In addition, it is extremely difficult for us to monitor all of the patent applications that have been filed in the PRC, the United States or in other countries or regions and whether, if such pending patents are granted, such patents would have a material and adverse effect on our business if our product and service offering were to infringe upon them.

Other third parties may file claims against us or our customers alleging that our products, processes, or technologies infringe third-party patents or IP rights. Regardless of their merits or resolutions, such claims could be costly to defend or settle and could divert the efforts and attention of our management and technical personnel. In addition, some of our customer agreements in the future may require us to indemnify and defend our customers from third-party infringement claims and to pay damages in the case of adverse rulings. As such, claims of this sort also could harm our relationships with our customers and may deter future customers from doing business with us. We do not know whether we could prevail in any such proceeding given the complex technical issues and inherent uncertainties involved in IP litigation. If any pending or future proceedings result in an adverse outcome, we could be required to:

Any of the foregoing results could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The loss of any member of our senior management team, or our failure to attract, train and retain qualified personnel, especially our design and technical personnel, could impair our ability to grow our business and effectively execute our business strategy.

Since our inception, the growth and expansion of our business operations have been dependent upon the business strategies and foresight of our senior management. Our future success depends, in large part, on the continued contributions of our senior management team, especially Mr. Nangeng Zhang.

21

Table of Contents

In addition, our future success depends on our ability to retain, attract and incentivize qualified personnel, including our management, sales, marketing, finance and especially research and development personnel. As the driver of our technological and product innovations, our research and development personnel represent a very significant asset of ours. As the technology in the semiconductor industry is advancing at a quick pace, there is an increasing need for skilled engineers. Many companies across the world are struggling to find suitable candidates for their research and development positions. The process of hiring employees with the combination of skills and characteristics required to implement our strategy can be extremely competitive and time-consuming. We cannot assure you that we will be able to attract adequate personnel as we continue to pursue our business strategies.

Moreover, we cannot assure you that we will be able to retain key existing employees. The loss of any of our senior management or research and development team members could harm our ability to implement our business strategies and respond to the rapidly changing market conditions in which we operate, or could result in other operating risks. The loss of one or more of our key employees, especially our key design and technical personnel which includes our co-founders, or our inability to retain, attract and motivate qualified design and technical personnel, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our corporate actions are significantly influenced by our principal shareholders, including Mr. Nangeng Zhang, our chairman and chief executive officer, who have the ability to exert significant influence over important corporate matters that require approval of shareholders while their interests may differ from those of the other shareholders. This may deprive you of the opportunity to receive a premium for your ADSs and materially reduce the value of your investment.

Our share capital is designated into Class A ordinary shares and Class B ordinary shares. Each Class A ordinary share is entitled to one vote and each Class B ordinary share is entitled to 15 votes at general meetings of our shareholders. Mr. Nangeng Zhang, our chairman and chief executive officer, beneficially own 100% of our Class B ordinary shares, representing approximately 65.2% of the aggregate voting power of our issued and outstanding share capital as of December 31, 2022. However, the interests of our chairman and chief executive officer may differ from the interests of other shareholders. This concentration of ownership and the protective provisions in our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association may discourage, delay or prevent a change in control of our company, which could have the dual effect of depriving our shareholders of an opportunity to receive a premium for their shares as part of a sale of our company and reducing the price of the ADSs. We may not be able to enter into other transactions that could be beneficial to us without the consent of our chairman and chief executive officer. As a result of the foregoing, the value of your investment could be materially reduced.

We are a “controlled company” under the Nasdaq Stock Market Rules and, as a result, will rely on exemptions from certain corporate governance requirements that provide protection to shareholders of other companies.

We are a “controlled company” within the meaning of the Nasdaq corporate governance standards, as Mr. Nangeng Zhang, our chairman and chief executive officer, holds more than 50% of the aggregate voting power of our total issued and outstanding share capital. Under the Nasdaq rules, a controlled company is exempt from certain Nasdaq corporate governance requirements, including the requirements:

Although we have similar practices, they do not entirely conform to the Nasdaq requirements; therefore, we currently use these exemptions and intend to continue using them. Accordingly, investors will not have the same protections provided to shareholders of companies that are subject to all Nasdaq corporate governance requirements.

22

Table of Contents

We may engage in acquisitions or strategic alliances that could disrupt our business, result in increased expenses, reduce our financial resources and cause dilution to our shareholders. We cannot assure you that such acquisitions or strategic alliances may be successfully implemented.

Although we have not engaged in acquisitions or strategic alliances in the past, we may look for potential acquisitions or strategic alliances in the future to expand our business. However, we may not be able to find suitable acquisition candidates, complete acquisitions on favorable terms, if at all, or integrate any acquired business, products or technologies into our operations. If we do complete acquisitions, they may be viewed negatively by customers or investors and they may not enable us to strengthen our competitive position or achieve our goals. In addition, any acquisitions that we make could lead to difficulties in integrating personnel, technologies and operations from the acquired businesses and in retaining and motivating key personnel from these businesses. Moreover, acquisitions may disrupt our ongoing operations, divert management from day-to-day responsibilities and increase our expenses. Future acquisitions may reduce our cash available for operations and other uses, and could result in increases in amortization expenses related to identifiable intangible assets acquired, potentially dilutive issuances of equity securities or the incurrence of debt. We cannot predict the number, timing or size of future acquisitions, or the effect that any such acquisitions might have on our operating results.

Changes in international trade policies and international barriers to trade may have an adverse effect on our business and expansion plans.

We currently export our products to a number of countries outside of the PRC and derive sales from sales of our products to customers in those countries. We intend to further increase the sales of our current and future products to countries outside of the PRC. In addition, we rely on certain overseas suppliers, including suppliers in the United States, for the supply of certain equipment and tools, such as our electronic design automation, a development tool. Changes to trade policies, treaties and tariffs in or affecting the jurisdictions in which we operate and to which we sell our products, or the perception that these changes could occur, could adversely affect the financial and economic conditions in those jurisdictions, as well as our international sales, financial condition and results of operations.

In recent years, the U.S. government has advocated greater restrictions on trade generally and significant increases on tariffs on goods imported into the United States, particularly from China, and has recently taken steps toward restricting trade in certain goods. On June 15, 2018, the U.S. Trade Representative announced the imposition of an additional duty of 25% on approximately US$50 billion worth of Chinese imports, including those related to China’s “Made in China 2025” industrial policy. This list of products consists of two sets of U.S. tariff lines. The additional duty assessed on the first set, which includes photosensitive semiconductor devices, parts and accessories for measuring semiconductor devices, came into effect on July 6, 2018. These tariffs impact Chinese semiconductor companies that manufacture and export to the United States. The second set, which includes electronic integrated circuits, came into effect on August 23, 2018. On September 21, 2018, the U.S. Trade Representative further announced the imposition of additional duties on approximately US$200 billion worth of Chinese imports. The additional duties came into effect on September 24, 2018. Additionally, we plan to sell our AI products to domestic manufacturers who will then incorporate our AI products into final products such as smart appliances. Therefore, while our AI products are not currently subject to these tariffs directly, the products of our customers that incorporate our AI products may be subject to these tariffs. We cannot assure you that future restrictions on trade and tariffs implemented by the United States will not affect our products, which would negatively affect our expansion plans as well as our financial condition and results of operations.

23

Table of Contents

We could be adversely affected by political tensions between the United States and China.

Political tensions between the United States and China have escalated in recent years due to, among other things, the trade war between the two countries since 2018, the COVID-19 outbreak, the PRC National People’s Congress’ passage of Law of the People’s Republic of China on Safeguarding National Security in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, the imposition of U.S. sanctions on certain Chinese officials from China’s central government and the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region by the U.S. government, and the imposition of sanctions on certain individuals from the U.S. by the Chinese government, various executive orders issued by former U.S. President Donald J. Trump, such as the executive order issued in November 2020 that prohibits U.S. persons from transacting publicly traded securities of certain “Communist Chinese military companies” named in such executive order, as well as the executive order issued in January 2021 that prohibits such transactions as are identified by the U.S. Secretary of Commerce with certain “Chinese connected software applications” as well as the Rules on Counteracting Unjustified Extra-territorial Application of Foreign Legislation and Other Measures promulgated by China’s Ministry of Commerce on January 9, 2021, which will apply to Chinese individuals or entities that are purportedly barred by a foreign country’s law from dealing with nationals or entities of a third country. Rising political tensions between China and the U.S. could reduce levels of trades, investments, technological exchanges and other economic activities between the two major economies, which would have a material adverse effect on global economic conditions and the stability of global financial markets. The measures taken by the U.S. and Chinese governments may have the effect of restricting our ability to transact or otherwise do business with entities within or outside of China and may cause investors to lose confidence in Chinese companies and counterparties, including us. If we were unable to conduct our business as it is currently conducted as a result of such regulatory changes, our business, results of operations and financial condition would be materially and adversely affected.

Furthermore, there have been recent media reports on deliberations within the U.S. government regarding potentially limiting or restricting China-based companies from accessing U.S. capital markets, and delisting China-based companies from U.S. national securities exchanges. In January 2021, after reversing its own delisting decision, the NYSE ultimately resolved to delist certain Chinese state-owned enterprises in the telecom industry in compliance with the executive order issued in November 2020, after receiving additional guidance from the U.S. Department of Treasury and its Office of Foreign Assets Control. These delistings have introduced greater confusion and uncertainty about the status and prospects of Chinese companies listed on the U.S. stock exchanges. If any further such deliberations were to materialize, the resulting legislation may have a material adverse impact on the stock performance of China-based issuers listed in the United States such as us, and we cannot assure you that we will always be able to maintain the listing of our ADSs on a national stock exchange in the U.S., such as the NYSE or the Nasdaq Stock Market, or that you will always be allowed to trade our shares or ADSs.

We face risks related to natural disasters, health epidemics, such as COVID-19, and other catastrophes, which could significantly disrupt our operations.

Our business could be materially and adversely affected by natural disasters or other catastrophes, such as earthquakes, fire, floods, hail, windstorms, severe weather conditions, environmental accidents, power loss, communications failures, explosions, terrorist attacks and similar events. Our business could also be materially and adversely affected by public health emergencies, such as the outbreak of avian influenza, severe acute respiratory syndrome, or SARS, Zika virus, Ebola virus, the 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19) or other local health epidemics in China and elsewhere and global pandemics. If any of our employees is suspected of having contracted any contagious disease, we may, under certain circumstances, be required to quarantine those employees and the affected areas of our operations. As a result, we may have to temporarily suspend part or all of our facilities. Furthermore, authorities may impose restrictions on travel and transportation and implement other preventative measures in affected regions to deal with the catastrophe or emergency, which may lead to the temporary closure of our facilities and declining economic activity at large.

In the recent period of time, as the Delta and Omicron variants of COVID-19 periodically spread in China, temporary lockdowns and suspension of business had been enforced in the regions affected. Due to the outbreak of Omicron variant in 2022, certain cities in China have imposed new restrictions and quarantine requirements with office closures and stay home orders. Besides, in March 2022, the COVID-19 resurgence, together with the resulting travel restrictions and quarantine measures, caused disruptions in the operations of our assembly plant in the PRC, which resulted in delays in the shipment of products to certain of our customers. At the end of November 2022, Chinese government eased strict zero COVID-19 policy which caused surge of COVID-19 cases in December 2022 and January 2023. A prolonged outbreak of any health epidemic or other adverse public health developments could have a material adverse effect on our business operations.

24

Table of Contents

The COVID-19 pandemic has continued to adversely affect many aspects of our business, including our operations, customers, suppliers and projects. The extent to which the COVID-19 has and may persist to impact our ability to effectively operate continues to be highly uncertain. While we do not expect that the COVID-19 virus will continue to have a material adverse effect on our business or financial results at this time, it is not possible to predict the unanticipated consequences of the recurrence of COVID-19 variants on our future business performance and liquidity given the severe impact brought by the outbreak of COVID-19 since late 2019. We will continue to monitor and adhere to the policies, lockdowns, restrictions, and preventive measures implemented by the various government authorities, as well as general movement restrictions, social distancing and other measures imposed to slow the spread of COVID-19.

Cyber-security incidents, including data security breaches or computer viruses, could harm our business by disrupting our delivery of services, damaging our reputation or exposing us to liability.

We receive, process, store and transmit, often electronically, the data of our customers and others, much of which is confidential. Unauthorized access to our computer systems or stored data could result in the theft, including cyber-theft, or improper disclosure of confidential information, and the deletion or modification of records could cause interruptions in our operations. These cyber-security risks increase when we transmit information from one location to another, including over the Internet or other electronic networks. Despite the security measures we have implemented, our facilities, systems and procedures, and those of our third-party service providers, may be vulnerable to security breaches, acts of vandalism, software viruses, misplaced or lost data, programming or human errors or other similar events which may disrupt our delivery of services or expose the confidential information of our customers and others. Any security breach involving the misappropriation, loss or other unauthorized disclosure or use of confidential information of our customers or others, whether by us or a third party, could (i) subject us to civil and criminal penalties, (ii) have a negative impact on our reputation, or (iii) expose us to liability to our customers, third parties or government authorities. We are not aware of such breaches to date. Any of these developments could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our business is subject to various evolving PRC laws and regulations regarding data privacy and cyber-security. Failure of cyber-security and data privacy concerns could subject us to penalties, damage our reputation and brand, and harm our business and results of operations.

We face significant challenges with respect to cyber-security and data privacy, including the receipt, processing, storage, and transmission of the data of our customers and others, much of which is confidential. While our principal business activities do not involve large amount of registered users and deal with vast amount of user data, we operate a small-scale online discussion forum for developers and therefore transmit and store limited amount of confidential and private information of our customers and others, such as personal information, including user accounts, phone numbers and E-mail accounts. As of December 31, 2022, our online discussion forum had far less than one million of registered users.

As such, we are subject to various regulatory requirements relating to cyber-security and data privacy, including, without limitation the PRC Cybersecurity Law. We are required by these laws and regulations to ensure the confidentiality, integrity, availability, and authenticity of the information of our customers and others, which is also essential to maintaining their confidence in our products. We have adopted strict information security policies and deployed advanced measures to implement the policies, including, among others, advanced encryption technologies. However, advances in technology, an increased level of sophistication and diversity of our products and services, an increased level of expertise of hackers, new discoveries in the field of cryptography or others can still result in a compromise or breach of our websites. If we are unable to protect our systems, and hence the information stored in our systems, from unauthorized access, use, disclosure, disruption, modification, or destruction, such problems or security breaches could cause a loss, give rise to our liabilities to the owners of confidential information, or subject us to fines and other penalties. In addition, complying with various laws and regulations could cause us to incur substantial costs or require us to change our business practices, including our data practices, in a manner adverse to our business.

25

Table of Contents

In addition, regulatory requirements on cyber-security and data privacy are constantly evolving and can be subject to varying interpretations or significant changes, resulting in uncertainties about the scope of our responsibilities in that regard. For example, on June 10, 2021, the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress promulgated the PRC Data Security Law (《中华人民共和国数据安全法》), which took effect in September 2021. The PRC Data Security Law provides for a security review procedure for the data activities that may affect national security. Additionally, the Revised Review Measures, which became effective on February 15, 2022, set forth the cybersecurity review mechanism for critical information infrastructure operators and network platform operators, and provided that critical information infrastructure operators who procure internet products and services and network platform operators engaging in data processing activities that affect or may affect national security shall be subject to a cybersecurity review. The Revised Review Measures further stipulate that if a network platform operator has personal information of over one million users and intends to be listed in a foreign country, it must be subject to the cybersecurity review. The exact scope of “critical information infrastructure operators” and “network platform operators” under the Revised Review Measures and the current regulatory regime remains unclear, and the PRC government authorities may have wide discretion in the interpretation and enforcement of these laws. Therefore, it is uncertain whether we would be deemed as a critical information infrastructure operator or a network platform operator under PRC law. As advised by Commerce & Finance Law Offices, our PRC legal advisor, the Revised Review Measures remain unclear on whether the relevant requirements will be applicable to companies that have been listed in the United States, such as us. It also remains uncertain whether the future regulatory changes would impose additional restrictions on companies like us. We cannot predict the impact of the Revised Review Measures, if any, at this stage, and we will closely monitor and assess any development in the rule-making process. If we are required to complete such review or approval by any further laws and regulations or authorities, we face uncertainties as to whether such clearance can be timely obtained, or at all. If we are not able to comply with the cybersecurity and data privacy requirements in a timely manner, or at all, we may be subject to government enforcement actions and investigations, fines, penalties, suspension of our non-compliant operations, among other sanctions, which could materially and adversely affect our business and results of operations.

Preferential tax treatment currently available to us in the PRC could be discontinued or reduced.

The amended Enterprise Income Tax Law and its implementation rules permit certain “high and new technology enterprises strongly supported by the state,” or HNTEs, which hold independent ownership of core intellectual property to enjoy a preferential enterprise income tax rate, or EIT rate, of 15% subject to certain qualification criteria. HNTEs status is subject to review and renewal every three years. Currently, we have two PRC subsidiaries that are recognized as HNTE and are thus eligible for the favorable 15% enterprise income tax rate from 2022 to 2024. However, if any of these subsidiaries fails to pass the review by, and filing with, the relevant tax authorities to be qualified as a HNTE, such company will no longer enjoy the corresponding preferential tax treatment described above.

We require various approvals, licenses, permits and certifications to operate our business. Any failure to obtain or renew any of these approvals, licenses, permits or certifications could materially and adversely affect our business and results of operations.

In accordance with the laws and regulations in the jurisdictions in which we operate, we are required to maintain various approvals, licenses, permits and certifications in order to operate our business. Complying with such laws and regulations may require substantial expense, and any non-compliance may expose us to liability. In the event of non-compliance, we may have to incur significant expenses and divert substantial management time to rectify the incidents. In the future, if we fail to obtain all the necessary approvals, licenses, permits and certifications, we may be subject to fines or the suspension of operations at the production facilities and research and development facilities that do not have all the requisite approvals, licenses, permits and certifications, which could materially and adversely affect our business and results of operations. We may also experience adverse publicity arising from non-compliance with government regulations, which would negatively impact our reputation.

We cannot assure you that we will be able to fulfill all the conditions necessary to obtain the required government approvals, or that relevant government officials will always, if ever, exercise their discretion in our favor, or that we will be able to adapt to any new laws, regulations and policies. There may also be delays on the part of government authorities in reviewing our applications and granting approvals, whether due to the lack of human resources or the imposition of new rules, regulations, government policies or their implementation, interpretation and enforcement. If we are unable to obtain, or experience material delays in obtaining, necessary government approvals, our operations may be substantially disrupted, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

26

Table of Contents

We may be involved in legal and other disputes from time to time, whether arising out of our operations, including disputes with our raw material or component suppliers, production partners, customers or employees, or class action lawsuits from our shareholders.

We may from time to time be involved in disputes with various parties arising out of our operations, including raw material or electronic components suppliers, production partners, customers or employees. These disputes may lead to protests or legal or other proceedings and may result in damage to our reputation, substantial costs and diversion of resources and management’s attention from our core business activities. In addition, we may encounter compliance issues with regulatory bodies in the course of our operations, in respect of which we may face administrative proceedings or unfavorable decisions that may result in liabilities and cause delays to our production and delivery. We may be involved in other proceedings or disputes in the future that may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

In the past, shareholders of public companies have often brought securities class action suits against those companies following periods of instability in the market price of their securities, or after the publication of third-party research reports. For example, a negative research report was published about us by Marcus Aurelius Value on February 20, 2020. Subsequently, on March 4, 2020, a putative class action was filed in the United States District Court of Oregon (the “Federal Action”) against us and certain of our officers and directors, among others. The complaint alleges that our registration statement on Form F-1, initially filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 28, 2019 (File No. 333-234356), contained material misstatements and omissions in violation of federal securities laws. On March 6, 2020, another putative class action, making substantially similar allegations, was filed in New York County Supreme Court (the “State Action”) against us and certain of our officers and directors. On June 1, 2020, we filed a motion to stay all proceedings in the State Action pending adjudication of the Federal Action, which was granted on July 21, 2020. Subsequently, the Federal Action was transferred to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (the “Court”) on September 2, 2020. On October 7, 2020, lead plaintiffs in the Federal Action filed an amended complaint asserting claims under Section 11 of the Securities Act and Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act for that the registration statement failed to disclose three alleged related party transactions. On December 7, 2020, we filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint in the Federal Action. On July 8, 2021, the Court dismissed the first amended complaint but allowed plaintiffs to file a second amended complaint by August 6, 2021. On August 6, 2021, plaintiffs filed a letter motion for leave to file a second amended complaint. On August 27, 2021, we filed a letter response to oppose plaintiffs’ August 6, 2021 letter motion and to seek a final judgment dismissing the Federal Action to be entered. On March 31, 2022, the Court denied plaintiffs’ motion for leave to file a second amended complaint as futile and dismissed Plaintiffs’ claims with prejudice. Plaintiffs did not appeal. Following dismissal with prejudice of the of the Federal Action, plaintiff voluntarily discontinued the State Action with prejudice on June 2, 2022.

On April 15, 2021, a new putative class action was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York against us and certain of our officers and directors. The complaint alleges that our statements in February 2021 about increased visibility into revenue and the size and quality of orders we were receiving were materially false and misleading. Plaintiff claims that the truth about our revenue was revealed in April 2021, when we announced our latest financial results. On December 9, 2021, the Court appointed Bill Lu and Liying Huang as lead plaintiffs and Brager Eagle & Squire, P.C. as lead plaintiffs’ counsel. On February 7, 2022, lead plaintiffs filed an amended complaint asserting the same claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act against the same set of defendants. The amended complaint alleges our November 30, 2020 and February 10, 2021 press releases and the April 9, 2021 interview of our chief executive officer in an article published by Decrypt contained were false and misleading statements regarding the pre-sale orders we had received and our ability to secure sufficient chip supply to meet the increasing demand for mining machines, because those statements allegedly left “investors with the false impression that revenue in the fourth quarter 2020 would be solid” and allegedly omitted that the pre-sale orders were locked in at lower prices than the re-bounding Bitcoin market prices during the third quarter of 2019 and fourth quarter of 2020, and we had been experiencing significant supply chain disruptions during the fourth quarter of 2020. On April 8, 2022, we filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint, which has been fully briefed as of July 7, 2022. As of the date of this annual report, the Court issued an order granting our motion to dismiss the case in its entirety. The Court granted lead plaintiffs leave to further amend their amended complaint, the deadline of which is April 26, 2023.

The class action suits that we are aware of and if we were involved in a class action suit in the future, it could divert a significant amount of our management’s attention and other resources from our business and operations and require us to incur significant expenses to defend the suit, which could harm our results of operations. Any such class action suit, whether or not successful, could harm our reputation and restrict our ability to raise capital in the future. In addition, if a claim is successfully made against us, we may be required to pay significant damages, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

27

Table of Contents

A significant portion of our income is contributed by a limited number of clients. If we cannot retain these clients for any reason or expand our client base, our income may decrease and the financial condition and results of operations of us may be materially and adversely affected.

For the year ended December 31, 2022, our top three customers account for 33%, 22% and 16% of total revenue from us, respectively. Although we plan to continue to expand our client base, launch more products and solutions, and generate income from a wider range of clients, we cannot guarantee you that we will be able to succeed or that such client concentration will decrease. If we fail to retain our top clients, our overall income may decrease and the financial condition and results of operations of us may be materially and adversely affected.

Our insurance coverage is limited and may not be adequate to cover potential losses and liabilities. A significant uninsured loss or a loss in excess of our insurance coverage could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

The insurance products available to us are limited, and the insurance policies we have obtained may not cover all risks associated with our business. The occurrence of certain incidents including severe weather, earthquake, fire, war, power outages, flooding and the consequences resulting from them may not be covered by our insurance policies adequately, or at all. If we were subject to substantial liabilities that were not covered by our insurance, we could incur costs and losses that could materially and adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

In addition, we may not be able to recover losses relating to our business pursuant to the commercial agreements we enter with our suppliers, partners or third parties. Under these agreements, some suppliers, partners and parties are not liable for any special, incidental, indirect, intangible, or consequential damages arising out of, or in connection with, among other things, the terms of the agreements or performance thereunder. Further, it may be the case that in no event will the aggregate liability pursuant to these agreements hold a party liable for any loss or damage exceeding the fees paid or payable to the party by the Company during a period immediately preceding the incident giving rise to such liability. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the liability of a party may not be limited in respect of direct damages arising from, or in any way related to, the fraud, willful misconduct or gross negligence of the party in question.

We may need additional capital but may not be able to obtain it in a timely manner and on favorable terms or at all.

Our operations may require additional capital or financing from time to time in order to achieve further growth. We had no outstanding borrowings as of December 31, 2022. We may require additional cash resources due to the future growth and development of our business. Our future capital requirements may be substantial as we seek to expand our operations, diversify our product offering, and pursue acquisitions and equity investments. If our cash resources are insufficient to satisfy our cash requirements, we may seek to issue additional equity or debt securities or obtain new or expanded credit facilities or enter into additional factoring arrangements.

Our ability to obtain external financing in the future is subject to a variety of uncertainties, including our future financial condition, results of operations and cash flows and the liquidity of international capital and lending markets. In addition, our loan agreements may contain financial covenants that restrict our ability to incur additional indebtedness or to distribute dividends. Any indebtedness that we may incur in the future may also contain operating and financial covenants that could further restrict our operations. There can be no assurance that financing will be available in a timely manner or in amounts or on terms acceptable to us, or at all. A large amount of bank borrowings and other debt may result in a significant increase in interest expense while at the same time exposing us to increased interest rate risks. Equity financings could result in dilution to our shareholders, and the securities issued in future financings may have rights, preferences and privileges that are senior to those of our ordinary shares or ADSs. Any failure to raise needed funds on terms favorable to us, or at all, could severely restrict our liquidity as well as have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

28

Table of Contents

Adverse developments affecting the financial services industry could adversely affect our current and projected business operations and our financial condition and results of operations.

Adverse developments that affect financial institutions, such as events involving liquidity that are rumored or actual, have in the past and may in the future lead to bank failures and market-wide liquidity problems. For example, on March 10, 2023, Silicon Valley Bank (“SVB”) was closed by the California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation, which appointed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) as receiver. Similarly, on March 12, 2023, Signature Bank and Silvergate Capital Corp. were each swept into receivership. The Department of the Treasury, the Federal Reserve and the FDIC released a statement that indicated that all depositors of SVB and Signature Bank would have access to all of their funds, including funds held in uninsured deposit accounts, after only one business day of closure.

We do not hold cash deposits at SVB and have withdrawn all our deposits from Signature Bank. Also, we do not hold securities at SVB or Signature Bank and have not experienced any adverse impact to our liquidity or to our current and projected business operations, financial condition or results of operations. However, uncertainty remains over liquidity concerns in the broader financial services industry, and our business, our business partners, or industry as a whole may be adversely impacted in ways that we cannot predict at this time.

Although we assess our banking relationships as we believe necessary or appropriate, our access to cash in amounts adequate to finance or capitalize our current and projected future business operations could be significantly impaired by factors that affect the financial institutions with which we have banking relationships, and in turn, us. These factors could include, among others, events such as liquidity constraints or failures, the ability to perform obligations under various types of financial, credit or liquidity agreements or arrangements, disruptions or instability in the financial services industry or financial markets, or concerns or negative expectations about the prospects for companies in the financial services industry. These factors could also include factors involving financial markets or the financial services industry generally. The results of events or concerns that involve one or more of these factors could include a variety of material and adverse impacts on our current and projected business operations and our financial condition and results of operations. These could include, but may not be limited to, delayed access to deposits or other financial assets or the uninsured loss of deposits or other financial assets; or termination of cash management arrangements and/or delays in accessing or actual loss of funds subject to cash management arrangements.

In addition, widespread investor concerns regarding the U.S. or international financial systems could result in less favorable commercial financing terms, including higher interest rates or costs and tighter financial and operating covenants, or systemic limitations on access to credit and liquidity sources, thereby making it more difficult for us to acquire financing on acceptable terms or at all. Any decline in available funding or access to our cash and liquidity resources could, among other risks, adversely impact our ability to meet our operating expenses, financial obligations or fulfill our other obligations, result in breaches of our financial and/or contractual obligations or result in violations of federal or state wage and hour laws. Any of these impacts, or any other impacts resulting from the factors described above or other related or similar factors not described above, could have material adverse impacts on our liquidity and our current and/or projected business operations and financial condition and results of operations.

In addition, our business partners could be adversely affected by any of the liquidity or other risks that are described above as factors, which in turn, could have a material adverse effect on our current and/or projected business operations and results of operations and financial condition. Any business partner bankruptcy or insolvency, or any breach or default by a business partner, or the loss of any significant business partner relationships, could result in material adverse impacts on our current and/or projected business operations and financial condition.

We rely on third-party logistics service providers to deliver our products. Disruption in logistics may prevent us from meeting customer demand and our business, financial condition and results of operations may suffer as a result.

We engage independent third-party logistics service providers to deliver the ICs from our production partners to our assembly plant and our products from our warehouses to our customers. Disputes with or termination of our contractual relationships with one or more of our logistics service providers could result in delayed delivery of products or increased costs. There can be no assurance that we can continue or extend relationships with our current logistics service providers on terms acceptable to us, or that we will be able to establish relationships with new logistics service providers to ensure accurate, timely and cost-efficient delivery services. If we are unable to maintain or develop good relationships with our preferred logistics service providers, it may inhibit our ability to offer products in sufficient quantities, on a timely basis, or at prices acceptable to our consumers. If there is any breakdown in our relationships with our preferred logistics service providers, we cannot assure you that no interruptions in our product delivery would occur or that they would not materially and adversely affect our business, prospects and results of operations.

29

Table of Contents

As we do not have any direct control over these logistics service providers, we cannot guarantee their quality of service. In addition, services provided by these logistics service providers could be interrupted by unforeseen events beyond our control, such as poor handling provided by these logistics service providers, natural disasters, pandemics, adverse weather conditions, riots and labor strikes. If there is any delay in delivery, damage to products or any other issue, we may lose customers and sales and our brand image may be tarnished.

Bitcoin mining activities are energy-intensive, which may restrict the geographic locations of miners and have a negative environmental impact.

Bitcoin mining activities are inherently energy-intensive and electricity costs account for a significant portion of the overall mining costs. The availability and cost of electricity will restrict the geographic locations of mining activities.

Any shortage of electricity supply or increase in electricity cost in a jurisdiction may negatively impact the viability and the expected economic return for Bitcoin mining activities in that jurisdiction, which may in turn decrease the sales of our Bitcoin mining machines in that jurisdiction.

In addition, the significant consumption of electricity may have a negative environmental impact, including contribution to climate change, which may give rise to public opinion against allowing the use of electricity for Bitcoin mining activities or government measures restricting or prohibiting the use of electricity for Bitcoin mining activities. Any such development in the jurisdictions where we sell our Bitcoin mining machines could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our business operation and international expansion is subject to geopolitical risks.

Our business operation and international expansion is subject to geopolitical risks. We rely on our production partners in and outside of PRC for the fabrication, testing and packaging for our ASICs. Any significant deterioration in the cross-strait relationship may have a negative impact on the ability of our production partners outside of PRC to fulfill their contractual obligations and ship the ASICs to us, which could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

In addition, there might be significant changes to United States trade policies, treaties and tariffs, including trade policies and tariffs regarding the PRC. China may respond by imposing retaliatory trade measures against the United States. We rely on suppliers in the United States for the supply of certain equipment and tools. If the United States restricts or prohibits the importation of ASICs or related products from China, our international expansion may be negatively affected. If China imposes retaliatory trade measures that affect the importation of the equipment and tools we require, we may face difficulty in our production. In all cases, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

We may be subject to fines and other administrative penalties resulting from the operation of our business, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operation.

We are subject to regulation by the PRC government authorities. These relevant regulatory authorities have broad powers to adopt regulations and other requirements affecting or restricting our operations, including tax policies. Moreover, these relevant regulatory authorities possess significant powers to enforce applicable regulatory requirements in the event of our non-compliance, including the imposition of fines, sanctions or the revocation of licenses or permits to operate our business. Any of these events could have a material adverse impact on our results of operation.

30

Table of Contents

Any global systemic economic and financial crisis could negatively affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition.

Any prolonged slowdown in the Chinese or global economy may have a negative impact on our business, results of operations and financial condition. The global financial markets have experienced significant disruptions since 2008 and the United States, Europe and other economies have experienced periods of recession. The recovery from the lows of 2008 and 2009 has been uneven and there are new challenges, including the escalation of the European sovereign debt crisis from 2011 and the slowdown of the PRC’s economic growth since 2012, which may continue. There is also the prospect of a brewing global recession as the result of the COVID-19 pandemic. There is considerable uncertainty over the long-term effects of the expansionary monetary and fiscal policies adopted by the central banks and financial authorities of some of the world’s leading economies, including the United States and the PRC. There have also been concerns over unrest in Ukraine, the Middle East and Africa, which have resulted in volatility in financial and other markets. There have also been concerns over the United Kingdom leaving the European Union as well as the significant potential changes to United States trade policies, treaties and tariffs, including trade policies and tariffs regarding the PRC. There have also been concerns about the economic effect of the tensions in the relationship between the PRC and surrounding Asian countries. There were and could be in the future a number of domino effects from such turmoil on our business, including significant decreases in orders from our customers; insolvency of key suppliers resulting in product delays; inability of customers to obtain credit to finance purchases of our products and/or customer insolvencies; and counterparty failures negatively impacting our operations. Any systemic economic or financial crisis could cause revenues for the semiconductor industry as a whole to decline dramatically and could materially and adversely affect our results of operations.

If counterfeit products are sold under our brand names and trademarks, our reputation and financial results could be materially and adversely affected.

Third-party merchants and dealers are separately responsible for sourcing counterfeit products that are sold under our brand names and trademarks. Counterfeit products may be defective or inferior in quality as compared to authentic products. If our customers are not satisfied by counterfeit products sold under our brand names and trademarks, we may be subject to reputational damage. We believe our brand and reputation are important to our success and our competitive position. The discovery of counterfeit products sold under our brand names and trademarks may severally damage our reputation and cause customers to refrain from making future purchases from us, which would materially and adversely affect our business operations and financial results.

Risks Relating to Doing Business in the PRC

Economic, political and social conditions as well as governmental policies in the PRC could adversely affect our business, prospects, financial condition and financial results.

Substantially all of our assets and operations are located in China. Accordingly, our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects may be influenced by economic, political and social conditions in China generally. The PRC economy differs from the economies of most developed countries in many aspects, including:

The PRC economy has been transitioning from a centrally planned economy to a more market-oriented economy for approximately four decades as the PRC government has implemented economic reform measures to utilize market forces in the development of the PRC economy. We cannot predict whether changes in the economic, political and social conditions of the PRC and in its laws, regulations and policies will have any adverse effect on our current or future business, financial condition or results of operations.

31

Table of Contents

More specifically, many of the economic reforms carried out by the PRC government are unprecedented or experimental and are expected to be refined and improved over time. This refining and adjustment process may not necessarily have a positive effect on our operations and business development. These actions, as well as other actions and policies of the government of the PRC, could cause a decrease in the overall level of economic activity in the PRC and the surrounding regions and, in turn, have an adverse impact on our business and financial condition.

Changes to and uncertainties in the legal system of the PRC may have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Legal protections available to you under the legal system of the PRC may be limited.

The PRC is still in the process of developing a comprehensive statutory framework. Since 1979, the PRC government has established a commercial law system, and significant progress has been made in promulgating laws and regulations relating to economic affairs and matters such as corporate organization and governance, foreign investment, commerce, taxation and trade. However, many of these laws and regulations are relatively new, and the implementation and interpretation of these laws and regulations remain uncertain in many areas. It may be difficult to obtain swift and equitable enforcement or to obtain enforcement of a judgment by a court of another jurisdiction. Consequently, developments and changes in the PRC laws and regulations, including their interpretation and enforcement, may have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Furthermore, the legal protections available to you under the PRC legal system may be limited.

Risks and uncertainties arising from the legal system of mainland China could result in a material adverse change in our operations and the value of our ADSs. Also, PRC governmental authorities’ oversight and control over offerings conducted overseas by, and foreign investment in, China-based issuers could limit or hinder our ability to offer or continue to offer securities to investors and result in a material adverse change in our operations and the value of our ADSs.

We conduct our business primarily through our PRC operating subsidiaries. Our operations in China are governed by PRC laws and regulations. The legal system of mainland China is based on written statutes, and court decisions may be cited for reference, but have limited precedential value. We face uncertainties in terms of enforcement of PRC laws, regulations and rules, which may increase our difficulties in strict compliance with all regulatory requirements and limit legal protections available to us and our investors, including you.

From time to time, we may have to resort to administrative and court proceedings to enforce the legal protection that we enjoy either by law or contract. However, any such litigation may take a long time, resulting in substantial costs and diversion of our resources and management attention, and we cannot predict the outcome of administrative and court proceedings.

The PRC governmental authorities have oversight and discretion over the conduct of our business, and it may stricter requirements and urge us to adjust accordingly, which could result in a material adverse change in our operation and/or the value of our ADSs.

In addition, the PRC government has recently announced its plans to enhance its regulatory oversight of Chinese companies listing overseas. The Opinions on Intensifying Crack Down on Illegal Securities Activities (《关于依法从严打击证券违法活动的意见》) issued on July 6, 2021 called for:

32

Table of Contents

The CSRC, promulgated the Overseas Listing Trial Measures and five relevant guidelines on February 17, 2023, which became effective on March 31, 2023. The Overseas Listing Trial Measures regulate both direct and indirect overseas offering and listing by PRC domestic companies by adopting a filing-based regulatory regime. The Overseas Listing Trial Measures provide that if the issuer both meets the following criteria, the overseas securities offering and listing conducted by such issuer will be deemed as indirect overseas offering subject to the filing procedure set forth under the Overseas Listing Trial Measures: (i) 50% or more of the issuer’s operating revenue, total profit, total assets or net assets as documented in its audited consolidated financial statements for the most recent fiscal year is accounted for by the issuer’s domestic companies; and (ii) the issuer’s business activities are substantially conducted in mainland China, or its principal place of business are located in mainland China, or the senior managers in charge of its business operations and management are mostly Chinese citizens or domiciled in mainland China. The determination as to whether or not an overseas offering and listing by domestic companies is indirect, shall be made on a substance over form basis.

On the same day, the CSRC also held a press conference for the release of the Trial Measures and issued the Notice on Administration for the Filing of Overseas Offering and Listing by Domestic Companies, which, among others, clarifies that on or prior to the effective date of the Overseas Listing Trial Measures, domestic companies that have been completed their overseas offering and listing, which are called as “the stock enterprises (存量企业)”. As a stock enterprise (存量企业), we shall file with the CSRC within 3 working days after the subsequent securities offering is completed. The CSRC shall order rectification, issue warnings and impose fines to the company fails to fulfill filing procedure as stipulated in Overseas Listing Trial Measures.

In addition, the CSRC published the Provisions on Strengthening Confidentiality and Archives Administration in Respect of Overseas Issuance and Listing of Securities by Domestic Enterprises (《关于加强境内企业境外发行证券和上市相关保密和档案管理工作的规定》) on February 24, 2023, which became effective on March 31, 2023. The CSRC stipulates domestic enterprises, securities companies and securities service agencies which provide the corresponding services in the course of overseas issuance and listing of domestic enterprises, shall strengthen legal awareness of confidentiality of State secrets and archives administration, establish a sound system for confidentiality and archives work, adopt the requisite measures to perform the responsibilities of confidentiality and archives administration.

As there are still uncertainties regarding the interpretation and implementation of such regulatory guidance, we cannot assure you that we will always be able to comply with new regulatory requirements relating to our future overseas capital-raising activities. We may become subject to more stringent requirements with respect to matters including cross-border investigation and enforcement of legal claims.

The Chinese government may promulgate relevant laws, rules and regulations that may impose additional and significant obligations and liabilities on overseas listed Chinese companies regarding data security, cross-border data flow, and compliance with China’s securities laws. See also “—Risks Relating to Our Business and Industry—Our business is subject to various evolving PRC laws and regulations regarding data privacy and cyber-security. Failure of cyber-security and data privacy concerns could subject us to penalties, damage our reputation and brand, and harm our business and results of operations.” It is uncertain whether or how these new laws, rules and regulations and the interpretation and implementation thereof may affect us, but among other things, our ability and the ability of our PRC subsidiaries to obtain external financing through the issuance of equity securities overseas could be negatively affected.

33

Table of Contents

You may experience difficulties enforcing judgments against us and our management in the PRC.

We were advised by Commerce & Finance Law Offices, our PRC legal adviser, that the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments are governed by the PRC Civil Procedures Law. PRC courts may recognize and enforce foreign judgments in accordance with the requirements of the PRC Civil Procedures Law based either on treaties between the PRC and the country where the judgment is made or on reciprocity between jurisdictions, provided that the foreign judgments do not violate the basic principles of laws of the PRC or its sovereignty, security or social and public interest.

PRC regulations relating to the establishment of offshore special purpose vehicles by PRC residents may subject our PRC-resident beneficial owners or our PRC subsidiaries to liability or penalties, limit our ability to make capital contributions into our PRC subsidiaries, limit our PRC subsidiaries’ ability to distribute profits to us, or otherwise adversely affect our financial position.

Under several regulations promulgated by the State Administration of Foreign Exchange of the People’s Republic of China, or SAFE, PRC residents and PRC corporate entities are required to register with and obtain approval from local branches of SAFE or designated qualified foreign exchange banks in China in connection with their direct or indirect offshore investment activities. In addition, any PRC resident who is a direct or indirect shareholder of an offshore company is required to update the previously filed registration with the local branch of SAFE, with respect to any material change involving that offshore company, such as an increase or decrease in capital, transfer or swap of shares, merger or division. These regulations apply to all direct and indirect shareholders and beneficial owners of our company who are PRC residents, or PRC-Resident Shareholders, and may apply to any offshore acquisitions that we make in the future. To the best of our knowledge, as of the date of this annual report, each of our principal shareholders who is required to make the foreign exchange registration under SAFE Circular 37 had completed such registration. However, we may not at all times be fully aware or informed of the identities of all the PRC residents holding direct or indirect interests in our company, and we cannot assure you that all of our shareholders and beneficial owners who are PRC residents will comply with these foreign exchange regulations.

If any PRC-Resident Shareholder fails to make the required registration or update a previously filed registration, our PRC subsidiaries may be prohibited from distributing their profits and proceeds from any reduction in capital, share transfer or liquidation to us, and we may also be prohibited from injecting additional capital into our PRC subsidiaries. Moreover, failure to comply with the various foreign exchange registration requirements described above could result in liability on the related PRC-Resident shareholder or our PRC subsidiaries under the PRC laws for evasion of applicable foreign exchange restrictions.

The PCAOB had historically been unable to inspect our auditors in relation to their audit work performed for our financial statements and the inability of the PCAOB to conduct inspections of our auditors in the past has deprived our investors with the benefits of such inspections.

Our auditors, the independent registered public accounting firms that issue the audit report included in this annual report, as auditors of companies that are traded publicly in the United States and a firm registered with the PCAOB, are subject to laws in the United States pursuant to which the PCAOB conducts regular inspections to assess its compliance with the applicable professional standards. The auditors are located in mainland China, a jurisdiction where the PCAOB was historically unable to conduct inspections and investigations completely before 2022. As a result, we and investors in the ADSs were deprived of the benefits of such PCAOB inspections. The inability of the PCAOB to conduct inspections of auditors in China in the past has made it more difficult to evaluate the effectiveness of our independent registered public accounting firms’ audit procedures or quality control procedures as compared to auditors outside of China that are subject to the PCAOB inspections. On December 15, 2022, the PCAOB issued a report that vacated its December 16, 2021 determination and removed mainland China and Hong Kong from the list of jurisdictions where it is unable to inspect or investigate completely registered public accounting firms. However, if the PCAOB determines in the future that it no longer has full access to inspect and investigate completely accounting firms in mainland China and Hong Kong, and we use an accounting firm headquartered in one of these jurisdictions to issue an audit report on our financial statements filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, we and investors in our ADSs would be deprived of the benefits of such PCAOB inspections again, which could cause investors and potential investors in the ADSs to lose confidence in our audit procedures and reported financial information and the quality of our financial statements.

34

Table of Contents

Our ADSs may be delisted under the Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act if the PCAOB is unable to inspect auditors who are located in China. The delisting of our ADSs, or the threat of their being delisted, may materially and adversely affect the value of your investment.

The Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act, or the HFCAA, was enacted on December 18, 2020. The HFCAA, which became effective on January 1, 2021, states if the SEC determines that an issuer that is required to file reports under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or a registrant, has filed audit reports issued by a registered public accounting firm that has not been subject to inspection by the PCAOB for three consecutive years beginning in 2021, the SEC shall prohibit that registrant’s shares or ADSs from being traded on a national securities exchange or in the over-the-counter trading market in the U.S.

In September 2021, the PCAOB adopted a rule related to the PCAOB’s responsibilities under the HFCAA, which establishes a framework for the PCAOB to determine, as contemplated under the HFCAA, whether the PCAOB is unable to inspect or investigate completely registered public accounting firms located in a foreign jurisdiction because of a position taken by one or more authorities in that jurisdiction. The rule was approved by the SEC in November 2021.

On December 2, 2021, the SEC adopted final amendments implementing the disclosure and submission requirements of the Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act, or the HFCAA. The final amendments establish the SEC’s procedures for determining whether a registrant is a “Commission-Identified Issuer” under the HFCAA and prohibiting the trading of Commission-Identified Issuer’s securities. If the SEC determines that we are a Commission-Identified Issuer under the HFCAA for three consecutive years, or if the audit report filed as part of our annual report with the SEC is otherwise deemed not to be in compliance with the requirements of the Exchange Act due to the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, or the PCAOB’s inability to inspect our auditor, the SEC will prohibit our ordinary shares or the ADSs from being traded on a national securities exchange or in the over-the-counter trading market in the U.S. In the event of such determination, the Nasdaq is expected to delist our ADSs.

On December 16, 2021, the PCAOB issued a report to notify the SEC its determinations that it is unable to inspect or investigate completely PCAOB-registered public accounting firms headquartered in mainland China and Hong Kong, and identifies the registered public accounting firms in mainland China and Hong Kong that are subject to such determinations. Our auditors, KPMG Huazhen LLP and PricewaterhouseCoopers Zhong Tian LLP, the independent registered public accounting firms that issue the audit report included in the Form 20-F, is located in China and is included in the list of PCAOB identified firms in the determination report issued in December 2021.

Consequently, we were conclusively identified as a “Commission-Identified Issuer” on May 26, 2022.

On December 15, 2022, the PCAOB announced that it has secured complete access to inspect and investigate completely PCAOB-registered public accounting firms headquartered in mainland China and Hong Kong. The PCAOB also vacated its previous determinations issued in December 2021. Therefore, our auditor is currently able to be fully inspected and investigated by the PCAOB. Accordingly, until such time as the PCAOB issues any new determination, we are at no risk of having our securities subject to a trading prohibition under the HFCAA.

On December 29, 2022, the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023 was signed into law, which, among other things, amended the HFCAA to reduce to number of consecutive years an issuer can be identified a Commission-Identified Issuer before the SEC must impose an initial trading prohibition on the issuer’s securities from three years to two years. Therefore, once an issuer is identified as a Commission-Identified Issuer for two consecutive years, the SEC is required under the HCFAA to prohibit the trading of the issuer’s securities on a national securities exchange and in the over-the-counter market.

35

Table of Contents

Each year, the PCAOB will determine whether it can inspect and investigate completely audit firms in mainland China and Hong Kong, among other jurisdictions. If the PCAOB determines in the future that it no longer has full access to inspect and investigate completely accounting firms in mainland China and Hong Kong and we use an accounting firm headquartered in one of these jurisdictions to issue an audit report on our financial statements filed with the SEC, we would be identified as a Commission-Identified Issuer following the filing of the annual report on Form 20-F for the relevant fiscal year. In accordance with the HFCAA, our securities would be prohibited from being traded on a national securities exchange or in the over-the-counter trading market in the United States if we are identified as a Commission-Identified Issuer for two consecutive years in the future. The delisting of our ADSs, or the threat of their being delisted, may materially and adversely affect the value of your investment. If our ADSs are prohibited from trading in the United States, there is no certainty that we will be able to list on a non-U.S. exchange or that a market for our shares will develop outside of the United States. A prohibition of being able to trade in the United States would substantially impair your ability to sell or purchase our ADSs when you wish to do so, and the risk and uncertainty associated with delisting would have a negative impact on the price of our ADSs. Also, such a prohibition would significantly affect our ability to raise capital on terms acceptable to us, or at all, which would have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, and prospects.

Proceedings instituted by the SEC against “big four” PRC-based accounting firms, including our independent registered public accounting firms, could result in financial statements being determined to not be in compliance with the requirements of the Exchange Act.

Starting in 2011 “big four” PRC-based accounting firms, including our independent registered public accounting firms, were affected by a conflict between U.S. and Chinese law. Specifically, for certain U.S.-listed companies operating and audited in mainland China, the SEC and the PCAOB sought to obtain from the Chinese firms access to their audit work papers and related documents. The firms were, however, advised and directed that under Chinese law, they could not respond directly to the U.S. regulators on those requests, and that requests by foreign regulators for access to such papers in China had to be channeled through the CSRC.

In late 2012, this impasse led the SEC to commence administrative proceedings under Rule 102(e) of its Rules of Practice and also under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 against the Chinese accounting firms, including our independent registered public accounting firms. A first instance trial of the proceedings in July 2013 in the SEC’s internal administrative court resulted in an adverse judgment against the firms. The administrative law judge proposed penalties on the firms including a temporary suspension of their right to practice before the SEC, although that proposed penalty did not take effect pending review by the Commissioners of the SEC. On February 6, 2015, before a review by the Commissioner had taken place, the firms reached a settlement with the SEC. Under the settlement, the SEC accepted that future requests by the SEC for the production of documents will normally be made to the CSRC. The firms were to receive matching Section 106 requests, and were required to abide by a detailed set of procedures with respect to such requests, which in substance require them to facilitate production via the CSRC. If they failed to meet specified criteria, the SEC retained authority to impose a variety of additional remedial measures on the firms depending on the nature of the failure.

Under the terms of the settlement, the underlying proceeding against the four China-based accounting firms was deemed dismissed with prejudice four years after entry of the settlement. The four-year mark occurred on February 6, 2019. While we cannot predict if the SEC will further challenge the four China-based accounting firms’ compliance with U.S. law in connection with U.S. regulatory requests for audit work papers or if the results of such a challenge would result in the SEC imposing penalties such as suspensions. If additional remedial measures are imposed on the “big four” PRC-based accounting firms, including our independent registered public accounting firms, we could be unable to timely file future financial statements in compliance with the requirements of the Exchange Act.

36

Table of Contents

In the event the “big four” PRC-based accounting firms become subject to additional legal challenges by the SEC or PCAOB, depending upon the final outcome, listed companies in the United States with major PRC operations may find it difficult or impossible to retain auditors in respect of their operations in China, which could result in financial statements being determined to not be in compliance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, including possible delisting. Moreover, any negative news about any such future proceedings against these audit firms may cause investor uncertainty regarding China-based, U.S.-listed companies and the market price of our common stock may be adversely affected.

If our independent registered public accounting firms were denied, even temporarily, the ability to practice before the SEC and we were unable to timely find other registered public accounting firms to audit and issue an opinion on our financial statements, our financial statements could be determined not to be in compliance with the requirements of the Exchange Act. Such a determination could ultimately lead to the delisting of the ADSs from the Nasdaq Global Market or deregistration from the SEC, or both, which would substantially reduce or effectively terminate the trading of the ADSs in the United States.

Our corporate structure may restrict our ability to receive dividends from, and transfer funds to, our PRC operating subsidiaries, which could restrict our ability to act in response to changing market conditions in a timely manner.

We are a holding company incorporated in Cayman Islands and conduct our operation through our operating subsidiaries. The ability of our operating subsidiaries to make dividend and other payments to us may be restricted by factors that include changes in applicable foreign exchange and other laws and regulations.

In particular, under the PRC law, each of our PRC operating subsidiaries may only pay dividends after 10% of its net profit has been set aside as reserve funds, unless such reserves have reached at least 50% of its registered capital. In addition, the profit available for distribution from our PRC operating subsidiaries is determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the PRC. This calculation may differ if it were performed in accordance with U.S. GAAP. As a result, we may not have sufficient distributions from our PRC operating subsidiaries to enable necessary profit distributions to our shareholders in the future, which would be based upon our financial statements prepared under U.S. GAAP.

Distributions by our PRC operating subsidiaries to us other than as dividends may be subject to governmental approval and taxation. Any transfer of funds from our company to our PRC operating subsidiaries, either as a shareholder loan or as an increase in registered capital, is subject to registration or approval of PRC governmental authorities, including the relevant administration of foreign exchange and/or the relevant examining and approval authority. These limitations on the free flow of funds between us and our PRC subsidiaries could restrict our ability to act in response to changing market conditions in a timely manner.

Dividends payable by us to our foreign investors and gains on the sale of the ADSs may become subject to withholding taxes under the PRC tax laws.

Pursuant to the Enterprise Income Tax Law of the PRC (《中华人民共和国企业所得税法》), or the EIT Law, and EIT implementation rules, our foreign corporate shareholders may be subject to a 10% income tax upon any gains realized from the transfer of their ADSs and dividends distributable to such foreign corporate shareholder, if such income is regarded as income from “sources within the PRC.” According to the EIT implementation rules, whether income generated from transferring equity investments is to be regarded as sources within the PRC or from foreign territory shall depend upon the locations in which the enterprises accepting the equity investment are located. However, it is unclear whether income received by our shareholders will be deemed to be income from sources within the PRC and whether there will be any exemption or reduction in taxation for our foreign corporate shareholders due to the promulgation of the EIT Law. If our foreign corporate shareholders are required to pay PRC income tax on the transfers of the ADSs that they hold or on the gains on the sale of the ADSs by them, the value of our foreign corporate shareholders’ investments in the ADSs may be materially and adversely affected.

37

Table of Contents

We may be classified as a “resident enterprise” for PRC enterprise income tax purposes, which could result in unfavorable tax consequences to us and our non-PRC shareholders.

The EIT Law provides that enterprises established outside of the PRC whose “de facto management bodies” are located in the PRC are considered “resident enterprises” and are generally subject to the uniform 25% enterprise income tax rate on their worldwide income. In addition, a circular issued by the State Administration of Taxation on April 22, 2009 regarding the standards used to classify certain Chinese-invested enterprises controlled by Chinese enterprises or Chinese group enterprises and established outside of the PRC as “resident enterprises” clarified that dividends and other income paid by such “resident enterprises” will be considered to be PRC source income, subject to PRC withholding tax, currently at a rate of 10%, when recognized by non-PRC enterprise shareholders. This circular also subjects such “resident enterprises” to various reporting requirements with the PRC tax authorities. Under the implementation regulations to the enterprise income tax, a “de facto management body” is defined as a body that has material and overall management and control over the manufacturing and business operations, personnel and human resources, finances and properties of an enterprise. In addition, the circular mentioned above sets out criteria for determining whether “de facto management bodies” are located in the PRC for overseas incorporated, domestically controlled enterprises. However, as this circular only applies to enterprises established outside of the PRC that are controlled by PRC enterprises or groups of PRC enterprises, it remains unclear how the tax authorities will determine the location of “de facto management bodies” for overseas incorporated enterprises that are controlled by individual PRC residents like us and some of our subsidiaries outside China. Therefore, although certain of our management is currently located in the PRC, it remains unclear whether the PRC tax authorities would require or permit our overseas registered entities to be treated as PRC resident enterprises. We do not currently consider our company to be a PRC resident enterprise. However, if the PRC tax authorities disagree with our assessment and determine that we are a “resident enterprise,” we may be subject to enterprise income tax at a rate of 25% on our worldwide income and dividends paid by us to our non-PRC shareholders as well as capital gains recognized by them with respect to the sale of the ADSs may be subject to a PRC withholding tax.

This will have an impact on our effective tax rate, a material adverse effect on our net income and results of operations, and may require us to withhold tax on our non-PRC shareholders.

Government control of foreign currency conversion may affect the value of your investment.

The PRC government imposes controls on the convertibility of Renminbi into foreign currencies and, in certain cases, the remittance of currency out of the PRC. Under existing PRC foreign exchange regulations, payments of certain current account items can be made in foreign currencies without prior approval from the local branch of the SAFE by complying with certain procedural requirements. However, approval from appropriate government authorities is required where Renminbi is to be converted into foreign currency and remitted out of the PRC to pay capital expenses such as the repayment of bank loans denominated in foreign currencies. The restrictions on foreign exchange transactions under capital accounts could also affect the ability of our subsidiaries in the PRC to obtain foreign exchange through debt or equity financing, including by means of loans or capital contributions from us. The PRC government may also at its discretion restrict access in the future to foreign currencies for current account transactions.

Risks Relating to Doing Business in International Markets outside the PRC

We face risks associated with the expansion of our scale of operations globally, and if we are unable to effectively manage these risks, they could impair our ability to expand our business abroad.

As part of our growth strategy, we plan to further expand our sales globally. As we continue to grow our business and expand our operations globally, we will continue to sell our products into new jurisdictions in which we have limited or no experience and in which our brands may be less recognized. The expansion exposes us to a number of risks, including:

38

Table of Contents

If we are unable to effectively manage these risks, our ability to expand our business abroad will be impaired, which could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Risks Relating to the ADSs

The trading price of the ADSs is likely to be volatile, which could result in substantial losses to investors.

The trading price of the ADSs is likely to be volatile and could fluctuate widely due to factors beyond our control. This may happen because of broad market and industry factors, including the fluctuations of Bitcoin price and performance and fluctuation of the market prices of other companies with business operations located mainly in China that have listed their securities in the United States. The securities of some of these companies have experienced significant volatility since their initial public offerings, including, in some cases, substantial price declines in their trading prices. The trading performances of other PRC companies’ securities after their offerings may affect the attitudes of investors toward PRC companies listed in the United States in general and consequently may impact the trading performance of our ADSs, regardless of our actual operating performance.

In addition to market and industry factors, the price and trading volume of our ADSs may be highly volatile due to factors specific to our own operations, including the following:

39

Table of Contents

Any of these factors may result in large and sudden changes in the volume and price at which our ADSs will trade.

In the past, shareholders of public companies have often brought securities class action suits against those companies following periods of instability in the market price of their securities. On March 4, 2020, a putative class action was filed in the United States District Court of Oregon (the “Federal Action”) against us and certain of our officers and directors, among others. The complaint alleges that our registration statement on Form F-1, initially filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 28, 2019 (File No. 333-234356), contained material misstatements and omissions in violation of federal securities laws. On March 6, 2020, another putative class action, making substantially similar allegations, was filed in New York County Supreme Court (the “State Action”) against us and certain of our officers and directors. On June 1, 2020, we filed a motion to stay all proceedings in the State Action pending adjudication of the Federal Action, which was granted on July 21, 2020. Subsequently, the Federal Action was transferred to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (the “Court”) on September 2, 2020. On October 7, 2020, lead plaintiffs in the Federal Action filed an amended complaint asserting claims under Section 11 of the Securities Act and Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act for that the registration statement failed to disclose three alleged related party transactions. On December 7, 2020, we filed a motion to dismiss in the Federal Action and our motion to dismiss the amended complaint in the Federal Action. On July 8, 2021, the Court dismissed the first amended complaint but allowed plaintiffs to file a second amended complaint by August 6, 2021. On August 6, 2021, plaintiffs filed a letter motion for leave to file a second amended complaint. On August 27, 2021, we filed a letter response to oppose plaintiffs’ August 6, 2021 letter motion and to seek a final judgment dismissing the Federal Action to be entered. On March 31, 2022, the Court denied plaintiffs’ motion for leave to file a second amended complaint as futile and dismissed Plaintiffs’ claims with prejudice. Plaintiffs did not appeal. Following dismissal with prejudice of the Federal Action, plaintiff voluntarily discontinued the State Action with prejudice on June 2, 2022.

On April 15, 2021, a new putative class action was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York against us and certain of our officers and directors. The complaint alleges that our statements in February 2021 about increased visibility into revenue and the size and quality of orders we were receiving were materially false and misleading. Plaintiff claims that the truth about our revenue was revealed in April 2021, when we announced our latest financial results. On December 9, 2021, the Court appointed Bill Lu and Liying Huang as lead plaintiffs and Brager Eagle & Squire, P.C. as lead plaintiffs’ counsel. On February 7, 2022, lead plaintiffs filed an amended complaint asserting the same claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act against the same set of defendants. The amended complaint alleges our November 30, 2020 and February 10, 2021 press releases and the April 9, 2021 interview of our chief executive officer in an article published by Decrypt contained were false and misleading statements regarding the pre-sale orders we had received and our ability to secure sufficient chip supply to meet the increasing demand for mining machines, because those statements allegedly left “investors with the false impression that revenue in the fourth quarter 2020 would be solid” and allegedly omitted that the pre-sale orders were locked in at lower prices than the re-bounding Bitcoin market prices during the third quarter of 2019 and fourth quarter of 2020, and we had been experiencing significant supply chain disruptions during the fourth quarter of 2020. On April 8, 2022, we filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint, which has been fully briefed as of July 7, 2022. As of the date of this annual report, the Court issued an order granting our motion to dismiss the case in its entirety. The Court granted lead plaintiffs leave to further amend their amended complaint, the deadline of which is April 26, 2023.The class action suits that we are aware of and if we were involved in a class action suit in the future, it could divert a significant amount of our management’s attention and other resources from our business and operations and require us to incur significant expenses to defend the suit, which could harm our results of operations. Any such class action suit, whether or not successful, could harm our reputation and restrict our ability to raise capital in the future. In addition, if a claim is successfully made against us, we may be required to pay significant damages, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

40

Table of Contents

If securities or industry analysts do not publish research or reports about our business, or if they adversely change their recommendations regarding the ADSs, the market price for the ADSs and trading volume could decline.

The trading market for the ADSs will be influenced by research or reports that industry or securities analysts publish about our business. If one or more analysts who cover us downgrade the ADSs or lower down the target price of our ADSs, the market price for the ADSs would likely decline. If one or more of these analysts cease to cover us or fail to regularly publish reports on us, we could lose visibility in the financial markets, which could, in turn, cause the market price or trading volume for the ADSs to decline.

Because we do not expect to pay dividends in the foreseeable future, you must rely on price appreciation of the ADSs for a return on your investment.

We currently intend to retain most, if not all, of our available funds and any future earnings to fund the development and growth of our business. As a result, we do not expect to pay any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Therefore, you should not rely on an investment in our ADSs as a source for any future dividend income.

Our board of directors has discretion as to whether to distribute dividends, subject to certain requirements of Cayman Islands law. Under Cayman Islands law, a Cayman Islands company may pay a dividend out of either profit or share premium account, provided that in no circumstances may a dividend be paid if this would result in the company being unable to pay its debts as they fall due in the ordinary course of business. Even if our board of directors decides to declare and pay dividends, the timing, amount and form of future dividends, if any, will depend on our future results of operations and cash flow, our capital requirements and surplus, the amount of distributions, if any, received by us from our subsidiaries, our financial condition, contractual restrictions and other factors deemed relevant by our board of directors. Accordingly, the return on your investment in the ADSs will likely depend entirely upon any future price appreciation of the ADSs. There is no guarantee that the ADSs will appreciate in value or even maintain the price at which you purchased the ADSs. You may not realize a return on your investment in the ADSs, and you may even lose your entire investment in the ADSs.

The dual-class structure of our ordinary shares may adversely affect the trading market for our ADSs.

Certain shareholder advisory firms have announced changes to their eligibility criteria for inclusion of shares of public companies on certain indices, including the S&P 500, to exclude companies with multiple classes of shares and companies whose public shareholders hold no more than 5% of total voting power from being added to such indices. In addition, several shareholder advisory firms have announced their opposition to the use of multiple class structures. As a result, the dual-class structure of our ordinary shares may prevent the inclusion of our ADSs representing Class A ordinary shares in such indices and may cause some shareholder advisory firms to publish negative commentary about our corporate governance practices or otherwise seek to cause us to change our capital structure. Any such exclusion from indices could result in a less active trading market for our ADSs. Any negative actions or publications by shareholder advisory firms could also adversely affect the value of our ADSs.

Our Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association contain anti-takeover provisions that could have a material adverse effect on the rights of holders of our Class A ordinary shares and ADSs.

Our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association contain provisions to limit the ability of others to acquire control of our company or cause us to engage in change-of-control transactions, including a provision that entitles each Class B ordinary share to 15 votes in respect of all matters subject to a shareholders’ vote. These provisions could have the effect of depriving our shareholders of an opportunity to sell their shares at a premium over prevailing market prices by discouraging third parties from seeking to obtain control of our company in a tender offer or similar transaction. If any Class B ordinary shares are converted into Class A ordinary shares or canceled for any reasons, our board of directors will have the authority without further action by our shareholders to issue additional Class B ordinary shares, which will be dilutive to our Class A ordinary shareholders. In addition, our board of directors has the authority, without further action by our shareholders, to issue preferred shares in one or more series and to fix their designations, powers, preferences, privileges, and relative participating, optional or special rights and the qualifications, limitations or restrictions, including dividend rights, conversion rights, voting rights, terms of redemption and liquidation preferences, any or all of which may be greater than the rights associated with our Class A ordinary shares, in the form of ADS or otherwise. We could issue preferred shares quickly with terms calculated to delay or prevent a change in control of our company or make removal of management more difficult. If our board of directors decides to issue preferred shares, the price of our ADSs may fall and the voting and other rights of the holders of our Class A ordinary shares and ADSs may be materially and adversely affected.

41

Table of Contents

You may face difficulties in protecting your interests, and your ability to protect your rights through U.S. courts may be limited because we are incorporated under Cayman Islands law.

We are an exempted company incorporated under the laws of the Cayman Islands. Our corporate affairs are governed by, among other things, our memorandum and articles of association, as amended, the Companies Act of the Cayman Islands, as amended and the common law of the Cayman Islands. The rights of shareholders to take action against our directors, actions by our minority shareholders and the fiduciary duties of our directors to us under the Cayman Islands law are to a large extent governed by the common law of the Cayman Islands. The common law of the Cayman Islands is derived in part from comparatively limited judicial precedent in the Cayman Islands as well as from the common law of England, the decisions of whose courts are of persuasive authority, but are not binding, on a court in the Cayman Islands. The rights of our shareholders and the fiduciary duties of our directors under Cayman Islands law are not as clearly established as they would be under statutes or judicial precedent in some jurisdictions in the United States. In particular, the Cayman Islands have a less developed body of securities laws than the United States. In addition, Cayman Islands companies may not have standing to initiate a shareholder derivative action in a federal court of the United States.

Shareholders of Cayman Islands exempted companies like us have no general rights under Cayman Islands law to inspect corporate records (other than the memorandum and articles of association, our register of mortgages and charges and special resolutions of our shareholders) or to obtain copies of lists of shareholders of these companies. Our directors have discretion under our articles of association to determine whether or not, and under what conditions, our corporate records may be inspected by our shareholders, but are not obligated to make them available to our shareholders. This may make it more difficult for you to obtain the information needed to establish any facts necessary for a shareholder motion or to solicit proxies from other shareholders in connection with a proxy contest.

Certain corporate governance practices in the Cayman Islands, which is our home country, differ significantly from requirements for companies incorporated in other jurisdictions such as the United States. We may follow the home country practice for certain corporate governance practices after the closing of our initial public offering which may differ from the requirements of the Nasdaq Global Market. If we choose to follow the home country practice, our shareholders may be afforded less protection than they otherwise would under rules and regulations applicable to U.S. domestic issuers.

As a result of all of the above, our public shareholders may have more difficulty in protecting their interests in the face of actions taken by management, members of the board of directors or controlling shareholders than they would as public shareholders of a company incorporated in the United States.

Certain judgments obtained against us by our shareholders may not be enforceable.

We are a Cayman Islands exempted company and a large portion of our assets are located outside of the United States. A substantial portion of current operations are conducted in China. In addition, all of our current directors and officers are nationals and residents of countries other than the United States. A substantial portion of the assets of these persons are located outside the United States. As a result, it may be difficult or impossible for you to bring an action against us or against these individuals in the United States in the event that you believe that your rights have been infringed under the U.S. federal securities laws or otherwise. Even if you are successful in bringing an action of this kind, the laws of the Cayman Islands and of China may render you unable to enforce a judgment against our assets or the assets of our directors and officers.

Fluctuations in the exchange rate between the Renminbi and the U.S. dollars, Hong Kong dollars and Singapore dollars could result in foreign currency exchange losses and could materially reduce the value of your investment.

Our sales in China are denominated in Renminbi, and our international sales are generally denominated in U.S. dollars. Our costs and capital expenditures are largely denominated in Renminbi and foreign currencies, including U.S. dollars, Hong Kong dollars and Singapore dollars. Fluctuations in exchange rates could affect our net profit margins and could result in foreign exchange and operating gains or losses. In addition, our foreign currency exchange losses may be magnified by PRC exchange control regulations that restrict our ability to convert Renminbi into foreign currencies.

The value of the Renminbi against the U.S. dollars, Hong Kong dollars, Singapore dollars and other local currencies is affected by, among other things, changes in China’s political and economic conditions and China’s foreign exchange policies. In the long term, Renminbi may further depreciate against U.S. dollars or other foreign currencies, depending on the market supply and demand with reference to a basket of currencies. It is difficult to predict how long this current situation may last and when and how it may change again.

42

Table of Contents

In addition, we are a holding company and we rely on dividends primarily from our PRC operating subsidiaries for our cash needs. Although we have not received any dividend from our operating subsidiaries in the PRC, we may receive such dividends in the future. Any significant revaluation of the Renminbi may materially and adversely affect our results of operations and financial position reported in Renminbi when translated into U.S. dollars, and the value of, and any dividends payable on, the ADSs in U.S. dollars. To the extent that we need to convert U.S. dollars we receive from our initial public offering into Renminbi for our operations, appreciation of the Renminbi against the U.S. dollars would have an adverse effect on the Renminbi amount we would receive. Conversely, if we decide to convert our Renminbi into U.S. dollars for the purpose of making payments for dividends on our ordinary shares or ADSs or for other business purposes, appreciation of the U.S. dollars against the Renminbi would have a negative effect on the U.S. dollars amount.

We are an emerging growth company within the meaning of the Securities Act and may take advantage of certain reduced reporting requirements.

We are an “emerging growth company,” as defined in the JOBS Act, and we may take advantage of certain exemptions from requirements applicable to other public companies that are not emerging growth companies including, most significantly, not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for so long as we are an emerging growth company though we opted to comply with such requirement and had KPMG Huazhen LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, issue a report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. We will remain an emerging growth company until the earliest of (a) the last day of our fiscal year during which we have total annual gross revenues of at least US$1.235 billion; (b) the last day of our fiscal year following the fifth anniversary of the completion of our initial public offering; (c) the date on which we have, during the previous three year period, issued more than US$1.0 billion in non-convertible debt; or (d) the date on which we are deemed to be a “large accelerated filer” under the Exchange Act, which would occur if the market value of ADSs that are held by non-affiliates exceeds US$700 million as of the last business day of our most recently completed second fiscal quarter.

The JOBS Act also provides that an emerging growth company does not need to comply with any new or revised financial accounting standards until such date that a private company is otherwise required to comply with such new or revised accounting standards. We intend to avail ourselves of the extended transition period.

We are a foreign private issuer within the meaning of the rules under the Exchange Act, and as such we are exempt from certain provisions applicable to United States domestic public companies.

We currently report under the Exchange Act as a non-U.S. company with foreign private issuer status. Because we qualify as a foreign private issuer under the Exchange Act, we are exempt from certain provisions of the Exchange Act that are applicable to U.S. domestic public companies, including:

We are required to file an annual report on Form 20-F within four months of the end of each fiscal year. In addition, we intend to publish our results on a quarterly basis through press releases, distributed pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Nasdaq Global Market. Press releases relating to financial results and material events will also be furnished to the SEC on Form 6-K. However, the information we are required to file with or furnish to the SEC will be less extensive and less timely than that required to be filed with the SEC by U.S. domestic issuers. As a result, you may not be afforded the same protections or information that would be made available to you were you investing in a U.S. domestic issuer.

43

Table of Contents

The voting rights of holders of ADSs are limited by the terms of the deposit agreement, and you may not be able to exercise your right to vote your ordinary shares.

As a holder of the ADSs, you will only be able to exercise the voting rights with respect to the underlying Class A ordinary shares represented by your ADSs in accordance with the provisions of the deposit agreement. Under the deposit agreement, you must vote by giving voting instructions to the depositary. Upon receipt of your voting instructions, the depositary will vote the underlying Class A ordinary shares represented by your ADSs in accordance with these instructions. You will not be able to directly exercise your right to vote with respect to the underlying ordinary shares represented by your ADSs unless you cancel and withdraw such ordinary shares. Under our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association, the minimum notice period required for convening a general meeting is at least ten calendar days. When a general meeting is convened, you may not receive sufficient advance notice to withdraw the underlying Class A ordinary shares represented by your ADSs to allow you to vote with respect to any specific matter. If we ask for your instructions, the depositary will notify you of the upcoming vote and will arrange to deliver our voting materials to you. We cannot assure you that you will receive the voting materials in time to ensure that you can instruct the depositary to vote the underlying Class A ordinary shares represented by your ADSs. In addition, the depositary and its agents are not responsible for failing to carry out voting instructions or for their manner of carrying out your voting instructions. This means that you may not be able to exercise your right to vote and you may have no legal remedy if the underlying Class A ordinary shares represented by your ADSs are not voted as you requested.

The depositary for the ADSs will give us a discretionary proxy to vote our ordinary shares underlying your ADSs if you do not vote at shareholders’ meetings, except in limited circumstances, which could adversely affect your interests.

Under the deposit agreement for the ADSs, if you do not vote, the depositary may give us a discretionary proxy to vote the ordinary shares underlying the ADSs at shareholders’ meetings if we have timely provided the depositary with notice of meeting and related voting materials and (i) we have instructed the depositary that we wish a discretionary proxy to be given, (ii) we have informed the depositary that there is no substantial opposition as to a matter to be voted on at the meeting, and (iii) a matter to be voted on at the meeting would not have a material adverse impact on shareholders.

The effect of this discretionary proxy is that you cannot prevent the underlying ordinary shares represented by the ADSs from being voted, except under the circumstances described above. This may make it more difficult for holders to influence the management of the Company. Holders of ordinary shares are not subject to this discretionary proxy.

ADS holders may not be entitled to a jury trial with respect to claims arising under the deposit agreement, which could result in less favorable outcomes to the plaintiff(s) in any such action.

The deposit agreement governing the ADSs representing our Class A ordinary shares provides that, to the fullest extent permitted by law, ADS holders waive the right to a jury trial of any claim they may have against us or the depositary arising out of or relating to our shares, the ADSs or the deposit agreement, including any claim under the U.S. federal securities laws. As the waiver relates to claims arising as a matter of contract in relation to the ADSs, we believe that, as a matter of construction of the clause, the waiver would likely to continue to apply to ADS holders who withdraw the Class A ordinary shares represented by the ADSs from the ADS facility with respect to claims arising before the withdrawal, and the waiver would most likely not apply to ADS holders who subsequently withdraw the Class A ordinary shares represented by ADSs from the ADS facility with respect to claims arising after the withdrawal. However, to our knowledge, there has been no case law on the applicability of the jury trial waiver to ADS holders who subsequently withdraw the Class A ordinary shares represented by the ADSs from the ADS facility.

If we or the depositary oppose a jury trial demand based on the waiver, the court would determine whether the waiver was enforceable based on the facts and circumstances of that case in accordance with the applicable state and federal law. To our knowledge, the enforceability of a contractual pre-dispute jury trial waiver in connection with claims arising under the federal securities laws has not been finally adjudicated by the United States Supreme Court. However, we believe that a contractual pre-dispute jury trial waiver provision is generally enforceable, including under the laws of the State of New York, which govern the deposit agreement, by a federal or state court in the City of New York, which has non-exclusive jurisdiction over matters arising under the deposit agreement. In determining whether to enforce a contractual pre-dispute jury trial waiver provision, courts will generally consider whether a party knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily has waived the right to a jury trial. We believe that this is the case with respect to the deposit agreement and the ADSs. It is advisable that you consult legal counsel regarding the jury waiver provision before investing in the ADSs.

44

Table of Contents

If you or any other holders or beneficial owners of ADSs, including purchasers of ADSs in secondary market transactions, bring a claim against us or the depositary in connection with matters arising under the deposit agreement or the ADSs, including claims under federal securities laws, you or such other holder or beneficial owner may not be entitled to a jury trial with respect to such claims, which may have the effect of increasing the cost of bringing a claim and limiting and discouraging lawsuits against us and the depositary. If a lawsuit is brought against either or both of us and the depositary under the deposit agreement, it may be heard only by a judge or justice of the applicable trial court, which would be conducted according to different civil procedures and may result in different outcomes than a trial by jury would have, including results that could be less favorable to the plaintiff(s) in any such action.

Nevertheless, if this jury trial waiver provision is not permitted by applicable law, an action could proceed under the terms of the deposit agreement with a jury trial. No condition, stipulation or provision of the deposit agreement or ADSs serves as a waiver by any holder or beneficial owner of ADSs or by us or the depositary of compliance with U.S. federal securities laws and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder.

You have the right to arbitration under the deposit agreement. However, it may not be most beneficial.

The deposit agreement provides that ADS holders and the depositary have the right to elect to have any claim they may have against us arising out of or relating to the Class A ordinary shares or ADSs or the deposit agreement settled by arbitration in New York, New York rather than in a court of law, and to have any judgment rendered by the arbitrators entered in any court having jurisdiction. An arbitral tribunal in any such arbitration would not have the authority to award any consequential, special, or punitive damages and its award would have to conform to the provisions of the deposit agreement. The deposit agreement does not give us the right to require that any claim, whether brought by us or against us, be arbitrated.

The deposit agreement may be amended or terminated without your consent.

We may amend or terminate the deposit agreement without your consent. If you continue to hold your ADSs after an amendment to the deposit agreement, you agree to be bound by the deposit agreement as amended. However, amendment to certain rights that may increase costs or prejudice a substantial right of ADS holders will not take effect until 30 days after notice thereof in accordance with the deposit agreement.

You, as holders of ADSs, may have fewer rights than holders of our ordinary shares and must act through the depositary to exercise those rights.

Holders of ADSs do not have the same rights as our registered shareholders. As a holder of the ADSs, you will not have any direct right to attend general meetings of our shareholders or to cast any votes at such meetings. You will only be able to exercise the voting rights that are carried by the underlying Class A ordinary shares represented by your ADSs indirectly in accordance with the provisions of the deposit agreement. Under the deposit agreement, you may vote only by giving voting instructions to the depositary. Upon receipt of your voting instructions, the depositary will try, as far as is practicable, to vote the underlying Class A ordinary shares represented by your ADSs in accordance with your instructions. If we ask for your instructions, then upon receipt of your voting instructions, the depositary will try to vote the underlying Class A ordinary shares represented by your ADSs in accordance with these instructions. If we do not instruct the depositary to ask for your instructions, the depositary may still vote in accordance with instructions you give, but it is not required to do so. You will not be able to directly exercise your right to vote with respect to the underlying ordinary shares represented by your ADSs unless you withdraw such ordinary shares and become the registered holder of such shares prior to the record date for the general meeting.

You may experience dilution of your holdings due to the inability to participate in rights offerings.

We may, from time to time, distribute rights to our shareholders, including rights to acquire securities. Under the deposit agreement, the depositary will not distribute rights to holders of ADSs unless the distribution and sale of rights and the securities to which these rights relate are either exempt from registration under the Securities Act with respect to all holders of ADSs, or are registered under the provisions of the Securities Act. The depositary may, but is not required to, attempt to sell these undistributed rights to third parties, and may allow the rights to lapse. We may be unable to establish an exemption from registration under the Securities Act, and we are under no obligation to file a registration statement with respect to these rights or underlying securities or to endeavor to have a registration statement declared effective. Accordingly, holders of ADSs may be unable to participate in our rights offerings and may experience dilution of their holdings as a result.

45

Table of Contents

You may be subject to limitations on the transfer of your ADSs.

Your ADSs are transferable on the books of the depositary. However, the depositary may close its books at any time or from time to time when it deems it expedient in connection with the performance of its duties. The depositary may close its books from time to time for a number of reasons, including in connection with corporate events such as a rights offering, during which time the depositary needs to maintain an exact number of ADS holders on its books for a specified period. The depositary may also close its books in emergencies, and on weekends and public holidays. The depositary may refuse to deliver, transfer or register transfers of our ADSs generally when our share register or the books of the depositary are closed, or at any time if we or the depositary thinks it is advisable to do so because of any requirement of law or of any government or governmental body, or under any provision of the deposit agreement, or for any other reason.

If we fail to maintain an effective system of internal controls, our ability to accurately and timely report our financial results or prevent fraud may be adversely affected, and investor confidence and the market price of the ADSs may be adversely affected.

We are subject to reporting obligations under the U.S. securities laws. The SEC, as required under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, adopted rules requiring every public company to include a management report on such company’s internal control over financial reporting in its annual report, which contains management’s assessment of the effectiveness of the company’s internal control over financial reporting. We were subject to such requirement starting from fiscal year 2020. In addition, once we cease to be an “emerging growth company,” as such term is defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 (as amended by the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act of 2015), or the JOBS Act, an independent registered public accounting firm for a public company must issue an attestation report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. However, we opted to have KPMG Huazhen LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, issue a report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, despite the fact that, as an emerging growth company, we are not legally required to do so.

In 2020 and 2021, we and our independent registered public accounting firms identified two material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our company’s annual or interim consolidated financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. We have implemented a number of measures to address the material weakness that had been identified. For details of these remedial measures, see “Item 15. Controls and Procedures—Remediation of the Material Weakness in Internal Control over Financial Reporting.” While, as of December 31, 2022, based on our management’s assessment on the performance of the remediation measures, we determined that the material weakness had been remediated, in the future we may determine that we have additional material weaknesses, or our independent registered public accounting firm may disagree with our management assessment of the effectiveness of our internal controls.

Our management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2022. See “Item 15. Controls and Procedures—Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting.”

However, if we fail to maintain the adequacy of our internal control over financial reporting, as these standards are modified, supplemented or amended from time to time, we may not be able to conclude on an ongoing basis that we have effective internal control over financial reporting in accordance with Section 404. If we fail to achieve and maintain an effective internal control environment, we could suffer material misstatements in our financial statements and fail to meet our reporting obligations, which would likely cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information. This could in turn limit our access to capital markets, harm our results of operations, and lead to a decline in the trading price of the ADSs. Additionally, ineffective internal control over financial reporting could expose us to increased risk of fraud or misuse of corporate assets and subject us to potential delisting from the stock exchange on which we list, regulatory investigations and civil or criminal sanctions. We may also be required to restate our financial statements for prior periods. Furthermore, we have incurred and anticipate that we will continue to incur considerable costs, management time and other resources in an effort to comply with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and other requirements. Moreover, ineffective internal control over financial reporting could significantly hinder our ability to prevent fraud.

We have incurred and expect to continue to incur significant costs as a public company, which could lower our profits or make it more difficult to run our business.

As a public company, we have incurred and expect to continue to incur significant legal, accounting and other expenses that we did not incur as a private company to ensure that we comply with the various requirements on corporate governance practices imposed by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as well as rules subsequently implemented by the SEC and Nasdaq Global Market.

46

Table of Contents

For example, we have increased the number of independent directors and adopted policies regarding internal controls and disclosure controls and procedures. We have also incurred additional costs associated with our public company reporting requirements. We expect that these rules and regulations will continue to cause us to incur elevated legal and financial compliance costs, devote substantial management effort to ensure compliance and make some corporate activities more time-consuming and costly. We are currently evaluating and monitoring developments with respect to these rules and regulations, and we cannot predict or estimate with any degree of certainty the amount of additional costs we may incur or the timing of such costs.

As a company with less than US$1.235 billion in net revenues for our last financial year, we qualify as an “emerging growth company” pursuant to the JOBS Act. An emerging growth company may take advantage of specified reduced reporting and other requirements that are otherwise applicable generally to public companies. These provisions include exemption from the auditor attestation requirement under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 in the assessment of the emerging growth company’s internal control over financial reporting and permission to delay adopting new or revised accounting standards until such time as those standards apply to private companies. Once we are no longer an “emerging growth company,” we expect to incur significant expenses and devote substantial management effort toward ensuring compliance with the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the other rules and regulations of the SEC. However, we opted to have KPMG Huazhen LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, issue a report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, despite the fact that, as an emerging growth company, we are not legally required to do so.

In the past, shareholders of a public company often brought securities class action suits against companies following periods of instability in the market price of those companies’ securities. If we were involved in a class action suit, it could divert a significant amount of our management’s attention and other resources from our business and operations, which could harm our results of operations and require us to incur significant expenses to defend the suit. Any such class action suit, whether or not successful, could harm our reputation and restrict our ability to raise capital in the future. In addition, if a claim is successfully made against us, we may be required to pay significant damages, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

As a foreign private issuer, we are permitted to adopt certain home country practices in relation to corporate governance matters that differ significantly from the requirements of the Nasdaq Stock Market Rules; these practices may afford less protection to shareholders than they would enjoy if we complied fully with the Nasdaq Stock Market Rules.

As a Cayman Islands exempted company listed on the Nasdaq Global Market, we are subject to the Nasdaq Stock Market Rules. However, a foreign private issuer may elect to comply with the practice of its home country and not to comply with certain Nasdaq corporate governance requirements, including the requirements that (i) a majority of the board of directors consists of independent directors, (ii) a nominating and corporate governance committee be established that is composed entirely of independent directors and has a written charter addressing the committee’s purpose and responsibilities, (iii) a compensation committee be established that is composed entirely of independent directors and has a written charter addressing the committee’s purpose and responsibilities, and (iv) an annual meeting of shareholders be held no later than one year after the end of the issuer’s fiscal year-end. Although we have similar practices, they do not entirely conform to the Nasdaq requirements; therefore, we currently use these exemptions and intend to continue using them. Accordingly, investors will not have the same protections provided to shareholders of companies that are subject to all Nasdaq corporate governance requirements.

There can be no assurance that we will not be a passive foreign investment company for U.S. federal income tax purposes, which could result in adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences to U.S. Holders of our ADSs or ordinary shares.

Based upon the market price of our ADSs, the value of our assets and the nature and composition of our income and assets, we believe we were not a PFIC for our taxable year ended December 31, 2022, although there can be no assurance in this regard.

In general, we will be a PFIC for any taxable year if, applying the applicable look-through rules, either:

47

Table of Contents

The determination of whether we are a PFIC is made annually and involves extensive factual investigation, including ascertaining the fair market value of all of our assets on a quarterly basis and the character of each item of income that we earn during the relevant taxable year, and is subject to uncertainty in several respects. The determination of whether we will be a PFIC for any taxable year may also depend in part upon the value of our goodwill and other unbooked intangibles not reflected on our balance sheet (which may depend upon the market price of our ADSs or ordinary shares from time to time, which may fluctuate significantly) and also may be affected by how, and how quickly, we spend our liquid assets and the cash we generate from our operations and raise in any offering. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that we will not be a PFIC for our current or any future taxable year. The U.S. Internal Revenue Service, or the IRS, does not issue rulings with respect to PFIC status, and we cannot assure you that the IRS, or a court, will agree with any determination we make.

If we are a PFIC for any taxable year during which a United States Holder (as defined in “Item 10. Additional Information-E. Taxation-United States Federal Income Tax Considerations”) hold our ADSs or ordinary shares, such U.S. Holder may be subject to certain adverse United States federal income tax consequences. For example, if we are or become a PFIC, a United States Holder may become subject to increased tax liabilities under United States federal income tax laws and regulations, and will become subject to burdensome reporting requirements. See “Item 10. Additional Information-E. Taxation-United States Federal Income Tax Considerations-Passive Foreign Investment Company.” There can be no assurance that we will not be a PFIC for the current or any future taxable year.

​

ITEM 4.INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY

We are a Cayman Islands holding company. We have conducted our operations principally through our PRC operating subsidiaries. On January 19, 2013, Mr. Nangeng Zhang, our chairman and chief executive officer, and his team, shipped the world’s first batch of mining machines incorporating ASIC technology to consumers in Bitcoin’s history under the brand name, Avalon. Later, in order to continue the developing of mining machines of Avalon brand, which was subsequently renamed AvalonMiner brand, Beijing Canaan Creative Information Technology Co., Ltd. was incorporated and was subsequently renamed Hangzhou Canaan Intelligence Information Technology Co., Ltd., or Hangzhou Canaan, in September 2015. Empowered by the academic training and technical expertise of our co-founders, we have focused on the design of high performance, repeated computing ICs since our inception. As we further developed, Hangzhou Canaan went through a series of capital injections and became a holding company for our PRC operating subsidiaries.

With the growth of our business and in order to facilitate international capital investment in us, we underwent an offshore reorganization in the first quarter of 2018. In February 2018, Canaan Cayman Holdings Ltd. was incorporated under the laws of the Cayman Islands as an exempted company with limited liability. It was later renamed Canaan Inc. in April 2018. In March 2018, in order to mirror the shareholding structure of the then shareholders of Hangzhou Canaan, we issued and allotted our ordinary shares at par value to investment holding companies held by the then shareholders of Hangzhou Canaan. Further, an intermediate holding company, Canaan Creative (HK) Holdings Limited, or Canaan HK, our wholly- owned subsidiary, was also established in Hong Kong in February 2018. In March 2018, Canaan HK acquired a 100% equity interest in Hangzhou Canaan and Canaan Inc. became our ultimate holding company. In June 2018, we completed a one-for-2,000 shares subdivision, and the number of total issued and outstanding ordinary shares became 2,000,000,000. Accordingly, our authorized share capital of US$50,000 is divided into 1,000,000,000,000 ordinary shares of US$0.00000005 each.

On November 21, 2019, we consummated our initial public offering (the “IPO”) on the Nasdaq Global Market, where 10,000,000 American Depositary Shares (“ADSs”) were issued at the price of US$9.00 per ADS for a total gross proceeds of US$90 million. Each ADS represents 15 Class A ordinary shares.

Since our IPO, as part of our efforts to expand our business globally, we have gradually established our subsidiaries in Hong Kong and Singapore.

48

Table of Contents

On April 8, 2022, the Company entered into an at the market offering agreement (as amended by the Amendment No. 1 to ATM Agreement dated as of November 23, 2022 and as may be further amended, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time, the “ATM Agreement”), with H.C. Wainwright & Co., LLC, acting as our sole sales agent (the “Sales Agent”), relating to the sale of ADSs, each representing 15 Class A ordinary shares, par value of $0.00000005 per share, offered pursuant to the prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus to the registration statement on Form F-3 (File No. 333- 255470) (such offering, the “ATM Offering”, or “At The Market Offering”). In accordance with the terms of the ATM Agreement, we may offer and sell ADSs having an aggregate offering price of up to $750,000,000 from time to time through the Sales Agent under such prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus. As of December 31, 2022, we have not yet sold any ADSs pursuant to the ATM Offering.

We have no obligation to sell any ADSs pursuant to the ATM Agreement and may at any time suspend sales pursuant to the ATM Agreement. The principal executive offices of our main operations are located at 28 Ayer Rajah Crescent #06-08, S139959, Singapore. Our telephone number at this address is +65 6305 6618. Our registered office in the Cayman Islands is located at the offices of Sertus Chambers, Suite #5-204, 23 Lime Tree Bay Avenue, P.O. Box 2547, Grand Cayman, KY1-1104, Cayman Islands. Investors should submit any inquiries to the address and telephone number of our principal executive offices set forth above.

SEC maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC on www.sec.gov. You can also find such information on our website https://investor.canaan-creative.com.

We provide supercomputing solutions through our proprietary high performance computing ASICs. We have strong ASIC chip design capability underpinned by over ten years of industry experience and expertise of our founders and management team. We are one of the few fabless IC design companies with the advanced technology to independently design ASIC, established access to leading wafer foundry capacity and proven in-house capability to produce Bitcoin mining machines. We primarily dedicated technology and expertise in ASIC applications to Bitcoin mining machines and are a leading producer of Bitcoin mining machines in the global market. In addition, with our technology expertise and know-how in ASIC chip design, we strive to expand into AI fields and provide holistic AI solutions to our customers. Our PRC operating subsidiaries have delivered commercial edge computing AI chips based on Risc-V architecture and self-developed neural-network accelerator with outstanding performance. We believe our extensive experience and expertise in ASIC applications position us well in our future endeavors.

Leveraging our deep understanding of the cryptocurrency industry and strong technology as applied to ASIC chip design, we intend to capture the growth opportunity along the value chain of the cryptocurrency industry to enhance our offerings and achieve a more stable financial performance. We have started with the Bitcoin mining business through our strategic collaboration with certain cryptocurrency mining farms and aim to develop the Bitcoin mining business as the second engine to capitalize on the Bitcoin ecosystem and synergize with our bitcoin mining machines sales. We endeavor to grow our deployed computing power for mining and improve the energized hash rate to enhance our mining business. For the year ended December 31, 2020, 2021 and 2022, we generated revenue of nil, RMB21.7 million and RMB218.6 million (US$31.7 million) from the Bitcoin mining business, respectively.

We have developed competitive advantages in our business and technological capabilities, including the following:

49

Table of Contents

Our Business Model

We are a fabless IC designer engaged in the front-end and back-end of IC design, which are the major components of the IC product development chain. We currently dedicate our technology and expertise in ASIC chip design to Bitcoin mining machines and AI applications. We, through our PRC operating subsidiaries, independently design and develop our products in-house, including the design of proprietary ASIC chips for our Bitcoin mining machines. Front-end IC design and back-end IC design are the key parts of the IC design process. We determine the parameters of the IC chip, establish the basic logic of the design, map out the initial plan for the physical layout, and conduct back-end verification on the design. We then work closely with industry-leading third-party suppliers to fabricate, test and package the IC products we design. Moreover, we have established in-house production capabilities to assemble both Bitcoin mining machines and AI chips. We assemble our Bitcoin mining machines primarily at our assembly plant located in the PRC by integrating the ICs produced by us and related components we procure. We believe our outstanding technical expertise and production experience in IC development chain enables us to continuously introduce ICs with higher performance and power efficiency for application in both the blockchain and AI fields. In addition, we have started with the Bitcoin mining business through our strategic collaboration with certain cryptocurrency mining farms and aim to develop the Bitcoin mining business as the second engine to capitalize on the Bitcoin ecosystem and synergize with our Bitcoin mining machines sales. As we endeavor to grow our deployed computing power for mining and improve the energized hash rate to enhance our mining business, we believe that such business will play a more significant role in supplementing our Bitcoin mining machines sales, mitigate our inventory risks and contribute to our financial and operating results.

50

Table of Contents

Our Products

Bitcoin Mining Machines

Our technology and expertise in ASIC applications are primarily dedicated to the design, development, production and sales of our proprietary ASIC-based Bitcoin mining machines under the AvalonMiner brand. We, through our operating subsidiaries, offer a single line of Bitcoin mining machines, under the AvalonMiner brand to customers in the United States, Indonesia, Malaysia, Australia and other countries across the globe. Our AvalonMiner Bitcoin mining machines feature our proprietary ASICs, and the ASICs are integrated with other components we procured, including a circuit board, PMU boards, a cooling fan, heat sensors, and enclosed with an aluminum casing. Historically, we introduced new series of Bitcoin mining machines almost every year incorporating the latest technological development in terms of ASIC design and process technology. We, through our operating subsidiaries, also sell Bitcoin mining machine parts and accessories, mainly battery packs that our customers, especially our overseas customers, purchase along with Bitcoin mining machines.

Set forth below are certain specifications of our selected AvalonMiner products.

​

Leveraging our deep understanding of the cryptocurrency industry and strong technology as applied to ASIC chip design, we have started with the Bitcoin mining business through our strategic collaboration with certain cryptocurrency mining farms and aim to develop the Bitcoin mining business as the second engine to capitalize on the Bitcoin ecosystem and synergize with our bitcoin mining machines sales. Along with the deployment of our Bitcoin mining machines into our Bitcoin mining business, as of December 31, 2022, the net carrying value of mining equipment located in Central Asia and United States was RMB523.2 million, collectively.

ASICs for AI Applications

We, through our PRC operating subsidiaries, began to develop ASICs for AI applications since 2016 and completed the tape-out of our AI chips in June 2018. Our AI chips are miniaturized chips characterized by high-performance and low energy consumption. Each AI chip is designed with an artificial neural-network and high-performance processors, which mainly provides heterogeneous, real-time and off-line AI applications. We, through our PRC operating subsidiaries, have delivered commercial edge computing AI chips based on Risc-V architecture and self-developed neural- network accelerator with outstanding performance. Through the development of various generations of ASICs for Bitcoin mining, we have accumulated significant experience in reducing the size and increasing the power efficiency of the ASICs while achieving high computing power.

51

Table of Contents

Set forth below is a summary of the milestones and status of the development of our AI products.

​

Our AI chips empower our clients to provide AI solutions in the field of IoT through its machine vision and machine hearing capabilities. These capabilities have the potential to be applied in a number of AI solutions in the field of IoT that involve automation, image and voice recognition, motion control and authentication. Our AI chips can also be used for the several applications. For example, image and voice recognition can be used as an authentication method for devices, such as AI-powered face unlock for smart door-locks, and commercial transactions, such as smart entrances.

To enhance the robustness of our AI development ecosystem and ultimately to provide better user experiences, we offer comprehensive developer support to facilitate the development of AI applications. We, through our PRC operating subsidiaries, have also actively explored collaboration with business partners and have integrated our AI chips in different IoT vertical markets, such as smart locks and smart meters.

Sales and Marketing

We, through our operating subsidiaries, conduct the marketing of our Bitcoin mining machines mainly through word of mouth, press releases of our product launches and exhibitions when we launch a new product. Certain of our available products are also advertised on our website, which is updated periodically. From time to time, we, through our operating subsidiaries, maintain a presence on social media in order to raise awareness of our brand. In the first half of 2022, we, through our operating subsidiaries, launched an online store mainly targeting retail customers from overseas markets.

We have assembled a dedicated team of marketing personnel and software engineers to focus on the development and marketing of our AI products. To generate interest from our customers, we actively promote our latest research and development achievements and display our sample products. We are also in the process of working with a number of industry participants to further explore their interest in our AI products.

Our Customer Base

Historically, a substantial portion of our revenues were generated from the sales to customers located in the PRC. Because of the adverse changes in the PRC regulatory environment, we have been actively exploring the international markets outside the PRC and began to generate more sales from customers outside the PRC in 2021 and 2022. We generated 16.0%, 64.4% and 97.2% of our total revenues generated from sales of Bitcoin mining machines and related parts and from sales to customers outside the PRC, in 2020, 2021 and 2022, respectively.

Bitcoin Mining Machines

We, though our operating subsidiaries, generally sell our Bitcoin mining machines and related products to individual or corporate customers on a first-pay-first-serve basis, though we prioritize certain customers that we believe have stronger potential for a longer-term relationship. Our operating subsidiaries generally do not enter into long-term agreements with our mining machine customers. Sales are typically made on one-off sales contract or purchase order bases. All of our mining machines are distributed through direct sales. Nevertheless, our operating subsidiaries do not restrict resales of our mining machine products by our customers. Except for situations where our Bitcoin mining products have major defects upon delivery, our customers cannot return or exchange their purchases for upgrades, even in the event that their old Bitcoin mining products may no longer be economical for Bitcoin mining purpose.

52

Table of Contents

Historically, a significant portion of our Bitcoin mining machines were sold to customers located in the PRC. To hedge against the adverse changes of the regulatory environment in the PRC, we have been actively exploring the international markets outside the PRC and the revenue contribution from customers outside the PRC, such as customers in the Southeast Asia, the United States, Australia and Central Asia, accounted for 97.2% of our total revenues generated from sales of Bitcoin mining machines and related parts in 2022.

AI Applications

Our AI applications are primarily sold to companies in the IoT industry. We plan to increase our sales and marketing efforts to cover major customer groups in the IoT field. While our current distribution method is to sell our AI ASICs directly to AI product developers, we plan to also sell our products through distributors in the future.

Research and Development

We became a global pioneer in offering ASIC solutions for blockchain computation purposes as a result of the work done by our research and development team led by Mr. Nangeng Zhang, our chairman and chief executive officer. Mr. Zhang and his team invested one of the first cryptocurrency mining machines incorporating ASIC technology.

To implement our research and development roadmap and our plan to diversify our product offering, members of our research and development team are primarily organized under two focus groups, including (i) a high power-efficiency computing group consisting of 130 team members, which is responsible for chip design and optimization and (ii) an AI products group consisting of 162 team members, which are responsible for the design of our Kendryte series including algorithm optimization and end application, both as of December 31, 2022.

As of December 31, 2022, our research and development team is comprised of 292 members, representing approximately 54.0% of our total employees. Our research and development team includes 157 members with a master’s degree or above. In addition, Mr. Zhang, as our chairman and chief executive officer, leads our research and development efforts and has extensive experience in the industry. The members of our research and development team have relevant educational backgrounds, including undergraduate and advanced degrees in computational science and design and other relevant fields, and many are fluent in multiple coding languages. Many of our research and development personnel have gained relevant design and engineering experiences at other leading IC design houses.

We believe we are one of the few companies in the world to possess advanced technological know-how for ASIC design, including algorithm development and optimization, standard cell design and optimization, low voltage and high power efficiency operations, design of high performance system and heat dissipation technology. We, through our PRC operating subsidiaries, are devoted to in-house research and development of core advanced technologies, such as energy-efficient computing. As it requires a substantial amount of time and production engineering experience to integrate the results of research and development and master the core technologies in the ASICs field, we have created high barriers to entry against our competitors.

Research and Development Achievements

Our research and development efforts have yielded significant results that enable us to establish our brand recognition and our competitive position. Some of our research and development results are protected by copyrights and patents while the rest are part of our proprietary trade secrets. As of December 31, 2022, we, through our subsidiaries, have registered 192 patents in the PRC, 2 patents in Hong Kong, 9 patents in the United States, 1 patent in the Eurasian Patent Organization and 4 patents in Australia. The total of 205 patents includes 57 inventions, 112 utility model patents and 36 exterior design patents. We have also, through our PRC subsidiaries, registered 117 software copyrights and 71 IC layout-design rights in the PRC, as of December 31, 2022.

53

Table of Contents

Research and Development Roadmap

The core strength of our capabilities consists of designing products with high computing power and high energy efficiency. We aspire to develop advanced IC designs for supercomputing hardware and innovative applications. We follow a market-oriented research and development approach, and we focus on research and development projects that have a relatively clear path toward market acceptance and commercialization opportunities.

Production

Our Fabless Model

We do not directly manufacture ICs used for our products. Instead, we utilize what is known as a fabless model, whereby we, through our operating subsidiaries, cooperate with world-class production partners for all phases of the manufacturing process of our ICs, including wafer fabrication and packaging and testing. Under the fabless model, we are able to leverage the expertise of industry leaders that are certified by the ISO in such areas as fabrication, assembly, quality control and assurance, reliability and testing. In addition, the fabless model allows us to avoid many of the significant costs and risks associated with owning and operating various fabrication and packaging and testing facilities. Our fabrication partners are responsible for procurement of the majority of the raw materials used in the production of our ICs. As a result, we can focus our resources on research and development, product design and additional quality assurances.

We, through our operating subsidiaries, partner with leading global production partners. Considering the chip capacity shortage and supply chain restrictions that the semiconductor market has encountered, our operating subsidiaries maintain our cooperation with more than one production partners and suppliers in order to diversify our supply base and reduce supplier centralization risk. Our research and development team has been working to improve our chip designs to be compatible with chip node of different sizes and different manufacturing environments.

IC Fabrication

We, mainly through our operating subsidiaries, partner with three leading third-party foundry partners for IC fabrication. We generally enter into a three-year framework agreement with such third-party foundry partners to ascertain their production resource that can be allocated to us before we place an order according to our business need. Once an order is placed and accepted, we are generally required to prepay 50% of the purchase price in order to secure production capacity. The wafers are delivered in an average of approximately four months from the time when an order is placed.

Packaging and Testing

We, through our operating subsidiaries, work with leading packaging and testing partners. According to our agreements, we provide rolling forecasts and firm orders for our packaging and testing partners to purchase necessary materials. Our operating subsidiaries typically settle with our packaging and testing partners on a monthly basis and are required to pay them within 30 days upon receipt of invoices.

Assembly Plant

We have in-house capabilities to produce our products at our assembly plant located in the PRC with a total gross floor area of 7,378 square meters. Also, leveraging our Singapore headquarters, we have diversified our supply chain by adding production and logistic resources in Southeast Asia in the second quarter of 2022. Subject to the amount of ICs obtained from our production partners, we have the flexibility to adjust the production capacity of our Bitcoin mining machines. For example, we can adjust the assembly worker’s shifts in response to the purchase orders we receive.

Quality Control

We emphasize quality control in all aspects of our operations. From product development, component sourcing to product assembly and delivery, we strictly control the quality of our products and components, to ensure our Bitcoin mining machines meet our stringent internal standards as well as international and industry standards. We also require our fabrication, packaging and testing service providers to apply their stringent quality control standards. In particular, our operating subsidiaries have attained the CE certification and U.S. Federal Communication Commission certification for some of our AvalonMiner products.

54

Table of Contents

We, through our PRC operating subsidiaries, have implemented various quality-control checks into our production process and the IC fabrication process by our production partners. In addition, we provide timely and effective after-sales services and support to our users.

We, through our PRC operating subsidiaries, devote significant resources to quality control of our products with a dedicated team located in Beijing.

Warranty and After Sales Services

We, through our operating subsidiaries, provide warranties of 360 days, which we believe is in line with prevailing industry practice. Our warranties cover regular maintenance services and parts and labor for repairs. The components used in our products are typically covered by warranties provided by the respective suppliers.

We, through our operating subsidiaries, have devised a standard operating procedure for customer service. By the end of year 2022, we have expanded our service capabilities with over ten aftersales service stations worldwide. We, through our operating subsidiaries, collect and record customer feedback and complaints from different channels and make timely responses in order to achieve customer satisfaction.

We, through our operating subsidiaries, accept exchanges of our Bitcoin mining machines only for major defects. None of our operating subsidiaries has received any requests for exchange which, individually or in aggregate, has had a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition. In addition, as of the date of this annual report, none of our operating subsidiaries has experienced any product recall that adversely impacted our reputation, business operations or financial condition.

Competition

Cryptocurrency mining machines comprise the overwhelming majority of blockchain hardware. The global Bitcoin mining machine market is relatively concentrated with a few large players. Most of the leading players are based in the PRC.

Our competitors include many well-known domestic and international players. We expect that competition in the Bitcoin mining industry will continue to be intense as we compete not only with existing players that have been focused on Bitcoin mining, but also new entrants that include well- established players in the semiconductor industry, and players who were not predisposed to this industry in the past. As more people invest in Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies, more semiconductor industry players are trying to design chips for Bitcoin mining. With our years of experience designing and producing ASIC chips and mining machines, we have built up competitive strengths that have enabled us to navigate the volatility of the Bitcoin prices and demand. We expect to face competition from existing and new players that are more established than us. Some of these competitors may also have stronger brand names, greater access to capital, longer histories, longer relationships with their suppliers or customers and more resources than we do.

Intellectual Property

We consider our patents, IC layout and design rights, copyrights, trademarks, domain names, know-how, proprietary technologies and similar intellectual property critical to our success, and we rely on a combination of protections provided by patents, IC layout design rights, copyrights, trademark and trade secret law and confidentiality agreements, non-compete agreements and nondisclosure agreement with our employees and others to protect our proprietary rights. As of December 31, 2022, we, through our operating subsidiaries, had registered 380 trademarks, including 93 in the PRC, 56 in Hong Kong, 16 in Taiwan, 20 in Japan, 18 in Republic of Korea, 13 in the United States, 28 in Russia, 35 in Central Asia, 17 in the Kingdom of Norway, 21 in European Union,28 in Republic of Singapore, 17 in Iceland, 12 in the United Kingdom and 6 in Mexico.

As of December 31, 2022, we, through our subsidiaries, have registered 192 patents in the PRC, 2 patents in Hong Kong, 9 patents in the United States, 1 patent in the Eurasian Patent Organization and 4 patents in Australia. The total of 205 patents includes 57 inventions, 112 utility model patents and 36 exterior design patents. We have also, through our PRC subsidiaries, registered 117 software copyrights and 71 IC layout-design rights in the PRC, as of December 31, 2022.

Proprietary know-how that is not patentable and proprietary technologies and processes for which patents, IC layout design rights and copyrights are difficult to enforce are also of significant importance to our operations. We rely on trade secret protection and confidentiality agreements to safeguard our interests in this respect. Certain elements in our operations are not covered by patents, IC layout design rights or copyrights. Our operating subsidiaries have taken security measures to protect these elements.

55

Table of Contents

Despite our efforts to protect our proprietary rights, unauthorized parties may attempt to copy or otherwise obtain and use our technology. Monitoring unauthorized use of our technology is difficult and costly, and we cannot be certain that the steps our operating subsidiaries have taken will prevent misappropriation of our technology. From time to time, we, through our operating subsidiaries, may have to resort to litigation to enforce our intellectual property rights, which could result in substantial costs and diversion of our resources.

We, through our operating subsidiaries, have in the past entered, and may in the future continue to, enter into IP licensing agreements with third parties for the use of their proprietary technologies, primarily software development tools, in the development of our products. Third parties may initiate litigation against us alleging infringement of their proprietary rights or breach of a licensing agreement or declaring their non-infringement of our intellectual property rights. In the event of a successful claim of infringement or breach of a licensing agreement and our failure or inability to develop non-infringing technology or license the infringed or similar technology or cure the breach on a timely basis, our business could be harmed. Moreover, even if we are able to license the infringed or similar technology, license fees could be substantial and may adversely affect our results of operations.

Insurance

Our operating subsidiaries do not maintain business liability or interruption insurance, which, based on publicly available information available to us relating to IC design companies, is in line with customary industry practice. Any uninsured occurrence of business disruption, litigation or natural disaster, or significant damages to our uninsured equipment or facilities could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

Employees

As of December 31, 2022, we and our operating subsidiaries employed a total of 541 employees that are classified as follows:

​

We operate in a highly competitive and fast-growing industry in which recruiting and retaining talent is crucial to our continued growth and profitability. We compensate our employees based on historical contributions, potential for further contributions, as well as the market rate for qualified talent. We are committed to attracting and retaining top talent in the industry, and our emolument policy reflects that commitment. We offer various incentives to our employees including performance-based bonuses and share-based compensation. We also provide accidental insurance for the benefit of our employees. Pursuant to local regulations in each of the regions where we operate, we make contributions to various employee benefit plans. Employee benefits covered by these arrangements include employee benefits required by PRC laws and regulations as well as incentives for increasing production quantity, accommodations, meals and travel allowances. We believe that maintaining a stable and motivated workforce is critical to the success of our business. As a fast-growing company, we believe we are able to provide our employees with ample career development choices and advancement opportunities. We, through our operation subsidiaries, organize and launch various training programs on a regular basis for our employees. We believe that the current emolument policy has contributed to our ability to attract, incentivize and retain talents in such a competitive and fast- growing industry.

Properties

Our PRC operating subsidiaries lease all our properties in China in connection with our business operations. They mainly include premises for our assembly plants, warehouses and offices. As of December 31, 2022, we and our operating subsidiaries occupied a total of 15 properties with an aggregate gross floor area of approximately 19,731 square meters.

56

Table of Contents

Environmental Matters

Our operating subsidiaries are subject to environmental laws and regulations in the jurisdictions where they operates. These laws and regulations govern a broad range of environmental matters, including air pollution, noise emissions and water and waste discharge. We consider the protection of the environment to be important and have implemented measures in the operation of our business to ensure our compliance with all material applicable requirements under relevant environmental laws and regulations. Due to the nature of our operations, the waste we produce is not hazardous and has minimal impact on the environment.

The operations of our operating subsidiaries are subject to regulation and periodic monitoring by local environmental authorities. If we fail to comply with present or future laws and regulations, we could be subject to fines, suspension of production or cessation of operations.

Legal Proceedings

On March 4, 2020, a putative class action was filed in the United States District Court of Oregon against us, certain of our officers and directors and the underwriters in our IPO. The complaint alleges that our registration statement on Form F-1, initially filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 28, 2019 (File No. 333-234356), contained material misstatements and omissions in violation of federal securities laws. On March 6, 2020, another putative class action, making substantially similar allegations, was filed in New York County Supreme Court (the “State Action”) against us and certain of our officers and directors. On June 1, 2020, we filed a motion to stay all proceedings in the State Action pending adjudication of the Federal Action, which was granted on July 21, 2020. Subsequently, the Federal Action was transferred to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (the “Court”) on September 2, 2020. On October 7, 2020, lead plaintiffs in the Federal Action filed an amended complaint asserting claims under Section 11 of the Securities Act and Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act for that the registration statement failed to disclose three alleged related party transactions. On December 7, 2020, we filed a motion to dismiss in the Federal Action and our motion to dismiss the amended complaint in the Federal Action. On July 8, 2021, the Court dismissed the first amended complaint but allowed plaintiffs to file a second amended complaint by August 6, 2021. On August 6, 2021, plaintiffs filed a letter motion for leave to file a second amended complaint. On August 27, 2021, we filed a letter response to oppose plaintiffs’ August 6, 2021 letter motion and to seek a final judgment dismissing the Federal Action to be entered. On March 31, 2022, the Court denied plaintiffs’ motion for leave to file a second amended complaint as futile and dismissed Plaintiffs’ claims with prejudice. Plaintiffs did not appeal. Following dismissal with prejudice of the Federal Action, plaintiff voluntarily discontinued the State Action with prejudice on June 2, 2022.

On April 15, 2021, a new putative class action was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York against us and certain of our officers and directors. The complaint alleges that our statements in February 2021 about increased visibility into revenue and the size and quality of orders we were receiving were materially false and misleading. Plaintiff claims that the truth about our revenue was revealed in April 2021, when we announced our latest financial results. On December 9, 2021, the Court appointed Bill Lu and Liying Huang as lead plaintiffs and Brager Eagle & Squire, P.C. as lead plaintiffs’ counsel. On February 7, 2022, lead plaintiffs filed an amended complaint asserting the same claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act against the same set of defendants. The amended complaint alleges our November 30, 2020 and February 10, 2021 press releases and the April 9, 2021 interview of our chief executive officer in an article published by Decrypt contained were false and misleading statements regarding the pre-sale orders we had received and our ability to secure sufficient chip supply to meet the increasing demand for mining machines, because those statements allegedly left “investors with the false impression that revenue in the fourth quarter 2020 would be solid” and allegedly omitted that the pre-sale orders were locked in at lower prices than the re-bounding Bitcoin market prices during the third quarter of 2019 and fourth quarter of 2020, and we had been experiencing significant supply chain disruptions during the fourth quarter of 2020. On April 8, 2022, we filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint , which has been fully briefed as of July 7, 2022. As of the date of this annual report, the Court issued an order granting our motion to dismiss the case in its entirety. The Court granted lead plaintiffs leave to further amend their amended complaint, the deadline of which is April 26, 2023.Other than the above, we and our subsidiaries are currently not a party to, and we are not aware of any threat of, any legal, arbitral or administrative proceedings, which, in our opinion, is likely to have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial conditions or results of operations. We may from time to time become a party to various legal, arbitral or administrative proceedings arising in the ordinary course of our business.

Regulations in the PRC

This section summarizes the principal current PRC laws and regulations relevant to the business and operations of our PRC operating subsidiaries.

57

Table of Contents

This section sets forth a summary of the applicable PRC laws, rules, regulations, government and industry policies and requirements that have a significant impact on the operations and business of our PRC operating subsidiaries. This summary does not purport to be a complete description of all the laws and regulations, which apply to the business and operations of our PRC operating subsidiaries. Investors should note that the following summary is based on relevant laws and regulations in force as of the date of this annual report, which may be subject to change.

PRC Policies and Regulations relating to the IC Industries

Investments in the PRC conducted by foreign investors and foreign-owned enterprises shall comply with the Catalog of Industries for Encouraged Foreign Investment (2022 Edition) (《鼓励外商投资产业目录(2022修订)》), or the Foreign Investment Catalog, which was jointly promulgated by the Ministry of Commerce of the PRC, or MOFCOM, and the NDRC, on October 26, 2022 and became effective on January 1, 2023. The Foreign Investment Catalog contains specific provisions guiding market access of foreign capital, stipulating in detail different areas of entry, which include encouraged foreign-invested industries. Our business falls within the category of encouraged foreign-invested industries, according to catalogs 330, 331, 335, 336, 339 and 340 of encouraged foreign invested industries listed in the Foreign Investment Catalog.

Pursuant to the Provisions for Guiding the Foreign Investment Direction (《指导外商投资方向规定》), projects with foreign investment fall into 4 categories, namely encouraged, permitted, restricted and prohibited. Projects with foreign investment that are encouraged, restricted or prohibited shall be listed in the Foreign Investment Catalog. Projects with foreign investment not listed as encouraged, restricted or prohibited projects are permitted projects.

As demonstrated by the Circular of the State Council on Printing and Distributing Policies for Encouraging the Development of the Software Industry and the Integrated Circuit Industry (《国务院关于印发鼓励软件产业和集成电路产业发展若干政策的通知》 ) issued on June 24, 2000, the PRC continues to enact policies encouraging new and advanced technology and supporting the software and IC industries.

Pursuant to the Circular of the State Council on Printing and Distributing Policies for Further Encouraging the Development of the Software Industry and the Integrated Circuit Industry (《国务院关于印发进一步鼓励软件产业和集成电路产业发展若干政策的通知》 ) effective from January 28, 2011 and the Announcement of the State Administration of Taxation on Issues Concerning the Accreditation and the Administration for Software and Integrated Circuit Enterprises (《关于软件和集成电路企业认定管理有关问题的公告》 ) effective from May 30, 2012 (abolished on May 29, 2016), the following financial and tax policies were formulated:

58

Table of Contents

As demonstrated by the Circular of the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Education, the Ministry of Finance, the Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security, the Ministry of Commerce, the State Taxation Administration, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the National Bureau of Statistics, the Chinese Academy of Engineering, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission and the China National Intellectual Property Administration on Issuing the Special Action Plan for Enhancing Design Capacity in the Manufacturing Industry (2019-2022) (《工业和信息化部、国家发展和改革委员会、教育部、财政部、人力资源和社会保障部、商务部、国家税务总局、国家市场监督管理总局、国家统计局、中国工程院、中国银行保险监督管理委员会、中国证券监督管理委员会、国家知识产权局关于印发制造业设计能力提升专项行动计划（2019－2022年）的通知》) issued on October 11, 2019, the integrated circuit design industry will be vigorously developed in the recent years as realizing the design upgrading of traditional advantageous industries.

Pursuant to the Circular of the State Council on Issuing Several Policies for Promoting the High-quality Development of the Integrated Circuit Industry and the Software Industry in the New Era (《国务院关于印发新时期促进集成电路产业和软件产业高质量发展若干政策的通知》) issued on July 27, 2020, the integrated circuit industry and software industry are considered as the core of information industry. The integrated circuit industry has received strong support from eight aspects such as finance and taxation, investment and financing, research and development, import and export, intellectual property rights and market application, etc.

PRC Policies and Regulations relating to the Bitcoin Industry

The policies and regulations relating to the Bitcoin industry do not have a direct impact on the Company. However, they could have an impact on the Company’s customers in the PRC, which could indirectly impact the demand for the Company’s Bitcoin mining machines.

According to the Circular of the People’s Bank of China, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, China Banking Regulatory Commission, China Securities Regulatory Commission, and China Insurance Regulatory Commission on the Prevention of Risks from Bitcoin (《中国人民银行、工业和信息化部、中国银行业监督管理委员会、中国证券监督管理委员会、中国保险监督管理委员会关于防范比特币风险的通知》 ) jointly promulgated by People’s Bank of China, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, China Banking Regulatory Commission, China Securities Regulatory Commission, or CSRC, and China Insurance Regulatory Commission on December 3, 2013, or the Circular, Bitcoin shall be a kind of virtual commodity in nature, which shall not be in the same legal status with currencies and shall not be circulated as currencies and used in markets as currencies. The Circular also provides that financial institutions and payment institutions shall not engage in business in connection with Bitcoin.

According to Announcement of the People’s Bank of China, the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the State Administration for Industry and Commerce, the China Banking Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission and the China Insurance Regulatory Commission on Preventing Initial Coin Offerings (ICO) Risks (《中国人民银行、中央网信办、工业和信息化部、工商总局、银监会、证监会、保监会关于防范代币发行融资风险的公告》 ) promulgated by seven PRC governmental authorities including the People’s Bank of China on September 4, 2017, or the Announcement, activities of offering and financing of tokens, including initial coin offerings, have been forbidden in the PRC since they may be suspected to be considered as illegal offering of securities or illegal fundraising. All so-called token trading platform should not (i) engage in the exchange between any statutory currency with tokens and “virtual currencies,” (ii) trade or trade the tokens or “virtual currencies” as central counterparties, or (iii) provide pricing, information agency or other services for tokens or “virtual currencies.” The Announcement further provides that financial institutions and payment institutions shall not engage in business in connection with transactions of offering and financing of tokens.

According to the Circular on Regulating Virtual Currency “Mining” Activities (《关于整治虚拟货币“挖矿”活动的通知》) jointly promulgated by the National Development and Reform Commission of the PRC, the Publicity Department of the CPC Central Committee, the Office of Cyberspace Affairs Commission of the CPC Central Committee, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the Ministry of Finance, the People’s Bank of China, the State Administration of Taxation, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission and the National Energy Administration on September 3, 2021, the PRC government classifies the virtual currency mining activities as the eliminated industry.

59

Table of Contents

According to the Circular on Further Preventing and Disposing of Virtual Currency Trading Speculation Risks (《关于进一步防范和处置虚拟货币交易炒作风险的通知》) jointly promulgated by the People’s Bank of China, the Office of Cyberspace Affairs Commission of the CPC Central Committee, the Supreme People’s Court, the Supreme People’s Procuratorate, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the PRC Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, CSRC and the State Administration of Foreign Exchange on September 15, 2021, virtual currency- related business activities, such as exchange between legal tender currencies and virtual currencies, exchange between virtual currencies, trading virtual currencies as central counterparty, providing information intermediary and pricing services for virtual currency trading, token issuance and financing, and virtual currency derivatives trading are illegal financial activities and are strictly prohibited and resolutely banned. Virtual currency- related business activities of an overseas virtual currency exchange which provides services to PRC residents via the Internet are illegal financial activities.

On March 12, 2022, the National Development and Reform Commission of the PRC published the Market Access Negative List (2022 Edition) (《市场准入负面清单(2022年版)》), which lists the virtual currency mining activities as the “backward production processes and equipment” under the eliminated item in the Catalogue for Guiding Industrial Restructuring (《产业结构调整指导目录》). According to the List, market entities are prohibited from investing in eliminated items. The above regulations and policies may result in no customers in the PRC buying our products.

PRC Laws and Regulations relating to Intellectual Property Rights Trademark

The Trademark Law of the PRC (《中华人民共和国商标法》) was promulgated on August 23, 1982 with the last amendment effective from November 1, 2019. The Implementing Regulations of the Trademark Law of the PRC (《中华人民共和国商标法实施条例》) was promulgated on August 3, 2002 by the State Council and amended on April 29, 2014 and became effective on May 1, 2014. These current effective laws and regulations provide the basic legal framework for the regulations of trademarks in the PRC, covering registered trademarks including commodity trademarks, service trademarks, collective marks and certificate marks. The Trademark Office under the CNIPA is responsible for the registration and administration of trademarks in the PRC. Trademarks are granted on a term of 10 years commencing on its registration date. Twelve months prior to the expiration of the 10-year term, an application may renew the trademark for another 10 years.

Under the Trademark Law, any of the following acts may be regarded as an infringement of the exclusive right to use a registered trademark:

Violation of the Trademark Law may result in imposition of fines, confiscation and destruction of infringing commodities.

Patent

Pursuant to the Patent Law of the PRC (《中华人民共和国专利法》), promulgated on March 12, 1984 with the last amendment effective from June 1, 2021, and the Detailed Implementing Rules of the Patent Law of the PRC (《中华人民共和国专利法实施细则》) promulgated on June 15, 2001 with the last amendment effective from February 1, 2010, respectively, an inventor or a designer may apply to China National Intellectual Property Administration, or the CNIPA for the grant of an invention patent, an utility model patent or a design patent. According to the Patent Law of the PRC, the right to apply for a patent (a patent application) and of registered patent can be transferred upon completion of registration with CNIPA. The patent right duration is 20 years for invention and 10 years for utility model and design, starting from the date of application. A patentee is obligated to pay annual fee beginning with the year in which the patent right is granted. Failure to pay the annual fee may result in a termination of the patent right duration.

60

Table of Contents

Copyright

The Copyright Law of the PRC (《中华人民共和国著作权法》), promulgated on September 7, 1990 with the last amendment promulgated on November 11, 2020 and to be effective on June 1, 2021, protects copyright and explicitly covers computer software copyright. The Regulations on the Computer Software Protection (《计算机软件保护条例》), promulgated on December 20, 2001 and amended on January 30, 2013 and came into force on March 1, 2013, protects the rights and interests of the computer software copyright holders and encourages the development of the software industry and information economy. In the PRC, software developed by PRC citizens, legal persons or other organizations are automatically protected immediately after its development, whether published or not. Foreigners or stateless persons having software first published within the territory of the PRC enjoy copyright in accordance with these regulations. Software owned by foreigners or stateless persons are protected in the PRC under these regulations according to an agreement signed between the country to which the foreigner belongs or the habitual residence of its developer and the PRC or according to the international conventions the PRC participated in. A software copyright owner may register with the software registration institution recognized by the copyright administration department of the State Council. A registration certificate issued by the software registration institution is a preliminary proof of the registered items. On February 20, 2002, the National Copyright Administration of the PRC promulgated the Measures for the Registration of Computer Software Copyright (《计算机软件著作权登记办法》), which came into force on the date of promulgation and outlines the operational procedures for registration of software copyright, as well as registration of software copyright licenses and transfer contracts. The copyright Protection Center of PRC is mandated as the software registration agency under the regulations.

Layout Designs of Integrated Circuits

The Regulations on the Protection of Layout-Designs of Integrated Circuits (《集成电路布图设计保护条例》) was promulgated by the State Council on April 2, 2001 and became effective on October 1, 2001, and the Detailed Implementing Rules of the Regulations on the Protection of Layout-Designs of Integrated Circuits (《集成电路布图设计保护条例实施细则》) were promulgated by CNIPA, the authority to receive and examine applications for registrations of layout IC designs, on September 18, 2001 and came into effect on October 1, 2001, or collectively the Layout-design Regulations.

Pursuant to the Layout-design Regulations, layout-design created by a PRC citizen, legal person or other organization shall be eligible for the exclusive right of layout-design in accordance with the Layout-design Regulations. The holder of the right of a layout design shall enjoy the following exclusive right:

The exclusive right of a layout-design is acquired after it is registered with the intellectual property administration department of the State Council. Any unregistered layout-design shall not be protected under the Layout-design Regulations. The term of protection of the exclusive right of a layout-design shall be 10 years starting from the date of filling for registration or from the date on which it was first commercially exploited anywhere in the world, whichever expires earlier. However, no matter whether it has been registered or commercially exploited, a layout-design shall no longer be protected under the Layout-design Regulations 15 years after the date of the completion of its creation.

Any layout-design, if no application for its registration has been filled with the intellectual property administration department of the State Council within two years from the date on which it was first commercially exploited anywhere in the world, shall no longer be registered by the intellectual property administration department of the State Council.

The following acts, without the authorization of the holder of the right of a layout-design, would constitute an infringement of the layout-design:

61

Table of Contents

The amount of compensation for the damage caused by an infringement of the exclusive right of a layout-design shall be the profits which the infringer has earned through the infringement or the losses suffered by the person whose right was infringed, including the reasonable expenses paid by the infringed person for the purposes of stopping the infringement.

Domain Name

Internet domain name registration and related matters are primarily regulated by the Administrative Measures on Internet Domain Names (《互联网域名管理办法》) issued by the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (中华人民共和国工业和信息化部), or the MIIT, on August 24, 2017 which became effective on November 1, 2017, the Measures on Domain Name Disputes Resolution (《中国互联网络信息中心域名争议解决办法》) issued by China Internet Network Information Center (中国互联网络信息中心), or the CINIC, which became effective on June 28, 2012 (abolished on November 21, 2014), and the Announcement of Issuance and Implementation on the Detailed Implementing Rules of national TLD (《关于发布并实施<国家顶级域名注册实施细则 >系列规定的公告》) issued by CINIC, which became effective on June 18, 2019. Domain name registrations are handled through domain name service agencies established under the relevant regulations, and the applicants become domain name holders upon successful registration. Domain name disputes shall be submitted to institutions authorized by the CINIC for resolution.

PRC Laws relating to Product Quality

The Product Quality Law of the PRC (《中华人民共和国产品质量法》) was promulgated on February 22, 1993 and amended on July 8, 2000, August 27, 2009 and December 29, 2018, respectively. The product quality supervision department under the State Council is responsible for nationwide product quality supervision. All the relevant departments under the State Council are in charge of product quality supervision according to their respective responsibilities. Local product quality supervision departments at or above the county level are responsible for product quality supervision within their own administrative areas.

Manufacturers and sellers shall establish and improve their internal product quality management systems and rigorously implement quality norms, quality responsibilities and corresponding measures for their assessment.

The PRC government encourages the use of scientific quality management methods and adoption of advanced science and technology, and encourages enterprises to ensure that their product quality reach or surpass trade standards, national standards and international standards. The entities and individuals that have made outstanding achievements in exercising advanced management of product quality and in bringing product quality up to the advanced international levels shall be awarded.

PRC Laws relating to Production Safety

The Work Safety Law of the PRC (《中华人民共和国安全生产法》) promulgated on June 29, 2002, with the latest amended version effective from September 1, 2021, is the principal law governing the supervision and administration of production safety in the PRC. Entities engaged in production and business activities within the territory of the PRC shall abide by the relevant legal requirements such as providing its staff with training on production safety and providing safe working environment in compliance with relevant laws and regulations. Any entities unable to provide the required safe working environment may not engage in production activities. Any failure to comply with the aforesaid provisions or to rectify noncompliance within a time limit may subject the relevant entities to fines and penalties, suspension of operations, ceasing of operations, or even criminal liability in severe situations.

PRC Laws and Regulations relating to Taxation

Enterprise Income Tax

According to the EIT Law, which was promulgated by the National People’s Congress on March 16, 2007 with the latest amended version effective from December 29, 2018, and its implementing rules, a unified EIT rate of 25% is applied equally to both domestic enterprises and foreign invested enterprises, excluding non-resident enterprises. The EIT rate could be reduced to 15% for High-tech enterprises in need of special support from the PRC government.

62

Table of Contents

Pursuant to the newly revised Administrative Measures for the Accreditation of High-tech Enterprises (《高新技术企业认定管理办法》), or the Administrative Measures, which became effective on January 1, 2016, High-tech enterprises, which are recognized in accordance with the Administrative Measures, may apply for the tax preferential policy in accordance with the EIT Law and the Implementing Measures thereof, the Law of the PRC on the Administration of Tax Collection (《中华人民共和国税收征收管理法》) and the Detailed Implementing Rules of the Law of the PRC on the Administration of Tax Collection (《中华人民共和国税收征收管理法实施细则》). The qualified high-tech enterprises would be taxed at a rate of 15% on EIT. The validity period of High-tech enterprises shall be three years from the date of issuance of the certificate of High-tech enterprise. After obtaining the High-tech enterprise qualification, such enterprise shall retain its financial statements together with details of its research and development activities and other technological innovation activities for future reference in accordance with the requirements of the tax authority and other relevant authorities. Where a significant change occurred such as change of name or other conditions related to the High-tech enterprises identified (e.g., separation, merger, restructuring and change of business), such enterprise shall report it to the relevant competent tax authority, which would accredit such enterprise within three months. Upon such accreditation, the High-tech enterprise would either remain its qualification or be disqualified. For enterprises undergoing a change of name, the authority would re-issue the certificate with the certificate number and duration of validity remains unchanged.

Pursuant to the Announcement of the State Administration of Taxation on Several Issues Concerning the Enterprise Income Taxes on the Indirect Transfer of Properties by Non-resident Enterprises (《关于非居民企业间接转让财产企业所得税若干问题的公告》 ) promulgated and with effect from February 3, 2015 and with last amendment on December 29, 2017, or Circular 7, and the Announcement of the State Administration of Taxation on Issues Concerning Withholding of Income Tax of Non-resident Enterprises at Source (《国家税务总局关于非居民企业所得税源泉扣缴有关问题的公告》 ) promulgated on October 17, 2017 with last amendment on June 15, 2018, or Circular 37, where a non-resident enterprise indirectly transfers equities and other properties of a PRC resident enterprise, or PRC Taxable Properties, to evade its obligation of paying EIT by implementing arrangements that are not for bona fide commercial purpose, such indirect transfer shall be re-identified and recognized as a direct transfer of equities and other properties of the PRC resident enterprise, in accordance with the provisions of Article 47 of the EIT Law. PRC Taxable Properties in this announcement include properties of a PRC entity or establishment located in the PRC, real estate in the PRC and an equity investment in a PRC resident enterprise, that are directly held by non-resident enterprises and proceed from such transfer shall be subject to EIT in the PRC in accordance with the PRC tax laws. An indirect transfer of PRC Taxable Properties refers to a transfer by a non-resident company of an equity interest or other similar right or interest in an overseas enterprise (excluding the PRC resident enterprise registered overseas), or the Overseas Enterprises, that in turn directly or indirectly holds the PRC Taxable Properties, which effectively has the same or a similar effect as a direct transfer of such PRC Taxable Properties. Circular 7 also provides that an indirect transfer of PRC Taxable Properties, which satisfies one of the following conditions, will not be subject to the aforesaid provisions:

Value-added Tax

Pursuant to the Interim Regulations on Value-Added Tax of the PRC (《中华人民共和国增值税暂行条例》) promulgated by the Stated Council on December 13, 1993 with the latest amended version effective from November 19, 2017, and its implementing rules (《中华人民共和国增值税暂行条例实施细则》) promulgated by MOF on December 25, 1993 and revised on December 15, 2008 and October 28, 2011, respectively, tax payers engaging in sale of goods, provision of processing services, repairs and replacement services or importation of goods within the territory of the PRC shall pay value-added tax, or the VAT. Unless stated otherwise, the rate of value-added tax is 17%. Pursuant to the Circular of Value-added Tax Policies of Software Products (《关于软件产品增值税政策的通知》), a general taxpayer who sells its self-develop software products and borne a VAT more than 3%, could enjoy a levy-refund policy on VAT after being taxed at the fixed rate of 17%.

However, in practice, such general taxpayer should present the registration certificate for software products (软件产品登记证书) or registration certificate for software copyrights (计算器软件著作权登记证书) to prove the software products were developed and produced by its own.

63

Table of Contents

In April 2018, MOF and SAT jointly promulgated the Circular of the Ministry of Finance and the State Administration of Taxation on Adjustment of Value-Added Tax Rates (《财政部、税务总局关于调整增值税税率 的通知》), which came into effect on May 1, 2018, or Circular 32, according to which (i) for VAT taxable sales or imports of goods originally subject to value-added tax rates of 17% and 11% respectively, such tax rates were adjusted to 16% and 10%, respectively; and (ii) for exported goods originally subject to a tax rate of 17% and an export tax refund rate of 17%, the export tax refund rate was adjusted to 16%. Circular 32 became effective on May 1, 2018 and superseded existing provisions which were inconsistent with Circular 32.

Pursuant to the Announcement on Relevant Policies for Deepening Value-Added Tax Reform (《关于深化增值税改革有关政策的公告》), which was promulgated by MOF, State Administration of Taxation and the General Administration of Customs on March 20, 2019 and came into effect on April 1, 2019, where (i) for VAT taxable sales or imports of goods originally subject to value-added tax rates of 16%, such tax rates shall be adjusted to 13%; (ii) for the exported goods originally subject to a tax rate of 16% and an export tax refund rate of 16%, the export tax refund rate shall be adjusted to 13%.

PRC Laws and Regulations relating to Dividend Distribution

Under the Foreign Investment Law of the People’s Republic of China (《中华人民共和国外商投资法》), which was promulgated by the National People’s Congress of the PRC on March 15, 2019 and became effective on January 1, 2020, the organization form and structure and operating rules of foreign-funded enterprises are subject to the provisions of the Company Law of the People’s Republic of China, the Partnership Enterprise Law of the People’s Republic of China and other applicable laws. According to the Company Law of the People’s Republic of China, foreign-invested enterprises in the PRC may pay dividends only out of their accumulated profits, if any, determined in accordance with PRC accounting standards and regulations. In addition, wholly foreign-owned enterprises in the PRC are also required to allocate at least 10% of their respective accumulated profits after tax each year, if any, to certain reserve funds unless these accumulated reserves have reached 50% of the registered capital of such enterprises. These reserves are not distributable as cash dividends.

According to the EIT Law and its implementing rules, dividends paid to investors of an eligible PRC resident enterprise can be exempted from EIT and dividends paid to foreign investors are subject to a withholding tax rate of 10%, unless relevant tax agreements entered into by the PRC government provide otherwise.

The PRC and the government of Hong Kong entered into the Arrangement between the Mainland of the PRC and the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with respect to Taxes on Incomes (《内地和香港特别行政区关于对所得避免双重征税和防止偷漏税的安排》), or the Arrangement, on August 21, 2006. According to the Arrangement, 5% withholding tax rate shall apply to the dividends paid by a PRC company to a Hong Kong resident, provided that such Hong Kong resident directly holds at least 25% of the equity interests in the PRC company, and 10% of withholding tax rate shall apply if the Hong Kong resident holds less than 25% of the equity interests in the PRC company.

Pursuant to the Circular on Relevant Issues Concerning the Implementation of Dividend Clauses in Tax Treaties (《关于执行税收协定股息条款有关问题的通知》), which was promulgated by the State Administration of Taxation, or SAT, and became effective on February 20, 2009, all of the following requirements shall be satisfied where a fiscal resident of the other party to a tax agreement needs to be entitled to such tax agreement treatment as being taxed at a tax rate specified in the tax agreement for the dividends paid to it by a PRC resident company: (i) such a fiscal resident who obtains dividends shall be a company as provided in the tax agreement; (ii) owner’s equity interests and voting shares of the PRC resident company directly owned by such a fiscal resident reaches a specified percentage; and (iii) the equity interests of the PRC resident company directly owned by such a fiscal resident, at any time during the 12 months prior to obtaining the dividends, reach a percentage specified in the tax agreement.

According to the Tentative Administrative Measures on Tax Convention Treatment for Non-Residents (《非居民享受税收协定待遇管理办法（试行）》), which was promulgated by the SAT on August 24, 2009 and became effective on October 1, 2009, where a non-resident enterprise that receives dividends from a PRC resident enterprise wishes to enjoy the favorable tax benefits under the tax arrangements, it shall submit an application for approval to the competent tax authority. Without being approved, the non-resident enterprise may not enjoy the favorable tax treatment provided in the tax agreements.

64

Table of Contents

However, the Tentative Administrative Measures on Tax Convention Treatment for Non-Residents (《非居民享受税收协定待遇管理办法（试行）》) has been repealed by the Administrative Measures on Tax Convention Treatment for Non-Resident Taxpayers (《非居民纳税人享受税收协定待遇管理办法》), which was promulgated by the SAT on August 27, 2015 and became effective on November 1, 2015 with last amendment on June 15, 2018, where a non-resident enterprise that receives dividends from a PRC resident enterprise, it could directly enjoy the favorable tax benefits under the tax arrangements at tax returns, and subject to the subsequent regulation of the competent tax authority.

Since January 1, 2020, the Administrative Measures on Tax Convention Treatment for Non-Resident Taxpayers (《非居民纳税人享受税收协定待遇管理办法》) has been replaced by the Announcement of the State Taxation Administration on Issuing the Administrative Measures for Entitlement to Treaty Benefits for Non-resident Taxpayers (《国家税务总局关于发布<非居民纳税人享受协定待遇管理办法>的公告》), which was promulgated on October 14, 2019, Entitlement to treaty benefits for non-resident taxpayers shall be handled by means of “self-judgment of eligibility, declaration of entitlement, and retention of relevant materials for future reference,” and non-resident taxpayers shall retain relevant information proving the status of “beneficial owner” in the case of entitlement to dividends clauses.

PRC Laws and Regulations relating to Labor

Pursuant to the PRC Labor Law (《中华人民共和国劳动法》) promulgated on July 5, 1994 and effective from January 1, 1995, and last revised on December 29, 2018, as well as the PRC Labor Contract Law (《中华人民共和国劳动合同法》) promulgated on June 29, 2007, revised on December 28, 2012 and effective from July 1, 2013, if an employment relationship is established between an entity and its employees, written labor contracts shall be executed between them. The relevant laws stipulate the maximum number of working hours per day and per week, respectively. Furthermore, the relevant laws also set forth the minimum wages. The entities shall establish and develop systems for occupational safety and sanitation, implement the rules and standards of the PRC government on occupational safety and sanitation, educate employees on occupational safety and sanitation, prevent accidents at work and reduce occupational hazards.

Pursuant to the Interim Regulations on Levying Social Insurance Premiums (《社会保险费征缴暂行条例》) promulgated on January 22, 1999 and revised on March 24, 2019, Decisions of the State Council on Modifying the Basic Endowment Insurance System for Enterprise Employees (《国务院关于完善企业职工基本养老保险制度的决定》 ) promulgated on December 3, 2005, the Decision of the State Council on Establishment of Basic Medical Insurance System for Urban Employee ( 《国务院关于建立城镇职工基本医疗保险制度的决定》) issued by State Council with effect from December 14, 1998, the Regulations on Unemployment Insurance ( 《失业保险条例》) effective from January 22, 1999, Regulations on Work-Related Injury Insurance (《工伤保险条例》) promulgated on April 27, 2003 with effect from January 1, 2004, and as amended on December 20, 2010 and effective from January 1, 2011, and the Interim Measures concerning the Maternity Insurance for Enterprise Employees (《企业职工生育保险试行办法》) promulgated on December 14, 1994 with effect from January 1, 1995, employers are required to register with the competent social insurance authorities and provide their employees with welfare schemes covering pension insurance, unemployment insurance, maternity insurance, work-related injury insurance and medical insurance.

Pursuant to the Social Insurance Law of the PRC (《中华人民共和国社会保险法》), which became effective on July 1, 2011 with last amendment on December 29, 2018, all employees are required to participate in basic pension insurance, basic medical insurance schemes and unemployment insurance, which must be contributed by both the employers and the employees. All employees are required to participate in work-related injury insurance and maternity insurance schemes, which must be contributed by the employers. Employers are required to complete registrations with local social insurance authorities. Moreover, the employers must timely make all social insurance contributions. Except for mandatory exceptions such as force majeure, social insurance premiums may not be paid late, reduced or be exempted. Where an employer fails to make social insurance contributions in full and on time, the social insurance contribution collection agencies shall order it to make all or outstanding contributions within a specified period and impose a late payment fee at the rate of 0.05% per day from the date on which the contribution becomes due. If such employer fails to make the overdue contributions within such time limit, the relevant administrative department may impose a fine equivalent to 1—3 times the overdue amount.

65

Table of Contents

Pursuant to the Administrative Regulations on the Housing Provident Fund (《住房公积金管理条例》) effective from April 3, 1999, amended on March 24, 2002 and March 24, 2019, enterprises are required to register with the competent administrative centers of housing provident fund and open bank accounts for housing provident funds for their employees. Employers are also required to timely pay all housing fund contributions for their employees. Where an employer fails to submit and deposit registration of housing provident fund or fails to go through the formalities of opening housing provident fund accounts for its employees, the housing provident fund management center shall order it to go through the formalities within a prescribed time limit. Failing to do so at the expiration of the time limit will subject the employer to a fine of not less than RMB10,000 and up to RMB50,000. When an employer fails to pay housing provident fund due in full and in time, housing provident fund center is entitled to order it to rectify, failing to do so would result in enforcement exerted by the court.

PRC Laws and Regulations relating to Foreign Exchange

Foreign Exchange

Pursuant the Administrative Regulations of the PRC on Foreign Exchange ( 《中华人民共和国外汇管理条例》) promulgated by the State Council on January 29, 1996 and amended on August 5, 2008 with effect from August 5, 2008, and various regulations issued by the State Administration of Foreign Exchange (国家外汇管理局), or the SAFE, and other PRC regulatory agencies, foreign currency could be exchanged or paid through two different accounts, namely current account and capital account. Payment of current account items, including commodity, trade and service-related foreign exchange transactions and other current payment, may be made by conversion between Renminbi and foreign currencies without approval of the SAFE, but are subject to procedural requirements including presenting relevant documentary evidence of such transactions. Capital account items, such as direct equity investment, loans and repatriation of investment, require the prior approval from or registration with the SAFE or its local branch for conversion between Renminbi and the foreign currency, and remittance of the foreign currency outside the PRC.

SAFE Circular 59

On November 19, 2012, SAFE promulgated the Circular on Further Improving and Adjusting Foreign Exchange Administration Policies on Foreign Direct Investment (《国家外汇管理局关于进一步改进和调整直接投资外汇管理政策的通知》), or SAFE Circular 59, which became effective on December 17, 2012, with last amendment on December 30, 2019. SAFE Circular 59 substantially amends and simplifies the current foreign exchange procedure. According to SAFE Circular 59, the opening of various special purpose foreign exchange accounts (e.g. pre-investment expenses account, foreign exchange capital account, asset realization account, guarantee account) no longer requires SAFE’s approval. Furthermore, multiple capital accounts for the same entity may be opened in different provinces, which was not possible before the issuance of SAFE Circular 59. Reinvestment of lawful incomes derived by foreign investors in the PRC (e.g. profit, proceeds of equity transfer, capital reduction, liquidation and early repatriation of investment) no longer requires SAFE’s approval or verification, and purchase and remittance of foreign exchange as a result of capital reduction, liquidation, early repatriation or share transfer in a foreign-invested enterprise no longer requires SAFE’s approval.

SAFE Circular 19

On March 30, 2015, SAFE promulgated the Circular on Reforming the Management Approach regarding the Settlement of Foreign Exchange Capital of Foreign-invested Enterprises (《国家外汇管理局关于改革外商投资企业外汇资本金结汇管理方式的通知》 ), or SAFE Circular 19, which came into effect on June 1, 2015 with its last amendment on December 30, 2019. According to SAFE Circular 19, the foreign exchange capital of foreign-invested enterprises, or the FIE, shall be subject to a discretional foreign exchange settlement, or the Discretional Foreign Exchange Settlement. The Discretional Foreign Exchange Settlement refers to the foreign exchange capital in the capital account of an FIE for which the rights and interests of monetary contribution has been confirmed by the local foreign exchange bureau (or the book-entry registration of monetary contribution by the banks) and can be settled at the banks based on the actual operational needs of the FIE. The proportion of Discretional Foreign Exchange Settlement of the foreign exchange capital of an FIE is temporarily determined as 100%. Renminbi converted from a foreign exchange capital will be kept in a designated account and if an FIE needs to make further payment from such account, it still needs to provide supporting documents and go through the review process with the banks.

66

Table of Contents

Furthermore, SAFE Circular 19 stipulates that the use of capital by foreign-invested enterprises shall follow the principles of authenticity and self-use within the business scope of enterprises. The capital of an FIE and capital in Renminbi obtained by the FIE from foreign exchange settlement shall not be used for the following purposes:

SAFE Circular 37

On July 4, 2014, the Circular of the State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Issues Concerning Foreign Exchange Administration over the Overseas Investment and Financing and Round-trip Investment by Domestic Residents via Special Purpose Vehicles (《国家外汇管理局关于境内居民通过特殊目的公司境外投融资及返程投资外汇管理有关问题的通知》), or SAFE Circular 37, became effective on July 4, 2014. Pursuant to SAFE Circular 37, SAFE and its branches shall enforce registration management for establishment of a special purpose vehicle, or SPV, by domestic residents (including domestic institutions and domestic resident individuals, and domestic resident individuals shall refer to PRC citizens holding the identity cards for PRC domestic residents, military identity certificates or identity certificates for armed police force, and overseas individuals that do not hold any domestic legitimate identity certificates but have habitual residences within the territory of the PRC due to relationships of economic interests). Prior to contributing domestic and overseas legitimate assets or interests to an SPV, a domestic resident shall apply to SAFE for foreign exchange registration of overseas investment. Where a registered overseas SPV undergoes changes of its domestic resident individual shareholders, name, operating period or other basic information, or experiences substantial changes including without limitation the increase or reduction of registered capital by domestic resident individuals, transfer or replacement of equity and merger or split, the SPV shall go through modification registration of foreign exchange for overseas investment with SAFE. Where a non-listed SPV uses its own equity interests or options to grant equity incentives to the directors, supervisors and senior management of a domestic enterprise under its direct or indirect control, as well as other employees in employment or labor relationships with the aforesaid company, relevant domestic resident individuals may, before exercising their rights, apply to SAFE for foreign exchange registration of the SPV.

SAFE Circular 13

Pursuant to the Circular on Further Simplifying and Improving the Direct Investment-related Foreign Exchange Administration Policies (《关于进一步简化和改进直接投资外汇管理政策的通知》), or SAFE Circular 13, which was promulgated by SAFE on February 13, 2015 and became effective on June 1, 2015, with its last amendment on December 30, 2019, the foreign exchange registration under domestic direct investment and the foreign exchange registration under overseas direct investment will be directly reviewed and handled by banks in accordance with SAFE Circular 13, and SAFE and its branches shall perform indirect regulation over the foreign exchange registration via banks.

SAFE Circular 7

Pursuant to the Circular of the State Administration of Foreign Exchange on the Relevant Issues Concerning the Administration of Foreign Exchange for Domestic Individuals’ Participation in Equity Incentive Programs of Overseas Listed Companies (《国家外汇管理局关于境内个人参与境外上市公司股权激励计划外汇管理有关问题的通知》), all individuals who participate in the same equity incentive program of an overseas listed company shall, through their domestic company, collectively entrust one domestic agency to solely handle the relevant matters for them including registration of foreign exchange, opening of the account and transfer and conversion of funds, and one overseas agency shall solely handle such matters including individuals’ exercise of rights, the purchase and sale of relevant stocks or equities and transfer of relevant funds.

67

Table of Contents

Regulations in the United States

The following sets forth a description of certain laws, regulations and government policies relating to cryptocurrencies and cryptocurrency mining in the United States, which we consider a key market for our overseas business.

We are not aware of any law that currently makes it per se illegal for a natural person or entity simply to possess, sell, or trade Bitcoin on its own behalf in connection with lawful transactions in the United States, provided that any transaction complies generally with applicable law. Nonetheless, in the United States, both the federal government and individual states have regulations in place that govern the offer, sale, and transmission of various types of cryptocurrency, including but not limited to Bitcoin, and the legal status of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies continues to evolve.

The United States Commodity Futures Trading Commission, or CFTC, has taken the position that crypto currencies, such as Bitcoin, are “commodities” covered by the Commodity Exchange Act and subject to regulation by the CFTC. In March 2018, a United States federal court affirmed the CFTC’s authority to regulate cryptocurrencies. This means that the CFTC has jurisdiction over any futures, options or derivatives contracts involving cryptocurrencies as well as any fraud or manipulation involving cryptocurrencies in the spot market. Our Bitcoin mining machines are not intended to be used either for any futures, options or derivatives trading or to enable fraud or manipulation. However, to the extent that any mining activity using our products were to be deemed a form of fraud or manipulation, or our products were otherwise used for fraud or manipulation, we could potentially be subject to regulatory or private actions related to those uses.

In addition, while the SEC has taken the position that Bitcoin, Ether, and certain cryptocurrencies subject to significant operational restrictions are not “securities” regulated by the federal securities laws, it is likely that the SEC will view almost all other cryptocurrencies other than Bitcoin and Ether that can be mined to be “securities,” based on their status as “investment contracts” under the guidance provided by the SEC “Framework for ‘Investment Contract’ Analysis of Digital Assets,” and the application of the test under SEC v. W. J. Howey Co. (the “Howey test”) to cryptocurrencies. It is similarly likely that these other cryptocurrencies will be treated as securities under the laws of the individual states.

The status of additional cryptocurrencies as securities could impose significant restrictions on us or our customers with operations that are located in the United States or involve United States residents. Typically, offerings and distributions of securities in the United States are required to register with the SEC under the Securities Act and, in compliance with state law, with applicable state regulators. If the offering of a cryptocurrency that can be mined using our Bitcoin mining machines is deemed a security, miners may be required to cease mining that cryptocurrency, which would negatively affect our business. In addition, if our company were viewed as facilitating an illegal distribution of a cryptocurrency, our company could be subject to liability associated with its product sales. Further, even if a cryptocurrency that is considered to be a security is legally distributed under the US securities laws, the miners of that cryptocurrency could be viewed as statutory underwriters or as “brokers” subject to regulation under the Exchange Act because they are effecting transactions in those securities for a fee (i.e., mining rewards). This outcome would again potentially reduce the viability of our product sales and could also subject us to liability. Any of these developments could limit the future development of our business. See “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Our Business and Industry—We are subject to risks associated with legal, political or other conditions or developments regarding holding, using or mining of Bitcoins, which could negatively affect our business, results of operations and financial position.”

Further, the Department of the Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, or FinCEN, regulates “money transmitters,” including certain administrators and exchangers of cryptocurrencies, and state laws also regulate money transmission; more generally, cryptocurrency transactions may implicate a variety of federal and state laws designed to counter money laundering. In that regard, it should be noted that U.S. Secretary of the Treasury Steven Mnuchin has indicated that federal regulators are specifically looking for potential money laundering activities involving cryptocurrency.

We are a holding company incorporated in Cayman Islands and do not have substantive operations. Like many large scale, multinational companies with businesses around the world, we conduct our business through a number of subsidiaries across the world, as we expand through organic growth and/or acquisitions and consolidations of new businesses.

68

Table of Contents

The following is a list of our principal subsidiaries as of the date of this annual report on Form 20-F, and their respective date of incorporation, jurisdictions of incorporation, principal activities and the ownership interest we hold:

​

69

Table of Contents

The following diagram illustrates our corporate structure, including our principal subsidiaries described above, as of the date of this annual report on Form 20-F:

Please refer to “B. Business Overview—Properties” for a discussion of our property, plants and equipment.

​

ITEM 4A.UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

Not applicable.

​

ITEM 5.OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS

Unless otherwise stated, the discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operation in this section apply to our financial information as prepared according to U.S. GAAP. You should read the following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and operating results in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this annual report. The following discussion contains forward-looking statements based upon current expectations that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results and the timing of selected events may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including those set forth under “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors.”

70

Table of Contents

We provide supercomputing solutions through our proprietary high performance computing ASICs. We have strong ASIC chip design capability underpinned by over ten years of industry experience and expertise of our founders and management team. We are one of the few fabless IC design companies with the advanced technology to independently design ASIC, established access to leading wafer foundry capacity and proven in-house capability to produce Bitcoin mining machines. We primarily dedicated technology and expertise in ASIC applications to Bitcoin mining machines and are a leading producer of Bitcoin mining machines in the global market. In addition, with our technology expertise and know-how in ASIC chip design, we strive to expand into AI fields and provide holistic AI solutions to our customers. Our PRC operating subsidiaries have delivered commercial edge computing AI chips based on Risc-V architecture and self-developed neural-network accelerator with outstanding performance. We believe our extensive experience and expertise in ASIC applications position us well in our future endeavors.

Leveraging our deep understanding of the cryptocurrency industry and strong technology as applied to ASIC chip design, we intend to capture the growth opportunity along the value chain of the cryptocurrency industry to enhance our offerings and achieve a more stable financial performance. We have started with the Bitcoin mining business through our strategic collaboration with certain cryptocurrency mining farms and aim to develop the Bitcoin mining business as the second engine to capitalize on the Bitcoin ecosystem and synergize with our bitcoin mining machines sales. We endeavor to grow our deployed computing power for mining and improve the energized hash rate to enhance our mining business. For the year ended December 31, 2020, 2021 and 2022, we generated revenue of nil, RMB21.7 million and RMB218.6 million (US$31.7 million) from the Bitcoin mining business, respectively.

We have developed competitive advantages in our business and technological capabilities, including the following:

71

Table of Contents

Our Business Model

We are a fabless IC designer engaged in the front-end and back-end of IC design, which are the major components of the IC product development chain. We currently dedicate our technology and expertise in ASIC chip design to Bitcoin mining machines and AI applications. We, through our PRC operating subsidiaries, independently design and develop our products in-house, including the design of proprietary ASIC chips for our Bitcoin mining machines. Front-end IC design and back-end IC design are the key parts of the IC design process. We determine the parameters of the IC chip, establish the basic logic of the design, map out the initial plan for the physical layout, and conduct back-end verification on the design. We then work closely with industry-leading third-party suppliers to fabricate, test and package the IC products we design. Moreover, we have established in-house production capabilities to assemble both Bitcoin mining machines and AI chips. We assemble our Bitcoin mining machines primarily at our assembly plant located in the PRC by integrating the ICs produced by us and related components we procure. We believe our outstanding technical expertise and production experience in IC development chain enables us to continuously introduce ICs with higher performance and power efficiency for application in both the blockchain and AI fields. In addition, we have started with the Bitcoin mining business through our strategic collaboration with certain cryptocurrency mining farms and aim to develop the Bitcoin mining business as the second engine to capitalize on the Bitcoin ecosystem and synergize with our Bitcoin mining machines sales. As we endeavor to grow our deployed computing power for mining and improve the energized hash rate to enhance our mining business, we believe that such business will play a more significant role in supplementing our Bitcoin mining machines sales, mitigate our inventory risks and contribute to our financial and operating results.

Key Factors Affecting Our Results of Operations

Our results of operations have been, and are expected to continue to be, affected by a number of factors, which primarily include the following:

Expected economic returns on Bitcoin mining activities, in particular, the fluctuations of Bitcoin price

Our revenues are primarily derived from the sales of Bitcoin mining machines and related parts, which are, in general, determined by the demand and pricing of our Bitcoin mining machines. Bitcoin miners’ purchasing behavior are primarily driven by the expected economic returns of Bitcoin mining. In addition, we also generate a portion of our revenues from our Bitcoin mining business, which is also primarily driven by the expected economic returns of Bitcoin mining. An increase in the Bitcoin price is a significant factor that could increase the expected economic returns generated by Bitcoin mining activities and stimulate the demand and average selling price for our Bitcoin mining machines, and vice versa. Bitcoin price fluctuated significantly in the past few years and resulted in corresponding fluctuations of our sale of Bitcoin mining machines. We expect our results of operations to continue to be affected by the fluctuations of Bitcoin price, as a significant portion of our revenue is expected to come from the sales of Bitcoin mining machines and related parts and a portion of our revenues is expected to come from our Bitcoin mining business. Any future significant reductions in the price of Bitcoin will likely have a material and adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

72

Table of Contents

In addition to the volatility of Bitcoin price, various other factors, mostly beyond our control, could impact the expected economic returns of Bitcoin mining as well, including, among others, increase in the Bitcoin’s total network hash rate, increase in transaction fees, increase in electricity costs or other operating costs, increase in computing power and efficiency of mining machines, and a variety of special economic, geopolitical and regulatory factors.

Additionally, fluctuations in Bitcoin price may affect the value of inventories as well as the provision we make to the inventory as we manage our inventories based on, among others, the sales forecast of our Bitcoin mining machines. As we generally increase our procurement volume and stock up finished goods for the launch of new products or we expect a surge of demand for Bitcoin mining machines, a significant drop in the Bitcoin price can lead to a lower expected sales price and excessive inventories, which in turn will lead to impairment losses with respect to such inventories. For example, as the Bitcoin price has fluctuated from the second half of 2022 to the first quarter of 2023, we continued to experience low demand and low prices in the Bitcoin mining machines market. Subsequently, another price drop on A12 series was offered in late March 2023, which in turn led to a further write-down to such inventories and related prepayments based on the most recent subsequent selling price, despite an inventories write-down recorded based on the price earlier. As a result, we recorded inventories write-down, prepayment write-down and provision for reserve for inventory purchase commitments of RMB629.4 million in 2022. If the Bitcoin price drops significantly in the future, we may make similar write-down again. To the extent we are able to sell such inventories above its carrying value, our gross profit may also be inflated by such write-down.

Furthermore, Bitcoin price drop in the past also led to our offering of credit sales to certain customers, instead of full prepayment before delivery of products. We consider the portion of the contract price on credit and not yet collected as implicit price concession and we recognize revenue based on subsequent information regarding our collection of such portion of the contract price. In 2020, we recognized such price concessions of RMB11.5 million. We did not provide price concession in 2021 and 2022.

Acceptance and Development of Blockchain Technology Applications, Especially Bitcoin

Our current blockchain application is designed for Bitcoin mining. Our revenues derived from sales of Bitcoin mining machines and related parts were RMB422.6 million in 2020, RMB4,939.9 million in 2021 and RMB4,150.3 million (US$601.7 million) in 2022. For the years ended December 31, 2020, 2021 and 2022, we generated revenue of nil, RMB21.7 million and RMB218.6 million (US$31.7 million) from the Bitcoin mining business, respectively. Any adverse development in blockchain technology and the cryptocurrency markets, and in the Bitcoin market in particular, can significantly impact our results of operations. The Bitcoin market can also be affected by the following factors, among others: (i) different views regarding the decentralized nature of cryptocurrencies, (ii) acceptance of cryptocurrencies as an investment instrument as well as a currency for payment, (iii) competing cryptocurrencies to Bitcoin, and (iv) changes in the Bitcoin algorithm and the mechanism of mining.

Performance and Cost of Our Products

The pricing of and demand for our Bitcoin mining machines and our AI chips are closely related to their performance. In general, more advanced process technologies can accommodate designs that produce ASICs with higher power efficiency. The introduction of new process and design technologies also enables us to gradually lower the production costs of ASICs with comparable computing power. However, the application of such process technologies also commands high initial setup costs, particularly when the new production techniques first become available, which translates to higher per unit costs. As a result, our new generation ASICs using the most advanced process technologies will need to achieve strong sales in order to justify the initial setup costs of the new production techniques and maintain our profitability. At the same time, as the most advanced production capabilities of IC foundries ramp up, the initial high unit cost for IC fabrication may also decrease, which will likely translate to lower fabrication costs and a positive effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

73

Table of Contents

Production Capacity

As a fabless IC design company, we outsource the fabrication process of our ICs to third-party foundry partners, and we outsource the testing and packaging process to third-party testing and packaging partners. We work closely with a limited number of such production partners. For example, in 2022, we mainly relied on two third-party foundry partners for our Bitcoin mining machine business, and we cannot guarantee that they will be able to meet our manufacturing requirements or capacity or that they will not raise their prices. In addition, our final test yield is a function of both product design, which is developed by us, and process technology of our third-party foundry partners. If any of our third-party foundry partners experiences manufacturing inefficiencies or encounters disruptions, errors or difficulties during production, we may fail to achieve acceptable final test yields or experience product delivery delays. See “Item 3. Key Information-D. Risk Factors-Risks Relating to Our Business and Industry- Failure at tape-out or failure to achieve the expected final test yields for our ASICs could negatively impact our operating results.” As a result, our ability to quickly respond to market demand and meet production timelines, as well as to price our products competitively, is highly dependent on our third-party production partners. If our production partners are unable to meet our production capacity requirements or deliver products that meet our quality standards on a timely basis, our results of operations will be adversely affected.

We may also incur significant cash outflow at the early stages of our production process because we are required to make prepayments to some of our third-party production partners to secure their production capacity beforehand, which may affect our liquidity position. In addition, any failure by our third-party production partners to perform their obligations in a timely manner may subject us to counterparty risk and make it difficult or impossible for us to fulfill our customers’ orders, which would harm our reputation and negatively affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Investment in Research and Development

We are a fabless IC design company. Our ability to design high quality ASICs largely depends on our continued investment in research and development, and our results of operations are affected by related expenses. Historically, we have invested substantially in research and development to build and enhance our competitive edge, and we need to continue to devote resources to research and development activities in order to (i) design and develop new or enhanced ASICs for Bitcoin mining applications, (ii) design and develop new or enhanced ASICs for AI applications, and (iii) expand our product offering and penetrate into new application markets, particularly into markets for ASIC applications that require high performance and strong computing power. We cannot assure you that we can continue to have a high successful tape-out rate. Unsuccessful tape-outs will significantly increase our research and development expenses. Our ability to design and develop new or enhanced ASICs for Bitcoin mining and AI applications and ASICs for other applications with market potential as well as maintain a high tape-out rate will have a material effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and profitability.

Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic

The COVID-19 pandemic has had, and, together with any subsequent outbreaks driven by new variants of COVID-19, may continue to have, a significant impact on our operations and financial results. The potential downturn brought by and the duration of the COVID-19 pandemic may be difficult to assess or predict where actual effects will depend on many factors beyond our control. The extent to which the COVID-19 pandemic impacts our long-term results remains uncertain, and we are closely monitoring its impact on us.

74

Table of Contents

In 2020, our operations were significantly affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. The revenue contribution from our Bitcoin mining machine business decreased in the first few months of 2020 compared to the prior period, partly due to the outbreak of COVID-19, which significantly affected the expected returns on Bitcoin related activities such as mining, and in turn resulted in a much lower demand and average selling price of our Bitcoin mining machines. Our Bitcoin mining machine business has been gradually recovering in 2021, underpinned by higher average selling price and more customer orders, following the effective control of the outbreaks in the PRC, the resumption of business activities and the gradual recovery of the global general economy. However, there have been significant resurgence of COVID-19 cases from time to time, including the COVID-19 Delta and Omicron variant cases. And we may experience disruptions to our business operations resulting from supply interruptions, quarantines, self-isolations, or other movement and restrictions on the ability of our employees or our counterparties to perform their jobs. For example, in March 2022, the COVID-19 resurgence, together with the resulting travel restrictions and quarantine measures, caused disruptions in the operations of our assembly plant in the PRC, which resulted in delays in the shipment of products to certain customers. Also, due to the outbreak of Omicron variant in 2022, certain cities in China have imposed new restrictions and quarantine requirements with office closures and stay home orders. At the end of November 2022, Chinese government eased strict zero COVID-19 policy which caused surge of COVID-19 cases in December 2022 and January 2023. The future impact of the COVID-19 pandemic is still highly uncertain and there is no assurance that the COVID-19 pandemic or any other pandemic, or other unfavorable global economic, business or political conditions, will not materially and adversely affect our business, prospects, financial condition, and operating results.

Regulatory Environment

Historically, a significant portion of our Bitcoin mining machines were sold to customers located in China. Because of the adverse changes in the regulatory environment in the PRC, we have been actively exploring the international markets outside the PRC and our revenues generated from sales to customers outside China, such as customers in Southeast Asia, the United States, Australia and Central Asia, represented 97.2% of our total revenues generated from sales of Bitcoin mining machines and related parts in 2022. As such, we need to ensure that we are compliant with the existing and future laws and regulations relating to our business in the various jurisdictions that are material to our business and operations. See “Item 3. Key Information-D. Risk Factors-Risks Relating to Our Business and Industry-We are subject to risks associated with legal, political or other conditions or developments regarding holding, using or mining of Bitcoins, which could negatively affect our business, results of operations and financial position.”

If a government in any jurisdiction changes its policy or regulations to prevent or limit the development of Bitcoin or cryptocurrencies generally, the price of Bitcoin and the demand for our mining machines as well as the future development of other cryptocurrency related business would decrease or fail, and our business operations and financial results could be adversely affected. Therefore, our ability to comply with government policies and regulations, and to anticipate and respond to potential changes in government policies and regulations will have a significant impact on our business operations and our overall results of operations.

Development of AI Technology, Especially Edge Computing

In addition to our Bitcoin mining machines, we have also developed ASICs for AI applications and have continued to make investments in the edge computing area. Revenues derived from the sale of our AI products was RMB4.9 million in 2020, RMB17.0 million in 2021 and RMB9.3 million (US$1.4 million) in 2022. The development of AI technology, especially as it relates to edge computing, and the acceptance of ASICs for AI applications is crucial to our future success in diversifying our product offering.

Key Components of Results of Operations

Revenue

We derive our revenue primarily from sales of Bitcoin mining machines.

75

Table of Contents

The following table sets forth a breakdown of our revenue by services, each expressed in the absolute amount and as a percentage of our total revenue, for the periods indicated: